Global Warming

[createdtoworship]

??? Please make your point a little more clear.

you call it a sand bar, however my sources call it an island. You fail to disprove this point.

 

[Paul of Eugene OR]

you call it a sand bar, however my sources call it an island. You fail to disprove this point.

Did you even read the article you yourself linked everybody to? Here is the second sentence:

"Nicknamed Shelly Island by locals because of the large number of shells on it, the mile-long sand bank appeared over the last couple of months."

 

[createdtoworship]

Did you even read the article you yourself linked everybody to? Here is the second sentence:

"Nicknamed Shelly Island by locals because of the large number of shells on it, the mile-long sand bank appeared over the last couple of months."

yeah the one with a title that an island formed? yes I did. here is another one for you:

Massive Iceberg Breaks Off Antarctica — But Not Because of Climate Change in response to your link that glaciers are retreating. https://www.usgs.gov/centers/norock...ce_center_objects=0#qt-science_center_objects


now I am not fully against global warming to begin with, I never said I was in fact. I am just pointing out how easily facts can get backwards. Also there is evidence that the world goes through various heating and cooling cycles. The ice age was a cooling cycle. The days of noah, a heating cycle. came a few hundred years after the flood of noah. While most of the population was at babel.

more info here:
When Was the Ice Age in Biblical History?

 

[createdtoworship]

 

[Paul of Eugene OR]

yeah the one with a title that an island formed? yes I did. here is another one for you:

Massive Iceberg Breaks Off Antarctica — But Not Because of Climate Change in response to your link that glaciers are retreating. https://www.usgs.gov/centers/norock...ce_center_objects=0#qt-science_center_objects


now I am not fully against global warming to begin with, I never said I was in fact. I am just pointing out how easily facts can get backwards. Also there is evidence that the world goes through various heating and cooling cycles. The ice age was a cooling cycle. The days of noah, a heating cycle. came a few hundred years after the flood of noah. While most of the population was at babel.

more info here:
When Was the Ice Age in Biblical History?

Yes, they called that accumulation of sand an island. Isn't it an island, after all, for all that it was formed by accumulating sand?

Oh sure, we did lose a hunk of ice the size of the state of Delaware from the Ross Ice Shelf, but surely that's not a sign of global warming. And the shrinking ice cap at the North Pole has actually allowed a few ships to take short cuts across the top of the world where that used to be impossible . . . but don't worry, surely its not a sign of global warming. After all, if there was global warming, wouldn't they have to shift the maps about where to plant what species of garden plants further north? They didn't ever do that, did they?

 

[JackRT]

For months scientists in Antarctica have been following a crack in the Larson ice shelf. At 70 miles long, an iceberg dubbed A68 has broken away. It is double the volume of Lake Erie. But don't worry. It is not global warming. Nope. Yessiree, for sure, not global warming.

 

[createdtoworship]

Yes, they called that accumulation of sand an island. Isn't it an island, after all, for all that it was formed by accumulating sand?

Oh sure, we did lose a hunk of ice the size of the state of Delaware from the Ross Ice Shelf, but surely that's not a sign of global warming. And the shrinking ice cap at the North Pole has actually allowed a few ships to take short cuts across the top of the world where that used to be impossible . . . but don't worry, surely its not a sign of global warming. After all, if there was global warming, wouldn't they have to shift the maps about where to plant what species of garden plants further north? They didn't ever do that, did they?

seriously who cares about global warming. At best we have subtropics everywhere. Would not, that be awesome? I don't like how people warn about co2 emissions, when watering your lawn releases more greenhouse gas than a month of driving a car.

besides here are many that agree with me on this:

List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming - Wikipedia

 

[createdtoworship]

Yes, they called that accumulation of sand an island. Isn't it an island, after all, for all that it was formed by accumulating sand?

