• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Godly Wrath

igotbegot

Active Member
Jul 31, 2007
299
34
✟23,126.00
Faith
Marital Status
Married
In the O.T. there were many instances and prescriptions to kill people for various things, such as violating the sabbath, mocking god and his laws, worshiping false gods, being very ungodly, etc...

In modern times people don't do this much, and the ones that do are usually mocked and called criminals by the rest of the Christian community.

So why do Christians find obeying certain O.T. rules and regs (like condemning homosexuality) and not follow the other more important ones, like killing people that violate the sabbath (numbers 15, 32-35)?

After all, obeying the sabbath is one of God's top 10 commandments, yet no one follows the commands and precepts laid down in the bible regarding it, but the feel righteous indignation regarding homosexuals and whatnot...

Oh sure, murder, adultery, and worshiping idols are all sinful because of the ten commandments, but that stuff about the sabbath was nullified by the N.T. ya, right.

So what's the deal Christians? You're told to love God before you love others, so why don't you kill violators of the sabbath?

For the record, I'm not religious.
 

WarEagle

Well-Known Member
Nov 12, 2006
4,273
475
✟7,149.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
So why do Christians find obeying certain O.T. rules and regs (like condemning homosexuality)

Actually, homosexuality is condemned in the NT, too. There is no expiration date on God's moral laws.

and not follow the other more important ones, like killing people that violate the sabbath (numbers 15, 32-35)?

Read that passage again. It's a command to the nation of Israel under the Old Covenant. We're Christians under the New Covenant.

Why should we follow a law that wasn't given to us?

After all, obeying the sabbath is one of God's top 10 commandments, yet no one follows the commands and precepts laid down in the bible regarding it

Christians do. Remember, the Sabbath day was only a foreshadowing of the rest we have in Christ. Now that Christ has come and we have our rest in Him, there is no more need for the shadow.

Christ is the Sabbath now.

Oh sure, murder, adultery, and worshiping idols are all sinful because of the ten commandments, but that stuff about the sabbath was nullified by the N.T. ya, right.

No, not the NT, the New Covenant.

You're confusing moral laws with ceremonial laws. Two different things.

So what's the deal Christians? You're told to love God before you love others, so why don't you kill violators of the sabbath?

Because that would be murder and because God has already said that He'll take care of it.

For the record, I'm not religious.

Me neither.
 
Upvote 0

The Nihilist

Contributor
Sep 14, 2006
6,074
490
✟31,289.00
Faith
Atheist
I'm not a layman. I'm a minister.

What did I say that's Unbiblical?

Well, I was raised Catholic, and I understand the concept of laity in a specifically Catholic sense. By the difference in the very nature of the roles of Catholic clergy and Protestant ministers, in that Protestants do not believe that ministers are necessary for a believer to commune with God, I'm inclined to include you among the laity. This is not intended to be offensive.

What does bother me, though, both about the opinion you've expressed and those of the laity in general is that they always seem to have a sort of ad hoc quality. I mean, your response clearly indicates that there's at least one commandment you don't take seriously, and so you throw out a piece of theology that doesn't sound too bad. Upon closer inspection, though, I think your expressed opinion is highly questionable if the ten commandments are to be taken seriously.
Let's not make this a big Catholic vs Protestant thing, but Catholicism has the advantage of having about 2000 years of biblical scholarship. When I hear a bad opinion from a Catholic, I know he's wrong, I know why he's wrong, and I can point to a long tradition of biblical scholarship to back that up. Some Protestant traditions have a similarly strong history of biblical scholarship, and I trust that. I know that, whatever the differences in theology among these churches, little or nothing in the actual texts is ignored.
What I've found particularly among American evangelicals is that they find a line in the bible and hang their hat on it and that's that. Differing texts are often ignored or not sought out. The scholarship is flimsy, and doesn't stand the test of time.
 
Upvote 0

WarEagle

Well-Known Member
Nov 12, 2006
4,273
475
✟7,149.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Well, I was raised Catholic, and I understand the concept of laity in a specifically Catholic sense. By the difference in the very nature of the roles of Catholic clergy and Protestant ministers, in that Protestants do not believe that ministers are necessary for a believer to commune with God, I'm inclined to include you among the laity. This is not intended to be offensive.

I have at least as much education and training in theology and the Bible as any Roman Catholic priest.

