• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

God is Said to do that which He Merely Allowed or Permitted

dkbwarrior

Favoured of the Lord
Sep 19, 2006
4,186
511
60
Tulsa, Oklahoma
✟29,349.00
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Gxg (G²);66830771 said:
Moreover, several points you've made have been on things I NEVER said - thus seeming like you're arguing with something you read into context rather than what I stated. But that's another issue :)

That is only because I am doing a general job of addressing the issue at large while using your post as a starting point, so much isn't directed at you or your post particularly. Although I probably am not doing an adequate job of clarifying what parts are directed towards you and what parts are more general in nature. My apologies... :)

Peace...
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

dkbwarrior

Favoured of the Lord
Sep 19, 2006
4,186
511
60
Tulsa, Oklahoma
✟29,349.00
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Gxg (G²);66830783 said:
Christ was not a victim of circumstances.....and his death wasn't the result of circumstances, caprice, chance, fortune or luck. It was all a matter of the Lord being in control. From here, however, thoughts naturally come up of whether or not people like Judas chose to betray Christ or whether it was already set up for him to take the fall. And the same with those who chose to murder the Son of God. On the aspect of man's will being affected for the purposes of the Cross, it'd make perfect sense as to why the Son of Man had such an ability to forgive them even when they were sinning against him--for to a significant degree, they Really didn't know what they were doing....and had they knew the full ramifications of it, they'd probably would've stopped--just as it is with nearly all sinful activities where people willfully choose sin and yet are not really aware of the full ramifications of it when in the process of committining.

I have a different take on the wisdom of God and foreknowledge than others here it seems. I dont think we can understand this because of our being trapped within a bubble of time that only flows one way.

God lives outside of time, IMHO. He knows the end from the beginning, He is the Alpha and the Omega. That is to say, God is Omniscient, precisely because He is Omnipresent. He exists at the end of time concurrently with existing at the beginning of time. He doesn't know what is going to happen because He is prescient, He knows what is going to happen because He is already there after it happened and has seen it.

This is a concept that we can describe, but we cannot comprehend, because it is completely foreign to our concept of existence. It isn't even fair to try to comprehend it, as it is impossible. The best we can do is to simply believe it.

Peace...
 
Upvote 0

now faith

Veteran
Site Supporter
Jul 31, 2011
7,772
1,568
florida
✟279,972.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
I have a different take on the wisdom of God and foreknowledge than others here it seems. I dont think we can understand this because of our being trapped within a bubble of time that only flows one way.

God lives outside of time, IMHO. He knows the end from the beginning, He is the Alpha and the Omega. That is to say, God is Omniscient, precisely because He is Omnipresent. He exists at the end of time concurrently with existing at the beginning of time. He doesn't know what is going to happen because He is prescient, He knows what is going to happen because He is already there after it happened and has seen it.

This is a concept that we can describe, but we cannot comprehend, because it is completely foreign to our concept of existence. It isn't even fair to try to comprehend it, as it is impossible. The best we can do is to simply believe it.

Peace...

How could we ever know anything about God the being that created all things?

Far past our pay grade.


1 Corinthians: 3. 19. For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. For it is written, He taketh the wise in their own craftiness. 20. And again, The Lord knoweth the thoughts of the wise, that they are vain. 21. Therefore let no man glory in men. For all things are yours; - Bible Offline
 
Upvote 0

Gxg (G²)

Pilgrim/Monastic on the Road to God (Psalm 84:1-7)
Site Supporter
Jan 25, 2009
19,765
1,429
Good Ol' South...
Visit site
✟187,250.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
There are numerous examples in which The Bible itself clarifies what is meant by God is said to do that which He merely allowed. Notice how God is said to have killed King Saul:

1 Chronicles 10
13 So Saul died for his transgression which he committed against the Lord, even against the word of the Lord, which he kept not, and also for asking counsel of one that had a familiar spirit, to enquire of it;
14 And enquired not of the Lord: therefore he slew him, and turned the kingdom unto David the son of Jesse.​

Makes God appear to be a little vindictive, don't you think? Yet, several verses before this Saul is said to have committed suicide:

1 Chronicles 10
4 Then said Saul to his armourbearer, Draw thy sword, and thrust me through therewith; lest these uncircumcised come and abuse me. But his armourbearer would not; for he was sore afraid. So Saul took a sword, and fell upon it.
5 And when his armourbearer saw that Saul was dead, he fell likewise on the sword, and died.​

So the question you all must ask is "does God use His divine energy to override the will and push people to kill themselves" or is God simply taking responsibility for a free will choice? We report, you decide.

Anyway, what does it say about free will if God is the one who pushes suicide what does this say about His character? How could He present Himself as the moral judge of the universe if He moves people to sin, including self murder.
I think what may make more of a difference is understanding the reality of where I Samuel already noted how God had declared judgment on Saul (I Samuel 15) and re-affirmed it when he saw the witch at Endor (against the Law).

I Samuel 28:15-20

Then Saul knew it was Samuel, and he bowed down and prostrated himself with his face to the ground.

15 Samuel said to Saul, “Why have you disturbed me by bringing me up?”

“I am in great distress,” Saul said. “The Philistines are fighting against me, and God has departed from me. He no longer answers me, either by prophets or by dreams. So I have called on you to tell me what to do.”

16 Samuel said, “Why do you consult me, now that the Lord has departed from you and become your enemy? 17 The Lord has done what he predicted through me. The Lord has torn the kingdom out of your hands and given it to one of your neighbors—to David. 18 Because you did not obey the Lord or carry out his fierce wrath against the Amalekites, the Lord has done this to you today. 19 The Lord will deliver both Israel and you into the hands of the Philistines, and tomorrow you and your sons will be with me. The Lord will also give the army of Israel into the hands of the Philistines.”

