Global Warming is a Scam

[hurste1951]

It can be objectively noticed CAGW promoters have created a hypothesis that is impossible to falsify.

Not really. But if people like YOU keep telling everyone that they only look at CO2 then of course it can seem confusing.

Perhaps if you stopped misrepresenting what the scientists actually DO study it would be less confusing.

The fundamental reason is since the beginning CAGW bias climate scientists have never framed and then subtracted the natural factors controlling weather events from said +150 ppm atmospheric CO2 induced climatic events.

^^^^THIS HAS NOW BEEN SHOWN TO BE INCORRECT NUMEROUS TIMES.

If Heissonear would look at the science he'd know that.

 

[Heissonear]

Dude, I want to be BORED by climate science, I really do! I want it to be that boring thing we solved in the 2020's and is so ho hum. I want it to be like Smallpox, or lead poisoning from petrol, or the CFC-hole in the Ozone layer which is slowly repairing itself. I want it to belong to the history of scary things that we solved so we could move on to the next thing. I want that for my kids. We can solve this, easily.

There are fantastic new nuclear reactors that burn nuclear waste, and could turn a 100,000 year nuclear-waste storage problem into 1000 years of clean energy for America! Once we stop burning coal, we'll not only stop cooking the planet, but will limit the carcinogenic particles in the air. Your national health bill will decrease by 10% which is almost equal to your electricity bill! (In other words, coal companies are not only getting away with murder, but their electricity is not as 'cheap' as some people think! It's about double the cost because of the additional health bill!)

But we're not solving it fast enough because unthinking conspiracy theorists like yourself keep gathering around scary internet chat-rooms where you all tell Big Brother stories to each other. Sorry. There's no big brother in this. Just science.

Once again, I DARE YOU to watch this! 90 seconds in, and it only goes for a few minutes. Watch the candle. Do not be afraid of the light! You'll SEE what CO2 can do!
This Year’s Model | Climate Denial Crock of the Week

.

Still waiting to her you explain your Alarmism statements, including in your signature.

Twisting atmospheric science with zeal is major components of the Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming Scam.

Explain the doom and gloom to come, and "use science to do so" if you want.

.

 

[hurste1951]

.

Still waiting to her you explain your Alarmism statements, including in your signature.

What right do YOU have to demand ANYONE address any question you have??? You usually ignore people who point out YOUR errors. And you then re-post your error!

This hypocrisy is weird.

Twisting atmospheric science with zeal is major components of the Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming Scam.

How would YOU know what is "twisted" in science you clearly don't even read or understand????

 

[Heissonear]

Global Warming is now so serious I am convinced that we will have to use SPICE** to save civilisation. Our grandchildren may be forced to paint the skies white! Blue skies may not be permitted for many centuries to come! Clean energy has been too little too late. We have failed. Our grandchildren will curse us for ignorant fools.

.


Alarmism is easy to see in Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming promoters .


The statement above is Alarmism , full of doom and gloom.

"Save civilisation"!!!

When are you and others going to face up to promoting Alarmism?


.

 

[Loudmouth]

.


Alarmism is easy to see in Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming promoters .


The statement above is Alarmism , full of doom and gloom.

"Save civilisation"!!!

When are you and others going to face up to promoting Alarmism?


.

We are promoting science and common sense, both of which you either lack or don't understand.

 

[hurste1951]

When are you and others going to face up to promoting Alarmism?

MAYBE the minute you actually get some of this science correct and make a point that can't be easily shot down in about 5 minutes.

 

[eclipsenow]

.

Still waiting to her you explain your Alarmism statements, including in your signature.

Twisting atmospheric science with zeal is major components of the Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming Scam.

Explain the doom and gloom to come, and "use science to do so" if you want.

.

You know what? You're not worth it. You're lying to yourself, and searing your conscience with all these lies. It's got to show up in your character at some point. Seriously mate, if you value integrity and honesty, ask yourself how much your upbringing and politics have influenced your stance on this. I know too many Christians in climate science to believe they're all in on some 'conspiracy', and that is what you have to reduce this to. You're out there with the Moon Landing was faked whackos: a real tinfoil hat wearing intellectual!

And my sig? That just shows I'm open to various climate solutions, like Integral Fast Reactors that can supply America with 1000 years of energy by burning your nuclear waste! Or like White Skies, which mimics the effect of volcanoes.

Dude, the science is settled. Your objections to it are appallingly deluded and petty, and the fact that you continue on this quest either means you're just a lonely guy that's addicted to negative attention (which, let's face it, is better than no attention) or seriously deluded that you're going to convince these smarter folk here that they're wrong. Give it up.

 

[Heissonear]

You know what? You're not worth it. You're lying to yourself, and searing your conscience with all these lies. It's got to show up in your character at some point. Seriously mate, if you value integrity and honesty, ask yourself how much your upbringing and politics have influenced your stance on this. I know too many Christians in climate science to believe they're all in on some 'conspiracy', and that is what you have to reduce this to. You're out there with the Moon Landing was faked whackos: a real tinfoil hat wearing intellectual!

