Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
In science, theories are not true by concept alone but must be verifiable.
The same goes for those who hypothesized that increased CO2 in earth's atmosphere will bring about an increase in earths global temperature.
In science, theories are not true by concept alone but must be verifiable.
The same goes for those who hypothesized that increased CO2 in earth's atmosphere will bring about an increase in earths global temperature.
Predictions are a key component to verifying if a scientific theory seems fundamentally correct.
However, with the CO2 induced global warming theory the numerious literature recorded predictions have all failed.
There is now a website to bring attention to these failed predictions made by many CAGW proponents, as listed below.
Failed climate predictions gets a website | Watts Up With That?
..
Twisting science to project that the earth is now Catastrophically warming due to CO2 is Alarmism.
The consequences of climate change become increasingly bad after each additional degree of warming, with the consequences of 2°C being quite damaging and the consequences of 4°C being potentially catastrophic.
Let us save the readers of this thread from statements of ignorance, Heissonear - the effects of global warming have been observed.Let's save civilisation from something that has not been observed.
There are many lines of independent empirical evidence for global warming, from accelerated ice loss from the Arctic to Antarctica to the poleward migration of plant and animal species across the globe.
Wrong, Heissonear, you do not have to look far for examples of people who are ignorant about scienceYou do not need to look far for examples of those who are deviously promoting CAGW.
This is nonsense. The claim is wrong. The scientists didnt manipulate the data, they processed it. Thats a very different thing. And the reason they do it isnt hard to understand.
Imagine you want to measure the daily temperature in a field near a town. You want to make sure the measurements you get arent affected by whether its cloudy or sunnydirect sunlight on the thermometer will increase the temperature you measureso you set it up in a reflective box. Look: Right away youve adjusted the temperature, even before youve taken a measurement! Youve made sure an outside influence doesnt affect your data adversely. Thats a good thing.
Climate science is science and so there are testable, falsifiable predictions. The simplest is that an increase in CO2 will cause global warming. We have measuredIn science, theories are not true by concept alone but must be verifiable.
.Let us save the readers of this thread from statements of ignorance, Heissonear - the effects of global warming have been observed.
Evidence for global warming
The cycles of warming and cooling over the past 3000 years, even as recorded by civilizations, shows how natural climate variables control earth's temperature swings.
You seem to have forgotten how nature controls the swings in earths surface temperatures.
..
You wish such was real evidence for AGW!
The Globe Is Not Warming scamsters at Watt's Up With That are providing a paranoid conspiracy theory for weak-minded people frightened by reality. It is the frightened that flock to Heartland Institute conferences and websites, the frightened that shout "Nothing to see here!" in echo chambers every time a new scientific data set confirms the world is warming, Spring arrives earlier, winter later, and gradually the glaciers and polar ice retreats. It is the frightened who come onto websites like this and become stubborn internet trolls unwilling to listen to reality. It's just sad, especially when those people deceiving themselves claim the name of Christ. It's not a good look!The embodiment and works of the IPCC as the most clear example of the "Catastrophic Global Warming" scam!
.The Globe Is Not Warming scamsters at Watt's Up With That are providing a paranoid conspiracy theory for weak-minded people frightened by reality. It is the frightened that flock to Heartland Institute conferences and websites, the frightened that shout "Nothing to see here!" in echo chambers every time a new scientific data set confirms the world is warming, Spring arrives earlier, winter later, and gradually the glaciers and polar ice retreats. It is the frightened who come onto websites like this and become stubborn internet trolls unwilling to listen to reality. It's just sad, especially when those people deceiving themselves claim the name of Christ. It's not a good look!
.
When are you going to stop following what men say and make intelligent observations of the natural world yourself?
Observing the natural world is how I grew up, and relates to the college degree I have and occupational work I perform for the past 34 years.
You should learn from nature, not just from men.