20 Immediately Saul fell full length on the ground, filled with fear because of Samuel’s words. His strength was gone, for he had eaten nothing all that day and all that night.​

And later, after being taken care of by the witch, he later went into battle knowing that God had already delivered him into his enemies and killed himself.

I Samuel 31:1-4

Saul Takes His Life
31 Now the Philistines fought against Israel; the Israelites fled before them, and many fell dead on Mount Gilboa. 2 The Philistines were in hot pursuit of Saul and his sons, and they killed his sons Jonathan, Abinadab and Malki-Shua. 3 The fighting grew fierce around Saul, and when the archers overtook him, they wounded him critically.

4 Saul said to his armor-bearer, “Draw your sword and run me through, or these uncircumcised fellows will come and run me through and abuse me.”

But his armor-bearer was terrified and would not do it; so Saul took his own sword and fell on it. 5 When the armor-bearer saw that Saul was dead, he too fell on his sword and died with him. 6 So Saul and his three sons and his armor-bearer and all his men died together that same day.​

The choice to kill himself was Saul's alone - but he also chose to go into battle any way (pride) and ignore where God had already handed him over to his enemies - a form of punishment for failing to eradicate the Amalekites as God commanded (a very wicked people). For God to set the scenario up where Saul would be killed would not be inconsistent with the Lord in how he judges. Saul was going to die that day.

To be more specific, God had rejected Saul due to his own stubborness and rebellion (I Samuel 15:22-26) and had judged him for his own sins (I Samuel 28:16-19). As a result, God arranged for a defeat in battle so that Saul would die and his own kingdom would be taken from his family...and if Saul had not taken his own life, the Philistine soldiers would have killed him. Saul could have chosen to be killed by the soldiers - but then took his life, an action that was HIS alone.

And with the Suicide, there's nothing saying God DROVE HIM to commit suicide. What God desired was for him to be killed - but suicide was seen as a way out for Saul to avoid his fate. He faced death in th esame way he faced life - and in Eastern culture (just as it is today, including in places like Japan with Samurai and seppuku), taking your life was a means of preserving whatever honor you had. If you lost honor in a shame-based culture, you regained it by choosing to end your life - so Saul's action is not all that surprising. The same occurred in Judges 9:53 with Abimelech at the end when a mill-stone was dropped on his head by a woman and he asked another man to kill him so he'd not die by the hand of a woman. Ritual suicide, again, was not uncommon in the Eastern World - more in Nabataean Religion: Honor and Shame

For the Lord to allow Saul to perish in the manner he did, it can be very difficult to see how God was faithful in that manner. But much of that would go back to seeing what God had intended for Saul and what Saul had done afterward.

having a King was ever something the Lord was fully against.....but rather, the Spirit people were in when wanting a King. For even within the Mosaic Law, the concept of King was present since the Lord made provision for it....noting that having a king was allowed (and predicted) and the King was to fear the LorD (Deuteronomy 17:15-17 / Deuteronomy 17 )

With SAUL, although he turned out to be exactly what Samuel warned against, I don't see anywhere in scripture where it was FATED to go that route...as if the Lord always felt Saul wasn't a good choice. There are examples of where the Lord truly seemed grieved/regrettable about actions that He did---which many have noted were in many ways "mistakes." Genesis 6:5-7 , 1 Samuel 15:10-12 1 Samuel 15:34-35 are some of the most immediate examples----with the example of Saul being one of the greatest ones since God Himself chose Saul.

The Prophet Samuel was in the transition time frame from the era of the Judges to the rise of the Monarchy.

The people wanted a king, as I Samuel 8---and though God said that the people had rejected Him in his reign over them, asking for a king was not wrong in/of itself. For God had mentioned the possibility of having a King within the Law in Deuteronomy 17:14-20. But where the people erred was in wanting a king for its own sake.....to be like the other nations and yet not have one either submitted to God's Laws or one through whom God would live out his reign. Thus, God told the people that even their king would have to obey His standards.....

When the Lord found Saul in I Samuel 9, He was a very meek man--not even considering Himself worthy as a king (I Samuel 9:21-22). He referred to himself as coming from the smallest tribe in Israel...the Benjamites...and this is significant in light of what happened in Judges 20:46-48 as well as Judges 19-21 when the tribe of Benjamin defended men who were rapists/sexually immoral and the tribe was nearly wiped out in war later on.

Later, as seen in I Samuel 10, Saul was crowned King....anointed publically---and the text makes clar that God changed his heart ( 1 Samuel 10:9 ) and instructed Him....with Saul being one who prophesied and worshipped as seen in I Samuel 10:10-13 when he was with the other prophets prophesying. It was so shocking that when Saul's friends heard inspired words coming from Saul they exclaimed, "Is Saul also among the prophets?"............for the scriptures make clear in I Samuel 10:6 that the Spirit of the Lord came upon SAUL.

With this, one must wonder how could Saul be so filled with the Spirit and yet later commit such evil acts....but throughout the OT, God's Spirit came upon a person temporarily so that God could use him or her for great acts. This happened frequently to Israel's judges when they were called by God to rescue the nation (Judges 3:8-10). This was not always a permanent, abiding influence...but sometimes a temporary manifestation of the Holy Spirit (Numbers 11:25-29, Judges 3:10, Judges 14:6, etc).