I mean, your response clearly indicates that there's at least one commandment you don't take seriously

OK. Tell me which commandment I don't take seriously.

and so you throw out a piece of theology that doesn't sound too bad. Upon closer inspection, though, I think your expressed opinion is highly questionable if the ten commandments are to be taken seriously.

OK. What did I say that's Unbiblical?

Let's not make this a big Catholic vs Protestant thing, but Catholicism has the advantage of having about 2000 years of biblical scholarship.

Yes, and they also happen to be wrong on most doctrines.

Let's remember that Christians also have about 2,000 years of Biblical scholarship.

What I've found particularly among American evangelicals is that they find a line in the bible and hang their hat on it and that's that.

And when did I do that?

I didn't offer you "a line". I can't help that the BIble says that there's an old covenant and a new covenant. It isn't like I'm making this stuff up.

Differing texts are often ignored or not sought out.

That's because the only text we consider to be authoritative is the Bible.

The scholarship is flimsy, and doesn't stand the test of time.

Really? OK. Why don't you back that up and explain to me how my scholarship is flimsy.

Thanks, but I'll take my scholarship over "well, I don't care what the Bible says as long as I have the CCC."

In other words, you know that you can't refute the Bible so you just dismiss everything I've said because I'm a Christian.

If that's the game you want to play, then that's up to you and I guess I should have kept you on my ignore list, rather than giving you the benefit of the doubt and taking you off, but the fact remains that, under the New Covenant, Christ is the Sabbath, not a day of the week, and that homosexuality is condemned under both the OC and the NC because the OC and NC only dealth with ceremonial laws and not moral laws.

You still haven't shown anything I've said that's unbiblical and you still haven't shown anything I've said that's wrong.
 
Upvote 0

igotbegot

Active Member
Jul 31, 2007
299
34
✟23,126.00
Faith
Marital Status
Married
WarEagle said:
Actually, homosexuality is condemned in the NT, too. There is no expiration date on God's moral laws.

If you had as much theological education as you claim, you would know that the verse(s) that now say "homosexuality" or whatever, was actually speaking about boy lovers/pedophiles, not homosexual adults.

As I'm sure you must know, the NT was written mostly in greek. And the greeks had an accepted practice of "mentoring" young boys that included having sex with them. This is what is expressly rejected in the N.T. To infer that it includes homosexuality among consenting adults is interpretation, not hard fact.

WarEagle said:
Read that passage again. It's a command to the nation of Israel under the Old Covenant. We're Christians under the New Covenant.

The sabbath is not part of the "Old Covenant". It's one of the 10 commandments, of which none have expired or been replaced or nullified.

WarEagle said:
Christ is the Sabbath now.

Nowhere in the N.T does it say that you are no longer required to obey the sabbath as it exists in the O.T. You may believe that is the meaning of some of the scripture, but nowhere does it actually say that expressly.

Jesus obeyed the sabbath, his disciples obeyed the sabbath, and you should be too.

WarEagle said:
You're confusing moral laws with ceremonial laws. Two different things.

No I'm not. The 10 commandments are not ceremonial. They are distinctly separate from the ceremonial laws, and you should know that.

WarEagle said:
Because that would be murder and because God has already said that He'll take care of it.

So why bother being jerks to them?

WarEagle said:
Me neither.

Just keep telling yourself that.
 
Upvote 0

igotbegot

Active Member
Jul 31, 2007
299
34
✟23,126.00
Faith
Marital Status
Married
People always say that the old testament laws were only meant to apply then. My question than is that even if that is true, were not those laws still immoral? Was it not still wrong for people to be told to murder?
Of course it was. The O.T was written by a bunch violent, genocidal maniacs. So naturally it's full of the same.
 
Upvote 0

The Nihilist

Contributor
Sep 14, 2006
6,074
490
✟31,289.00
Faith
Atheist
I have at least as much education and training in theology and the Bible as any Roman Catholic priest.

OK. Tell me which commandment I don't take seriously.

OK. What did I say that's Unbiblical?

Yes, and they also happen to be wrong on most doctrines.

Let's remember that Christians also have about 2,000 years of Biblical scholarship.

And when did I do that?

I didn't offer you "a line". I can't help that the BIble says that there's an old covenant and a new covenant. It isn't like I'm making this stuff up.

That's because the only text we consider to be authoritative is the Bible.