Oh sure, we did lose a hunk of ice the size of the state of Delaware from the Ross Ice Shelf, but surely that's not a sign of global warming. And the shrinking ice cap at the North Pole has actually allowed a few ships to take short cuts across the top of the world where that used to be impossible . . . but don't worry, surely its not a sign of global warming. After all, if there was global warming, wouldn't they have to shift the maps about where to plant what species of garden plants further north? They didn't ever do that, did they?

I like your redefinition of island" that caters to your bias.

 

[Paul of Eugene OR]

I like your redefinition of island" that caters to your bias.

It appeared in a span of a few months, its made of sand, and you think this is NOT an example of sand accumulating?

 

[Paul of Eugene OR]

seriously who cares about global warming. At best we have subtropics everywhere. Would not, that be awesome? I don't like how people warn about co2 emissions, when watering your lawn releases more greenhouse gas than a month of driving a car.

besides here are many that agree with me on this:

List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming - Wikipedia

I found this in your posted link:

These findings [supporting global warming caused by humans] are recognized by the national science academies of all the major industrialized nations;[9] the consensus has strengthened over time[10] and is now virtually unanimous.[11] The level of consensus correlates with expertise in climate science.[12]

You science deniers are responsible for holding back the remedies that will save lives and property.

 

[createdtoworship]

I found this in your posted link:

These findings [supporting global warming caused by humans] are recognized by the national science academies of all the major industrialized nations;[9] the consensus has strengthened over time[10] and is now virtually unanimous.[11] The level of consensus correlates with expertise in climate science.[12]

You science deniers are responsible for holding back the remedies that will save lives and property.

maybe this will help your confusions:

Research Team Slams Global Warming Data In New Report: "Not Reality... Totally Inconsistent With Credible Temperature Data" | Zero Hedge

 

[Paul of Eugene OR]

maybe this will help your confusions:

Research Team Slams Global Warming Data In New Report: "Not Reality... Totally Inconsistent With Credible Temperature Data" | Zero Hedge

You located an alt facts site that supports your opinion, which is not a surprise that you can do that.

 

[Mountainmanbob]

The Bible says to not be anxious and worrying about the world is a big waste of time God has his hand on everything and it will happen exactly as He wishes.

M-Bob

 

[JackRT]

The Bible says to not be anxious and worrying about the world is a big waste of time God has his hand on everything and it will happen exactly as He wishes.

M-Bob

So if mankind gets its act together and solves global warming, that will be exactly what God wished? I am reminded of:

"If God had decreed from all eternity that a certain person should die of smallpox, it would be a frightful sin to avoid and annul that decree by the trick of vaccination." --- Timothy Dwight, Congregationalist minister and President of Yale University from 1795 to 1817.

 

[createdtoworship]

You located an alt facts site that supports your opinion, which is not a surprise that you can do that.

please address the facts and not the person. This is an ad hominem fallacy.

 

[Paul of Eugene OR]

please address the facts and not the person. This is an ad hominem fallacy.

OK Here's a nice chart for you to interpret.

 

[createdtoworship]

Tha

OK Here's a nice chart for you to interpret.

these are exactly the types of non peer reviewed studies that are false the above study says.

 

[Paul of Eugene OR]

Tha
these are exactly the types of non peer reviewed studies that are false the above study says.

False, eh? Not peer reviewed, eh? How about this animation of plant zone changes, published for your garden planning purposes:

https://www.arborday.org/media/mapchanges.cfm

 

[createdtoworship]

False, eh? Not peer reviewed, eh? How about this animation of plant zone changes, published for your garden planning purposes:

https://www.arborday.org/media/mapchanges.cfm

not peer review. My sources were official sources that were peer reviewed, to weed out the noise, bias, and political motives from the studies.

 

[createdtoworship]

False, eh? Not peer reviewed, eh? How about this animation of plant zone changes, published for your garden planning purposes:

https://www.arborday.org/media/mapchanges.cfm

I bet if you compare three such maps, that you will not find a perfect match in any of them. Because they are not peer reviewed.