In many ways, it corresponds to the "filling" of the Holy Spirit in the New Testament..but even in times of the OT, the Spirit even came upon unbelievers to enable them to do unusual tasks (Numbers 24 with Balaam, II Chronicles 36:22-23 with Cyrus King of Persia as also seen in Isiah 44:28 and Jeremiah 25:12). Saul, in his early years as king, had "another heart" as a result of the Holy Spirit's work n Him...and the Spirit of God came upon him strongly in other instances as well-----as seen in I Samuel 11:6 when the Spirit of the Lord came upon Saul when hearing of the Ammonites' threat to humilate/mistreat fellow Israelities---with the Spirit of God leading Saul to become angry and giving the Lord the opportunity to channel anger in constructive ways to bring justice.

But later, as Saul's power grew, so did His pride. Even though he lost the Kingdom at one point, as seen in I Samuel 13:9-12, he was still King. But eventually, after a while he refused to seek God---and the Spirit left him (I Samuel 16:14)...and his good attitude melted away. That's a big issue to raise up someone/change them, ONLY to have Him rebell later on in an increasingly gradual way (1 Samuel 13:8-14) and then do so many evils in the process , from trying to kill David (I Samuel 18, I Samuel 19, I Samuel 21, I Samuel 24, I Samuel 26, etc) to killing to Priests of Nob (I Samuel 22-23) - DIRECTLY ASSAULTING THE PRIESTHOOD AND GOD HIMSELF - and even consulting a witch in I Samuel 28.

Despite all of Saul's foolishness, the Lord had a plan for Him---and even desired that He'd do right...though sadly, things didn't go well as desired. Saul wasn't just elected by the people and then left alone as if the Lord didn't have what seemed to be a back-up plan for how Saul was to govern as King. For the Lord anointed Him to lead--and without His approval, the job wasn't going to get done. ....and later, Saul was rejected---still remaining as King for decades while the Spirit of God left Him. This has happened before where God will use someone, desiring one thing...only to get another and then adapt in kind.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Gxg (G²)

Pilgrim/Monastic on the Road to God (Psalm 84:1-7)
Site Supporter
Jan 25, 2009
19,765
1,429
Good Ol' South...
Visit site
✟187,250.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
There are numerous examples in which The Bible itself clarifies what is meant by God is said to do that which He merely allowed. Notice how God is said to have killed King Saul:

1 Chronicles 10
13 So Saul died for his transgression which he committed against the Lord, even against the word of the Lord, which he kept not, and also for asking counsel of one that had a familiar spirit, to enquire of it;
14 And enquired not of the Lord: therefore he slew him, and turned the kingdom unto David the son of Jesse.​

Makes God appear to be a little vindictive, don't you think? Yet, several verses before this Saul is said to have committed suicide:

1 Chronicles 10
4 Then said Saul to his armourbearer, Draw thy sword, and thrust me through therewith; lest these uncircumcised come and abuse me. But his armourbearer would not; for he was sore afraid. So Saul took a sword, and fell upon it.
5 And when his armourbearer saw that Saul was dead, he fell likewise on the sword, and died.​

So the question you all must ask is "does God use His divine energy to override the will and push people to kill themselves" or is God simply taking responsibility for a free will choice? We report, you decide.

Anyway, what does it say about free will if God is the one who pushes suicide what does this say about His character? How could He present Himself as the moral judge of the universe if He moves people to sin, including self murder.
For me,

What occurred with Saul is in the same vein as when God told King Ahab that HE'd die (as in 1 Kings 22 - with Ahab not being able to escape fate....and Ahab's ENTIRE family was executed as the Lord commanded/promised due to his sin with idolatry and murdering Naboth for his vineyard (2 Kings 10). Remember where Elijah the prophet was told by the Lord "18 “Go down to meet Ahab king of Israel, who rules in Samaria. He is now in Naboth’s vineyard, where he has gone to take possession of it. 19 Say to him, ‘This is what the Lord says: Have you not murdered a man and seized his property?’ Then say to him, ‘This is what the Lord says: In the place where dogs licked up Naboth’s blood, dogs will lick up your blood—yes, yours!’”"

And later, God told Ahab " ‘I am going to bring disaster on you. I will wipe out your descendants and cut off from Ahab every last male in Israel—slave or free.[a] 22 I will make your house like that of Jeroboam son of Nebat and that of Baasha son of Ahijah, because you have aroused my anger and have caused Israel to sin.’" (1 Kings 21:20)...and "“This is what the Lord says: ‘You have set free a man I had determined should die.[c] Therefore it is your life for his life, your people for his people.’” (I Kings 20:42)

I Kings 22 is a very illustrative chapter of God in both orchestrating events and setting them up:

1 Kings 22 New International Version (NIV)

Micaiah Prophesies Against Ahab
22 For three years there was no war between Aram and Israel. 2 But in the third year Jehoshaphat king of Judah went down to see the king of Israel. 3 The king of Israel had said to his officials, “Don’t you know that Ramoth Gilead belongs to us and yet we are doing nothing to retake it from the king of Aram?”

4 So he asked Jehoshaphat, “Will you go with me to fight against Ramoth Gilead?”

Jehoshaphat replied to the king of Israel, “I am as you are, my people as your people, my horses as your horses.” 5 But Jehoshaphat also said to the king of Israel, “First seek the counsel of the Lord.”

6 So the king of Israel brought together the prophets—about four hundred men—and asked them, “Shall I go to war against Ramoth Gilead, or shall I refrain?”

“Go,” they answered, “for the Lord will give it into the king’s hand.”

7 But Jehoshaphat asked, “Is there no longer a prophet of the Lord here whom we can inquire of?”

8 The king of Israel answered Jehoshaphat, “There is still one prophet through whom we can inquire of the Lord, but I hate him because he never prophesies anything good about me, but always bad. He is Micaiah son of Imlah.”