Really? OK. Why don't you back that up and explain to me how my scholarship is flimsy.

Thanks, but I'll take my scholarship over "well, I don't care what the Bible says as long as I have the CCC."

In other words, you know that you can't refute the Bible so you just dismiss everything I've said because I'm a Christian.

If that's the game you want to play, then that's up to you and I guess I should have kept you on my ignore list, rather than giving you the benefit of the doubt and taking you off, but the fact remains that, under the New Covenant, Christ is the Sabbath, not a day of the week, and that homosexuality is condemned under both the OC and the NC because the OC and NC only dealth with ceremonial laws and not moral laws.

You still haven't shown anything I've said that's unbiblical and you still haven't shown anything I've said that's wrong.



This is exactly what I'm talking about, you're just rejecting everything I've said without serious consideration. It's like you're trying to get everyone to just shut up and agree with you, and you don't care if there are holes in what you say. I've hardly appealed to the authority of any church. All I've done is to call your methodology into question, and you'd rather insult me than show me that I'm wrong.
Christ is the sabbath? I'm pretty sure that's made up. This is precisely what I was talking about. Without a serious academic tradition of biblical scholarship, there's nothing to prevent anyone from coming up with dumb ideas about what the bible means. I don't feel like it's up to your or me to try and say whether the bible approves or doesn't approve of homosexuality for example. I feel this should be left to the experts within the field of theology, just as we would see a doctor about our health, for example. Of course, interpretations are going to differ between, say, Lutherans and Presbyterians, but at least they're going to be internally consistent
But what's offensive to me about your post is that you're really not even willing to grant that you're wrong on anything. The Catholic church is wrong on thousands of doctrines? I think you mean you disagree with them. Without some actual authority, and I mean real authority, not a pope, you're not in a position to say who's wrong.
 
Upvote 0

WarEagle

Well-Known Member
Nov 12, 2006
4,273
475
✟7,149.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
If you had as much theological education as you claim, you would know that the verse(s) that now say "homosexuality" or whatever, was actually speaking about boy lovers/pedophiles, not homosexual adults.

It says men sleeping with men as with women.

The sabbath is not part of the "Old Covenant". It's one of the 10 commandments, of which none have expired or been replaced or nullified.

Actually, it's one of those rare things that falls under both laws.

Nowhere in the N.T does it say that you are no longer required to obey the sabbath as it exists in the O.T. You may believe that is the meaning of some of the scripture, but nowhere does it actually say that expressly.

I don't know what NT you're reading, but ours says it very clearly.

Jesus obeyed the sabbath, his disciples obeyed the sabbath, and you should be too.

I do. I observe Christ as Sabbath, just like all Christians.

No I'm not. The 10 commandments are not ceremonial. They are distinctly separate from the ceremonial laws, and you should know that.

Please read my posts before you respond to them. I just pointed out that they're two different things.

So why bother being jerks to them?

Nobody should be a jerk to anybody.

Just keep telling yourself that.

OK. I will.
 
Upvote 0

WarEagle

Well-Known Member
Nov 12, 2006
4,273
475
✟7,149.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
"Let no man condemn you for any holiday, religious festival, or sabbath." Paraphrased verse, but what do you take of it? (NT btw, one of the epistles.. Collossians I think.

There are several similar NT verses that tell believers not to judge other believers because they observe a different day or no day at all.

In other words, it tells them not to give those believers who don't observe the Jewsish Sabbath a hard time because it isn't their Sabbath.
 
Upvote 0

Lockguy3000

Senior Member
Nov 14, 2007
1,075
62
NYC
✟24,055.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
I'm very thankful for the New covenant; specially the one for gentiles, and circumcision.

But if I have to cut it off, as to:
Mark 9:47
And if your eye causes you to sin, pluck it out. It is better for you to enter the kingdom of God with one eye than to have two eyes and be thrown into hell,

OH, I think I'm going to get flamed for this.
 
Upvote 0

Polycarp1

Born-again Liberal Episcopalian
Sep 4, 2003
9,588
1,669
USA
✟40,875.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
War Eagle, where in Scripture do you find the criteria by which you distinguish between the various classes of Law? How do you reconcile applying the so-called "moral commandments" with Paul's reiterated statement that we are free from the Law?
 