When you look at nature and its systems of cooling, warming, physical display of conduction-convection-massive atmospheric and ocean currents-and the like, the additional ~150 ppm CO2 placed in the atmosphere by man has no noticeable effect on the earth TEMPERATURE. In particular CATASTROPHIC WARMING!!!
I ignored the paranoia and ignorance about the IPCC in the OP the first time I looked at it but this has raised its ugly head againThe embodiment and works of the IPCC as the most clear example of the "Catastrophic Global Warming" scam!
...snipped more paranoia and ignorance...
Natural variability still controls the earths climate and weather.
You should learn from nature, not just from men. You should observe nature, learn by observing nature, and over time learn about weather and climate dynamics. Not headlines and men's words.
..
Mixture, again.
The Berkeley Earth group concluded that the warming trend is real, that over the past 50 years (between the decades of the 1950s and 2000s) the land surface warmed by 0.91±0.05°C, and their results mirrors those obtained from earlier studies carried out by the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the Hadley Centre, NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) Surface Temperature Analysis, and the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia. The study also found that the urban heat island effect and poor station quality did not bias the results obtained from these earlier studies.[10][11][12][13]
Berkeley Earth has constructed an estimate of the global average temperature during 2014, including land and sea. The key findings are:
1. The global surface temperature average (land and sea) for 2014 was nominally the warmest since the global instrumental record began in 1850; however, within the margin of error, it is tied with 2005 and 2010 and so we cant be certain it set a new record.
2. For the land, 2014 was nominally the 4th warmest year since 1753 (when the land surface temperature record began)
3. For the sea, 2014 was the warmest year on record since 1850
4. For the contiguous United States, 2014 ranked nominally as the 38th warmest year on record since 1850.
Past climate changes are analogs, albeit imperfect ones, for our modern climate change. Despite the differences between such episodes and today, they tell us a great deal about how the Earth-atmosphere-ocean-ice-vegetation-climate system responds to perturbations of the carbon cycle. Global warming in the Miocene at 16.9 million years ago is a mild example.
You mean that same nature that you're stubbornly refusing to see? Dude, the words of men don't make glaciers retreat up mountainsides or spring arrive early. But the CO2 of man does..
Mixture, again.
When are you going to stop following what men say and make intelligent observations of the natural world yourself?
Observing the natural world is how I grew up, and relates to the college degree I have and occupational work I perform for the past 34 years.
Natural variability still controls the earths climate and weather. You should learn from nature, not just from men. You should observe nature, learn by observing nature, and over time learn about weather and climate dynamics. Not headlines and men's words.
It should stay in focus that the recently created "Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming" statements and predictions should all be, well, the Catastrophic Warming of the entire earth by man. Not about misinformation and hype.
When you look at nature and its systems of cooling, warming, physical display of conduction-convection-massive atmospheric and ocean currents-and the like, the additional ~150 ppm CO2 placed in the atmosphere by man has no noticeable effect on the earth TEMPERATURE. In particular CATASTROPHIC WARMING!!!
It ain't happening. Put the propaganda down. Stop the hype like it is happening. Look around for yourself.
Forum on climate change postponed due to snow
Yes, cold and snow now means proof of Global Warming.
https://tallbloke.wordpress.com/2015/02/11/forum-on-climate-change-postponed-due-to-snow/
USGS Repeat Photography Project Documents Retreating Glaciers in Glacier National Park | Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center (NOROCK)Global Climate Change Background
Lisa McKeon compares early 1900 image of Iceberg Glacier with present photo location.
Glacier National Park’s namesake glaciers have receded rapidly since the Park’s establishment in 1910, primarily due to long-term changes in regional and global climate. In the last century, the five warmest years have occurred in the last 8 years - in this order: 2005, 1998, 2002, 2003, 2004 (NASA). These changes include warming, particularly of daily minimum temperatures, and persistent droughts. This warming is ongoing and the loss of the Park’s glaciers continues, with the park’s glaciers predicted to disappear by 2030.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?