“The king should not say such a thing,” Jehoshaphat replied.

9 So the king of Israel called one of his officials and said, “Bring Micaiah son of Imlah at once.”

10 Dressed in their royal robes, the king of Israel and Jehoshaphat king of Judah were sitting on their thrones at the threshing floor by the entrance of the gate of Samaria, with all the prophets prophesying before them. 11 Now Zedekiah son of Kenaanah had made iron horns and he declared, “This is what the Lord says: ‘With these you will gore the Arameans until they are destroyed.’”

12 All the other prophets were prophesying the same thing. “Attack Ramoth Gilead and be victorious,” they said, “for the Lord will give it into the king’s hand.”

13 The messenger who had gone to summon Micaiah said to him, “Look, the other prophets without exception are predicting success for the king. Let your word agree with theirs, and speak favorably.”

14 But Micaiah said, “As surely as the Lord lives, I can tell him only what the Lord tells me.”

15 When he arrived, the king asked him, “Micaiah, shall we go to war against Ramoth Gilead, or not?”

“Attack and be victorious,” he answered, “for the Lord will give it into the king’s hand.”

16 The king said to him, “How many times must I make you swear to tell me nothing but the truth in the name of the Lord?”

17 Then Micaiah answered, “I saw all Israel scattered on the hills like sheep without a shepherd, and the Lord said, ‘These people have no master. Let each one go home in peace.’”

18 The king of Israel said to Jehoshaphat, “Didn’t I tell you that he never prophesies anything good about me, but only bad?”

19 Micaiah continued, “Therefore hear the word of the Lord: I saw the Lord sitting on his throne with all the multitudes of heaven standing around him on his right and on his left. 20 And the Lord said, ‘Who will entice Ahab into attacking Ramoth Gilead and going to his death there?’

“One suggested this, and another that. 21 Finally, a spirit came forward, stood before the Lord and said, ‘I will entice him.’

22 “‘By what means?’ the Lord asked.

“‘I will go out and be a deceiving spirit in the mouths of all his prophets,’ he said.

“‘You will succeed in enticing him,’ said the Lord. ‘Go and do it

23 “So now the Lord has put a deceiving spirit in the mouths of all these prophets of yours. The Lord has decreed disaster for you.”


24 Then Zedekiah son of Kenaanah went up and slapped Micaiah in the face. “Which way did the spirit from[a] the Lord go when he went from me to speak to you?” he asked.

25 Micaiah replied, “You will find out on the day you go to hide in an inner room.”

26 The king of Israel then ordered, “Take Micaiah and send him back to Amon the ruler of the city and to Joash the king’s son 27 and say, ‘This is what the king says: Put this fellow in prison and give him nothing but bread and water until I return safely.’”

28 Micaiah declared, “If you ever return safely, the Lord has not spoken through me.” Then he added, “Mark my words, all you people!”

Ahab Killed at Ramoth Gilead
29 So the king of Israel and Jehoshaphat king of Judah went up to Ramoth Gilead. 30 The king of Israel said to Jehoshaphat, “I will enter the battle in disguise, but you wear your royal robes.” So the king of Israel disguised himself and went into battle.

31 Now the king of Aram had ordered his thirty-two chariot commanders, “Do not fight with anyone, small or great, except the king of Israel.” 32 When the chariot commanders saw Jehoshaphat, they thought, “Surely this is the king of Israel.” So they turned to attack him, but when Jehoshaphat cried out, 33 the chariot commanders saw that he was not the king of Israel and stopped pursuing him.

34 But someone drew his bow at random and hit the king of Israel between the sections of his armor. The king told his chariot driver, “Wheel around and get me out of the fighting. I’ve been wounded.” 35 All day long the battle raged, and the king was propped up in his chariot facing the Arameans. The blood from his wound ran onto the floor of the chariot, and that evening he died. 36 As the sun was setting, a cry spread through the army: “Every man to his town. Every man to his land!”

37 So the king died and was brought to Samaria, and they buried him there. 38 They washed the chariot at a pool in Samaria (where the prostitutes bathed), and the dogs licked up his blood, as the word of the Lord had declared.

39 As for the other events of Ahab’s reign, including all he did, the palace he built and adorned with ivory, and the cities he fortified, are they not written in the book of the annals of the kings of Israel? 40 Ahab rested with his ancestors. And Ahaziah his son succeeded him as king.


God had declared vengenence on Ahab years ago and set up the scenario actively where Ahab was going to die. And II Kings 10 shows the fulfillment of God's curse on Ahab when it came to his entire family wiped out by Jehu when the Lord anointed him through the prophet Elisha to become king.

There are many other instances in the scriptures - throughout the book of I and II Kings (as well as Judges 9, actually) - where the Lord actively condemned others and set the situations up for them to experience punishment. And that goes back to realizing the Holiness of God.

In the experience of both Saul and Ahab, those who were harmed by them and persecuted were avenged - and this is something I've seen others in the WOF MOvement speak on when it comes to God's judgment on those who harm His people. Other founders in WOF such as Jerry Savelle (of the book "If Satan Can't Steal Your Joy" ) spoke on the subject before when it comes to the Hand of God for Blessing or Judgment - noting that "The hand of God will bring judgement against your adversary and great blessing to you!" - and More was shared on that in his book Called to Battle Destined to Win and "The Favor of God" as well as in the following:
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Gxg (G²)

Pilgrim/Monastic on the Road to God (Psalm 84:1-7)
Site Supporter
Jan 25, 2009
19,765
1,429
Good Ol' South...
Visit site
✟187,250.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
How could He present Himself as the moral judge of the universe if He moves people to sin, including self murder.
I think it helps to remember that death is death - and judgment is judgment.