Upvote 0

selfinflikted

Under Deck
Jul 13, 2006
11,441
786
46
✟39,014.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
War Eagle, where in Scripture do you find the criteria by which you distinguish between the various classes of Law? How do you reconcile applying the so-called "moral commandments" with Paul's reiterated statement that we are free from the Law?

Gah. I have asked him this very same question at least four or five times in the past, and I'm ignored every time. I suspect there is no real biblical basis to make such a distinction, and that said distinction is based purely on subjective morality. In other words, wareagle probably likes to have his hair trimmed maybe once a month so that he looks nice preaching from the pulpit, so that law against cutting hair isn't important. I'm guessing he's not gay, nor tempted to have sex with another man, so that law is still enforceable. See? Easy, huh?
 
Upvote 0

tcampen

Veteran
Jul 14, 2003
2,704
151
✟33,632.00
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
I'm going to jump on this bandwagon too. WarEagle, where IN THE BIBLE is there support that since Jesus, the ceremonial laws are no longer necessary, but the moral laws should still be upheld, AND where in the bible does it tell us the difference between ceremonial and moral laws?
 
Upvote 0

tapero

Legend
Site Supporter
Apr 14, 2004
36,575
1,128
Visit site
✟133,544.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
In the O.T. there were many instances and prescriptions to kill people for various things, such as violating the sabbath, mocking god and his laws, worshiping false gods, being very ungodly, etc...

In modern times people don't do this much, and the ones that do are usually mocked and called criminals by the rest of the Christian community.

So why do Christians find obeying certain O.T. rules and regs (like condemning homosexuality) and not follow the other more important ones, like killing people that violate the sabbath (numbers 15, 32-35)?

After all, obeying the sabbath is one of God's top 10 commandments, yet no one follows the commands and precepts laid down in the bible regarding it, but the feel righteous indignation regarding homosexuals and whatnot...

Oh sure, murder, adultery, and worshiping idols are all sinful because of the ten commandments, but that stuff about the sabbath was nullified by the N.T. ya, right.

So what's the deal Christians? You're told to love God before you love others, so why don't you kill violators of the sabbath?

For the record, I'm not religious.

Hi, I just want to state for the record I'm not so sure you got this bit right:

prescriptions to kill people for various things, such as violating the sabbath, mocking god and his laws, worshiping false gods, being very ungodly, etc...

without checking leviticus (the laws, the one in blue is one I am certain is a law in leviticus the others I'm not sure of..though for sure worhsipping false gods is in 10 commandments, just not sure how it's covered in the levitical law at the moment.

okay,

Christians many do not keep the 10 commandments and we are not to. many say they do and they don't. First we are not under the 10 commandments but the ones who say we are, do not keep the sabbath. If they kept the sabbath, they would follow the directions to keep the sabbath holy. It's written in the bible about it, and is very detailed.

by the way, I am not referring to those who are Messianics, who do try to keep the laws, 10 commandments and levitical laws. Messianics are believers in Christ ,some Jewish some Gentile and have variety of different beliefs and practices among them.

That's a different topic, i am talking about Christians in general

The ones who say we are to keep the 10 commandments, what they must do, is they must say, well, the sabbath is to me, sunday, so yeah, i keep the sabbath. NOT. cause as i said, unless they do all that is required as pertains to the sabbath they are violating that commandment. And they just call it sunday, the day they worship, the sabbath, and then they do or do not do certain things as they feel led to or led not to do. Has nothing to do with what is actually to be done as detailed in the bible on the sabbath.

But they are not keeping the Sabbath which is written of in the 10 commandments.

The other commandments are things we are not to do or do, even today as sin is sin and sin never changes. Though the bible does not contain every sin there is.

on this commandment:

You shall not misuse the name of the LORD your God, for the LORD will not hold anyone guiltless who misuses his name.

No one quite knows what this is about imo.

Some say it means you can't use God's name as a swear word.

Some say other things.

I personally think it means, don't say God says when God doesn't say, or something like that.

So anyway, we are not under the 10 commandments, but nonetheless sin is sin.

murder is sin, etc.

the Sabbath is the key which proves is not to us in NT times under Christ, as gentiles never were given the sabbath, was only given to the Hebrews, the Jewish people.

I dont' think it's an accurate statement to say as you said above that those who do not do as you listed are considered criminals by Christians.