It speaks a lot of God's character when it comes to him not allowing His Holiness to be affronted - and there were a number of ways God could have taken out Saul actively. He already did so directly in the OT on a number of occasions - one of them being directly after people chosen to represent Him defamed his sanctuary and he placed them to death:

Leviticus 10:16
New International Version (NIV)

The Death of Nadab and Abihu
10 Aaron’s sons Nadab and Abihu took their censers, put fire in them and added incense; and they offered unauthorized fire before the Lord, contrary to his command. 2 So fire came out from the presence of the Lord and consumed them, and they died before the Lord. 3 Moses then said to Aaron, “This is what the Lord spoke of when he said:

“‘Among those who approach me
I will be proved holy;
in the sight of all the people
I will be honored.’”
Aaron remained silent.

4 Moses summoned Mishael and Elzaphan, sons of Aaron’s uncle Uzziel, and said to them, “Come here; carry your cousins outside the camp, away from the front of the sanctuary.” 5 So they came and carried them, still in their tunics, outside the camp, as Moses ordered.

6 Then Moses said to Aaron and his sons Eleazar and Ithamar, “Do not let your hair become unkempt[a] and do not tear your clothes, or you will die and the Lord will be angry with the whole community. But your relatives, all the Israelites, may mourn for those the Lord has destroyed by fire.​


But there are other places this occurs besides this, in regards to King Jeroboam and the prophet sent to correct him/pronounce judgment:

I Kings 13:6-32
6 Then the king said to the man of God, “Intercede with the Lord your God and pray for me that my hand may be restored.” So the man of God interceded with the Lord, and the king’s hand was restored and became as it was before.

7 The king said to the man of God, “Come home with me for a meal, and I will give you a gift.”

8 But the man of God answered the king, “Even if you were to give me half your possessions, I would not go with you, nor would I eat bread or drink water here. 9 For I was commanded by the word of the Lord: ‘You must not eat bread or drink water or return by the way you came.’” 10 So he took another road and did not return by the way he had come to Bethel.

11 Now there was a certain old prophet living in Bethel, whose sons came and told him all that the man of God had done there that day. They also told their father what he had said to the king. 12 Their father asked them, “Which way did he go?” And his sons showed him which road the man of God from Judah had taken. 13 So he said to his sons, “Saddle the donkey for me.” And when they had saddled the donkey for him, he mounted it 14 and rode after the man of God. He found him sitting under an oak tree and asked, “Are you the man of God who came from Judah?”

“I am,” he replied.

15 So the prophet said to him, “Come home with me and eat.”

16 The man of God said, “I cannot turn back and go with you, nor can I eat bread or drink water with you in this place. 17 I have been told by the word of the Lord: ‘You must not eat bread or drink water there or return by the way you came.’”

18 The old prophet answered, “I too am a prophet, as you are. And an angel said to me by the word of the Lord: ‘Bring him back with you to your house so that he may eat bread and drink water.’” (But he was lying to him.) 19 So the man of God returned with him and ate and drank in his house.

20 While they were sitting at the table, the word of the Lord came to the old prophet who had brought him back. 21 He cried out to the man of God who had come from Judah, “This is what the Lord says: ‘You have defied the word of the Lord and have not kept the command the Lord your God gave you. 22 You came back and ate bread and drank water in the place where he told you not to eat or drink. Therefore your body will not be buried in the tomb of your ancestors.’”


23 When the man of God had finished eating and drinking, the prophet who had brought him back saddled his donkey for him. 24 As he went on his way, a lion met him on the road and killed him, and his body was left lying on the road, with both the donkey and the lion standing beside it. 25 Some people who passed by saw the body lying there, with the lion standing beside the body, and they went and reported it in the city where the old prophet lived.

26 When the prophet who had brought him back from his journey heard of it, he said, “It is the man of God who defied the word of the Lord. The Lord has given him over to the lion, which has mauled him and killed him, as the word of the Lord had warned him.”

27 The prophet said to his sons, “Saddle the donkey for me,” and they did so. 28 Then he went out and found the body lying on the road, with the donkey and the lion standing beside it. The lion had neither eaten the body nor mauled the donkey. 29 So the prophet picked up the body of the man of God, laid it on the donkey, and brought it back to his own city to mourn for him and bury him. 30 Then he laid the body in his own tomb, and they mourned over him and said, “Alas, my brother!”

31 After burying him, he said to his sons, “When I die, bury me in the grave where the man of God is buried; lay my bones beside his bones. 32 For the message he declared by the word of the Lord against the altar in Bethel and against all the shrines on the high places in the towns of Samaria will certainly come true.”
I Kings 13:1-25 is one of the most stunning examples on the issue----as a prophet killed later by a lion was one that the Lord directly sent to King Jeroboam for bringing judgement on the nation of Israel with the Golden Calves/Idolatry.....and the Lord worked mightly through him, even protecting the man when the king stretched out his hand against the prophet and the king's hand was shriveled as a result. However, this prophet had been given STRICT orders not to eat or drink anything while on a mission...and later on, he died because he had listened to an old prophet who lied/claimed to have a message from God rather than listening to God Himself---choosing to follow hearsay instead. The old prophet was directed by the Lord to prophesy to the man that he'd suffer judgement.

The old man seemed to be pretty wild in the way he acted. But then again, the times were also pretty wild as well - and harsh sentences made by prophets also required harsh testing. Those who become teachers will receive a stricter judgment (James 3:1) - AND shouldn't seek the position without considering the consequences.

From what I understand, the prophet who was killed already turned down the king he just proclaimed God's judgement on due to the immense idolatry that had developed at Jeroboam's command....setting the stage for Israel to never recover. The king had his hand shriveled and the altar destroyed - visible proof that the prophecy given by the prophet was true and that he was under Divine Protection....but that had a HIGH cost since there was so much idolatry happening in the land that you couldn't afford to do something like that and mess it up by defaming God. At the prophet's words when King Jeroboam asked the prophet to come and dine with him, the prophet declared he wouldn't eat food/drink water at any costs since to eat or drink at Bethel would have suggested the prophet's willingness to participate in the illegitimate cultic activities taking place there.

And when the old prophet who spoke to him seems to have been around the block a bit and seen some history. Old folks who know the Lord tend to raise eyebrows when powerful events are done by others in God's name - and they can be very sly.

Like Church elders who may test someone with a mock argument advocating for something that's wrong to see how the younger person may respond after they may have told others to avoid things - to see if they're real. When the old prophet heard a new prophet declared judgement and had mighty signs to accompany him, it was understood that prophets had to be tested if they were to be trusted throughout the land. And when the man said invited him to dinner, it seems the old man was really in the clear since he dressed up as someone different in order to see whether the new prophet would become just as corrupt.

There do seem to be some signs that the new prophet started to become corrupt already - when the older prophet found him, he was found sitting under an oak tree (I Kings 13:14). My first thought was "Why was the prophet sitting to begin with? - You should have gotten your behind out of Bethel and kept on rolling - if you were tired, that's on you to deal with since you already noted that God had you on mission"...the man of God refused the King's invitation to rest/chill and dine because God had specifically directed him prior to his arrival that he must not stay but return to Judah.

Sometimes, the quickest way into sin is lingering in the wrong places (or taking time to take a break in places you were to break away from as quickly as possible) - and for the man of God, it probably would have been better if he had considered that he needed to sit down/rest once he got HOME rather than staying in enemy territory against God's command. The old prophet technically caught the young/zealous prophet off duty - so part of the testing started to prove negative for the young man from the beginning.

The prophet had been given strict orders from God to keep moving essentially - yet when the man of God recounted that God said that he must return home and not stay in the land, the old prophet lied to him, saying that an “angel” gave him new revelation that contradicted and overruled God’s previous direction. "An angel spoke" would be implication that the old prophet did not recieve the oracle directly from God, a situation that should have warned the man of God of the possibility that the oracle was false.

The younger prophet further failed the testing due to how he should have followed God's word instead of hearsay - for the Torah/OT noted directly how the penalty for going against God's Law is death when claiming one was a prophet.

And the younger prophet - already dishing out harsh judgement on the King of Israel for not serving the Lord (even as it concerns proclaiming death) - should have asked the Lord to confirm it. Like what Paul says in Galatians 1:8, “But even if we, or an angel from heaven, should preach to you a gospel contrary to what we have preached to you, he is to be accursed!" So - The prophet disobeyed command to not eat/drink and he experienced God’s wrath because of it. But it couldn't be confirmed whether or not he deserved to be condemned for it unless he was tested.

When you see the judgement that followed, it makes sense that the older prophet who tested him was the solid one - his proclamation came true.

For I Kings 13:16-28 shows that upon leaving, the man of God was met on the road by a lion and was brutally killed. As evidence that this event was ordered by God, the man of God’s donkey was sitting right there next to his body, not intimidated by the lion whatsoever. Evidently the donkey supernaturally knew that it had nothing to fear from the lion because this was a special supernatural act of God. Furthermore, the lion didn’t devour the body, but left it in the road and just stood by it, a behavior totally uncharacteristic of a lion. ....showing how the man was under God's judgment and that the older prophet's word was true in what He proclaimed. But when the old prophet took the body of the man of God, he mourned over him, and declared that what the man of God had prophesied concerning Jeroboam would indeed come to pass. ...confirming that the younger prophet's word was true and that others needed to take God's Wrath seriously.

And in a lot of ways, the younger prophet dying confirmed what he said to King Jeroboam on God's wrath since it made the point that even prophets sent by God to correct others will suffer the same consequences as those they condemn if they disobey the Lord/go against Him - to the King, seeing the same powerful prophet who condemned him suffering/dying should have been a sign that God meant business.

This is what another said best on the issue ( ):

_______" The Man of God is held accountable for his actions even though he is deceived. If God would rebuke the Man of God for disobedience how much more so the dissident king? The Man of God stood as a witness against Jeroboam in both life and death. The story’s true postscript comes many chapters later when the Man of God’s prophecy is fulfilled during the reign of Josiah (II Kings 23:1-30)"____________

Some have argued that the old prophet was connected with the false prophets King Jeroboam set up due to how his sons came back talking on all the signs the othe man of God did - it being the case that perhaps they knew because they were false prophets as well and were there. And in that sense, when the old prophet comes to the younger one, he didn't fully know God....and was impressed hearing what the younger prophet did - but then resorted to lying to get the man to come over to dinner. Thus, his word from the Lord was like false prophets still having God speak to them to show God's sovereignty - and I Kings 22 and Judges 9 both show where God even has control over lying spirits he commands to work for His glory when it comes to being used to test others. And the older prophet was someone who was basically corrupt but testing to see what the younger man was about - with the incident that happened in the young prophet's death in I Kings 13:31-32, it demonstrated to the old prophet the truth of the words of the man of God, and the old prophet symbolically identified himself with his colleague's message by requesting burial in the same grave

Regardless of what happened, the main point is that disobedience to any command of God, to any detail in any command, is a sin...with God punishing others via death in the OT actively. This shows God in his character as the Judge
 
Upvote 0

Gxg (G²)

Pilgrim/Monastic on the Road to God (Psalm 84:1-7)
Site Supporter
Jan 25, 2009
19,765
1,429
Good Ol' South...
Visit site
✟187,250.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
I have a different take on the wisdom of God and foreknowledge than others here it seems. I dont think we can understand this because of our being trapped within a bubble of time that only flows one way.