That is not accurate tho may be some feel that way but would be the minority, as fairly much Christians know that all of us sin and mess up, so no, we don't look at those who mess up as criminals, as we ourselves mess up as well. as do all people.

onto the homosexuality question. (well on this one, yup some do go after homosexuals and somehow forget that they sin as well)

okay, now i've explained to you that we are not under the 10 commandments, never were and we are not under levitical law (that is law that is contained in the book of leviticus where stonings for violating the law occurred and other penalties, depending on the violation)

So we are not under the levitical law, it was only given to the Jews.

Christ came and fulfilled the law, we live in a time period if you will of grace.

No one is under the law (again recall my disclaimer on Messianics)

Now we are under commandments contained in the New Testament. Commandments are what we are to do and are not to do. And we strive not to do or to do whichever. and we fail and fall short, we all do, as all sin, and not all even know yet what it's about, as they may be new in their walk with God, or may be old in their walk with God but have not perhaps, ventured on certain scriptures, or it hasn't struck them, their minds, as to do or not to.

sorry for the length here.

so i think i've explained..we don't kill for violations of the law because the laws were not given to us, and Christ has fulfilled the laws, and we are not under them, and never were, only the Jewish people were and they (if believers in Christ) also no longer are under the law.

back to homosexuals.

in the old testament God gives a few things on some topics, or sins..one being homosexuals..gives them in several places..there's more on the list but that's one of em.

in the nt, same is written, about it being sin as well.

Now, for some unknown to me reason, some Christians think homosexuality is the worst sin of all.

It's not. It's the same as any sin in God's eyes, and Christians sin. Christians are forgiven sin, but Christians sin as well.

Sexual immorality is a sin, Christians sin.

So I do not know why Christians go after this particular sin rather than their own daughter living unmarried with their boyfriend.

Though i have my guesses as to why.

not just homosexuality, but any sexual immorality is passed down to others. Not in families, I mean, trying to gain acceptance as a social norm. (such as you rarely hear christians going after those unmarried as you would have 30 years or so back) now its's homosexuality as being unmarried and having sex has become the norm for society, though is sin.


There of course is movement in the country to stop people from condemning homosexuality, to allow for gay marriage and other laws as pertains, and there is in schools being taught that sexual immorality is okay, and that includes homosexuality.

This troubles many, including me.. that is that kids are being taught on public dollars that sexual immorality is not wrong, and is okay.

I understand why it's done, as they do not want kids to have great guilt over things they do, but there is also a movement going on as well.

talk to many kids now, and they'll say yeah, bisexuality is cool. that's fairly new and came out of this movement to teach kids that wrong is not wrong.

that is to make sin not sin.

God says all sin is wrong doing.

There are churches that say sin is not sin, certain sin at least.

Remember, we all sin, Christians included and can be any sin.

So it may well be the political movements/the problems at schools that trouble many Christians.

BUT

on the boards here, when talking to someone who is gay, to treat them as if they are a horrible person, when we/they ourselves commit just as many sins and do wrong all the time as well, is very wrong.

or to treat anyone as horrible regardless of the sin is wrong..

so to call out a certain sin as worse than another is wrong, that is in an individual manner I mean

That is what you see on the boards a lot.

But as to try to stop the political movements going on is a different situation.

Just as a non Christian may want Pluto to be named King (just making somethng up) and they go and fight for that right, Christians have the same right to say, nope, not going to let this occur and the war goes on.

same with abortion, etc.

so a long post to try to explain what may be or is going on, and why homosexuals are gone after as they are.

There are also Christians who are gay. Either they dont believe it's a sin, as some churches teach it's not, same as with any sexual immorallity,

or

they know it's sin but do it anyway.

other christians who are not homosexual do the very same..

when they participate in a sin, no matter what it is, they've either justified it in their mind that its okay,

or

they know better and do it anyway.

sorry for long post, but yup, we are not under any of the 10 commandments in the least.

however, any sin in the bible is sin and will always be sin and some sin is listed in the 10 commandments and elsewhere in the old testament, newtestament and there are sins not in the bible.

take care,
tapero
 
Upvote 0

quatona

"God"? What do you mean??
May 15, 2005
37,512
4,302
✟190,302.00
Faith
Seeker
Gah. I have asked him this very same question at least four or five times in the past, and I'm ignored every time.
Couple of weeks ago I made a thread dedicated to getting clarification in that very question, but none of those who keep arguing from "ceremonial vs. moral laws" showed up there.
Go figure.
 
Upvote 0