God lives outside of time, IMHO. He knows the end from the beginning, He is the Alpha and the Omega. That is to say, God is Omniscient, precisely because He is Omnipresent. He exists at the end of time concurrently with existing at the beginning of time. He doesn't know what is going to happen because He is prescient, He knows what is going to happen because He is already there after it happened and has seen it.

This is a concept that we can describe, but we cannot comprehend, because it is completely foreign to our concept of existence. It isn't even fair to try to comprehend it, as it is impossible. The best we can do is to simply believe it.

Peace...
I definitely feel where you're coming from. When you exist outside of time itself and are always at all places at all times, you simply know what's up. I like how one person noted that God is Transcendent - he is beyond our understanding. And God knowing the future also means He knows EVERY POSSIBILITY of what can happen - both if we don't do something and if we do something as well. It's a concept that we as finite humans cannot understand - even though we'll understand it more as time goes on and we're later glorified in being with Christ in eternity.

But there are some aspects of time which I do think can make a world of sense. As another noted best, God does not know events before they happen; he simply knows all events in an eternal now. But Eastern theologians have taken a different approach to understanding time and eternity. See David Bradshaw's article "A Christian Approach to the Philosophy of Time. (http://www.uky.edu/~dbradsh/papers/Christian Approach to Phil of Time.pdf )


As said best there in the article:

Time belongs to the created order. As Einstein might have put it: “Time is God’s way of stopping everything from happening at once.” God, as God, does not live in time, nor can his eternity be literally described in temporal terms. To speak of eternity is not to understand anything positive about God but simply to deny the importation of temporal movement into the Godhead. Even when we speak of the Deity as apprehending all of history in an eternal “now,” we have to be careful. Is not “now” qualified by “before” and “after”? We have all heard God’s relation to time characterized in this way:

image001_zpse3008887.jpg

But it’s only an image. When we speak of divine eternity, we really do not know what we are talking about. Speculate as we may, we cannot conceive the relationship between God in his timelessness and the world in its timefulness. It’s infinitely more difficult than trying to imagine the encounter between two- and three-dimensional beings. “Eternity” is an apophatic term that introduces us to the incomprehensible mystery of the uncreated Creator.
 
Upvote 0

Gxg (G²)

Pilgrim/Monastic on the Road to God (Psalm 84:1-7)
Site Supporter
Jan 25, 2009
19,765
1,429
Good Ol' South...
Visit site
✟187,250.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
1 Corinthians: 3. 19. For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. For it is written, He taketh the wise in their own craftiness. 20. And again, The Lord knoweth the thoughts of the wise, that they are vain. 21. Therefore let no man glory in men. For all things are yours; - Bible Offline
God is beyond our comprehension - and it's amazing to see what He's about :)
 
Upvote 0

Gxg (G²)

Pilgrim/Monastic on the Road to God (Psalm 84:1-7)
Site Supporter
Jan 25, 2009
19,765
1,429
Good Ol' South...
Visit site
✟187,250.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
The New Testament confirms the Flood and Sodom and Gomorrah.
2 Peter: 2. 4. For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment; 5. And spared not the old world, but saved Noah the eighth person, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood upon the world of the ungodly; 6. And turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrha into ashes condemned them with an overthrow, making them an ensample unto those that after should live ungodly;

Any supernatural hybrid mutants would have been destroyed.
Genesis: 7. 21. And all flesh died that moved upon the earth, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of beast, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth, and every man: 22. All in whose nostrils was the breath of life, of all that was in the dry land, died. 23. And every living substance was destroyed which was upon the face of the ground, both man, and cattle, and the creeping things, and the fowl of the heaven; and they were destroyed from the earth: and Noah only remained alive, and they that were with him in the ark.


Here are the generation's of post flood people who were cursed by Noah.
This includes Canaanites and Sodom and Gomorrah.

Genesis: 10. 6. And the sons of Ham; Cush, and Mizraim, and Phut, and Canaan. 7. And the sons of Cush; Seba, and Havilah, and Sabtah, and Raamah, and Sabtecha: and the sons of Raamah; Sheba, and Dedan. 8. And Cush begat Nimrod: he began to be a mighty one in the earth. 9. He was a mighty hunter before the LORD: wherefore it is said, Even as Nimrod the mighty hunter before the LORD. 10. And the beginning of his kingdom was Babel, and Erech, and Accad, and Calneh, in the land of Shinar. 11. Out of that land went forth Asshur, and builded Nineveh, and the city Rehoboth, and Calah, 12. And Resen between Nineveh and Calah: the same is a great city. 13. And Mizraim begat Ludim, and Anamim, and Lehabim, and Naphtuhim, 14. And Pathrusim, and Casluhim, (out of whom came Philistim,) and Caphtorim. 15. And Canaan begat Sidon his firstborn, and Heth, 16. And the Jebusite, and the Amorite, and the Girgasite, 17. And the Hivite, and the Arkite, and the Sinite, 18. And the Arvadite, and the Zemarite, and the Hamathite: and afterward were the families of the Canaanites spread abroad. 19. And the border of the Canaanites was from Sidon, as thou comest to Gerar, unto Gaza; as thou goest, unto Sodom, and Gomorrah, and Admah, and Zeboim, even unto Lasha. 20. These are the sons of Ham, after their families, after their tongues, in their countries, and in their nations.

The Nephilim are still here, unfortunately. Just recently listened to Brother G.Craig Lewis on the issue of the ways the Nephilim were about - and it was truly powerful.

If wishing to listen, one can go to the following:



And for the others which broke down the issue very plainly with the ways the agenda is still here:




I'm not certain if Fredrick Price Jr. heard of the message Brother Lewis made, even though they do ministry together...and he did one of his recent presentations at the Faith Dome .

But it's still timely....
 
Upvote 0

victoryword

Senior Veteran
Jul 11, 2003
4,000
240
62
Visit site
✟27,870.00
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
as I stated in the OP of my "holy wars" thread, I am in the process of writing a unique daily devotional titled "Vindicating God". The devotions are centered on refuting the accusations by people in and outside of the body of Christ against God. I will deal with some of these "causative versus permissive" issues in this devotional (as well as other things pertaining to God's character). Here is one on Jesus that fits with this discussion:
=======================================================

May 2

Harsh Sayings of Jesus: Causing Family Strife​

Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. And a man's foes shall be they of his own household (Matt. 10:34-36)

How is it that the “Prince of peace” (Isa. 9:6) would be the cause division? Would He exert His omnipotent power to manipulate families to hate one another? Some might read it this way. However, this is another case of the Hebrew idiom in which God is said to be the cause of that which He merely allowed to happen. One old commentary, in its section on idioms, explains this well:

These words, if understood as ordinary English, express the very opposite of the real design of our Lord's coming. He came to unite the whole human family in love to God, and in love one to another. At his birth the angels sang, “Glory to God in the highest, on earth peace, good-will towards men.” When He, the Prince of Peace, shall reign universally, the “nations shall beat their swords into plough stares, and their spears into pruning-hooks, and shall learn war no more.” Yet his coming did cause sons to rise up against their fathers, and daughters against their mothers. Whenever a member of a Jewish family professed himself a disciple of Christ, he soon experienced the fulfilment of his Master's words, “They shall put you out of the synagogues; yea, the time cometh that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service” (John xvi. 2). The result of our Lord's coming was, in all these cases, the very opposite of his intention; yet his words, if interpreted literally, declare that his object in coming was to produce variance and strife.

Spalding, Thomas Scripture Difficulties, Explained by Scripture References: Or, The Bible Its Own Interpreter (London: Daldy, Isbister, and Co., 1877), pp. 316, 317

When we understand the language of Scripture, our Lord’s “harshness” does not appear to be so harsh after all.​

I think that this answers the issue once and for all, don't you?
 
  • Like
Reactions: dkbwarrior
Upvote 0

Truthfrees

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 20, 2015
13,793
2,912
✟299,688.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Word of Faith
as I stated in the OP of my "holy wars" thread, I am in the process of writing a unique daily devotional titled "Vindicating God". The devotions are centered on refuting the accusations by people in and outside of the body of Christ against God. I will deal with some of these "causative versus permissive" issues in this devotional (as well as other things pertaining to God's character). Here is one on Jesus that fits with this discussion:
=======================================================

May 2

Harsh Sayings of Jesus: Causing Family Strife​

Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. And a man's foes shall be they of his own household (Matt. 10:34-36)

How is it that the “Prince of peace” (Isa. 9:6) would be the cause division? Would He exert His omnipotent power to manipulate families to hate one another? Some might read it this way. However, this is another case of the Hebrew idiom in which God is said to be the cause of that which He merely allowed to happen. One old commentary, in its section on idioms, explains this well:

These words, if understood as ordinary English, express the very opposite of the real design of our Lord's coming. He came to unite the whole human family in love to God, and in love one to another. At his birth the angels sang, “Glory to God in the highest, on earth peace, good-will towards men.” When He, the Prince of Peace, shall reign universally, the “nations shall beat their swords into plough stares, and their spears into pruning-hooks, and shall learn war no more.” Yet his coming did cause sons to rise up against their fathers, and daughters against their mothers. Whenever a member of a Jewish family professed himself a disciple of Christ, he soon experienced the fulfilment of his Master's words, “They shall put you out of the synagogues; yea, the time cometh that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service” (John xvi. 2). The result of our Lord's coming was, in all these cases, the very opposite of his intention; yet his words, if interpreted literally, declare that his object in coming was to produce variance and strife.

Spalding, Thomas Scripture Difficulties, Explained by Scripture References: Or, The Bible Its Own Interpreter (London: Daldy, Isbister, and Co., 1877), pp. 316, 317

When we understand the language of Scripture, our Lord’s “harshness” does not appear to be so harsh after all.​

I think that this answers the issue once and for all, don't you?
IOW, the words of the Lord Jesus Christ were prophesying that even though His intention was to bring peace, as people believed in Him, it would create a war with unbelievers?

The spiritual war you were talking about in another thread?
 
Upvote 0

victoryword

Senior Veteran
Jul 11, 2003
4,000
240
62
Visit site
✟27,870.00
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
IOW, the words of the Lord Jesus Christ were prophesying that even though His intention was to bring peace, as people believed in Him, it would create a war with unbelievers?

The spiritual war you were talking about in another thread?

Very true TruthFrees :thumbsup:
 
Upvote 0

victoryword

Senior Veteran
Jul 11, 2003
4,000
240
62
Visit site
✟27,870.00
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
Hi TruthFrees

Thank you for the welcome back. Been busy writing as you can see :D

The books are not really a compilation of what I wrote on this thread but they do address the very issues brought up on the thread. But the same Biblical insights I related on this thread can be found in those books, only more "professionally" written.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Truthfrees
Upvote 0