And my sig? That just shows I'm open to various climate solutions, like Integral Fast Reactors that can supply America with 1000 years of energy by burning your nuclear waste! Or like White Skies, which mimics the effect of volcanoes.

Dude, the science is settled. Your objections to it are appallingly deluded and petty, and the fact that you continue on this quest either means you're just a lonely guy that's addicted to negative attention (which, let's face it, is better than no attention) or seriously deluded that you're going to convince these smarter folk here that they're wrong. Give it up.

.

A lot of "mixture". And insight in to what you "trust".

Science has not produced Climate Alarmism.


.

 

[Heissonear]

"Dude, the science is settled" [about CAGW]

Promoting CAGW Bandwagon propaganda?

.

 

[Loudmouth]

"Dude, the science is settled" [about CAGW]

Promoting CAGW Bandwagon propaganda?

.

Ignoring the science?

 

[rambot]

It's hard to argue with someone who is wrong but has no response when you show them how he/she is wrong.

 

[hurste1951]

It's hard to argue with someone who is wrong but has no response when you show them how he/she is wrong.

That's why it's not an "argument". The important thing is to show others who are reading that Heissonear may not have the answers. Just because he states them forcefully the most important thing for people to note is that he is obviously TERRIFIED of engaging with people who have the same education (or more) than he does.

I'm also a geochemist by training. And he normally doesn't even respond to my points (he's scared). He's learning to avoid [serious] and RickG because they also are scientists who disagree with him.

Heissonear is posting less now presumably because we have stood in the way of his tide of excrement. He'll have to go elsewhere. Hopefully others similarly armed will be able to stop the flood there. He'll be back online in a short while though.

They usually can't keep quite that long. And we'll all be around to show him up at that time as well.

 

[Heissonear]

You do not need to look far for examples of those who are deviously promoting CAGW.

When future generations look back on the global warming scare of the past 30 years, nothing will shock them more than the extent to which the official temperature records – on which the entire panic ultimately rested – were systematically “adjusted” to show the Earth as having warmed much more than the actual data justified.

Two weeks ago, under the headline “How we are being tricked by flawed data on global warming”, I wrote about Paul Homewood, who, on his Notalotofpeopleknowthat blog, had checked the published temperature graphs for three weather stations in Paraguay against the temperatures that had originally been recorded. In each instance, the actual trend of 60 years of data had been dramatically reversed, so that a cooling trend was changed to one that showed a marked warming.

This was only the latest of many examples of a practice long recognised by expert observers around the world – one that raises an ever larger question mark over the entire official surface-temperature record.

Following my last article, Homewood checked a swathe of other South American weather stations around the original three. In each case he found the same suspicious one-way “adjustments”. First these were made by the US government’s Global Historical Climate Network (GHCN). They were then amplified by two of the main official surface records, the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (Giss) and the National Climate Data Center (NCDC), which use the warming trends to estimate temperatures across the vast regions of the Earth where no measurements are taken. Yet these are the very records on which scientists and politicians rely for their belief in “global warming”.

Homewood has now turned his attention to the weather stations across much of the Arctic, between Canada (51 degrees W) and the heart of Siberia (87 degrees E). Again, in nearly every case, the same one-way adjustments have been made, to show warming up to 1 degree C or more higher than was indicated by the data that was actually recorded. This has surprised no one more than Trausti Jonsson, who was long in charge of climate research for the Iceland met office (and with whom Homewood has been in touch). Jonsson was amazed to see how the new version completely “disappears” Iceland’s “sea ice years” around 1970, when a period of extreme cooling almost devastated his country’s economy.

https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wor...dling-with-temperature-records-in-the-arctic/

.

 

[Justatruthseeker]

You do not need to look far for examples of those who are deviously promoting CAGW.



https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wor...dling-with-temperature-records-in-the-arctic/

.

Couldn't agree more.

Their own "published" data.

And then tell us 2014 was the hottest on record.

 

[eclipsenow]

Couldn't agree more.

Their own "published" data.

And then tell us 2014 was the hottest on record.

What a lovely graph! Pity it isn't sourced to an official database!
If you want to be taken seriously, please link to official sources and explain which data set it came from. But what really amazes me is how committed a bunch of Christians are to this paranoid lie that climate science is all fake! How stubborn and obstinate are you lot over there in America? Denialism's also strong here in Australia, but in Europe it's on the decline. People tend to respect science. But America? Must be something in the water: evolution & climate science are both 'fake'. Just... wow. I take my hat off to the sheer stubbornness of your political views. You know it's politics, right? You're letting your political worldview control what science you will accept. That's just sad. Government laws are just tools to guide the economy in the right direction: they don't have to represent 'big' government.

Coal kills an estimated 7 million people a year by burning it. We need it for smelting steel, but can easily replace it for energy with modern, waste-eating nukes. Coal, oil, and gas will run out one day. So why not start weaning our economy off it now? Why not make American more energy secure for the long haul? Why kill yourselves in smog and raise your health bill 10% (which some say is so much money it costs the same as your coal, effectively DOUBLING the price of your coal anyway!)

But of course, you denialists have thought about all this as well, haven't you?

 

[Heissonear]

.

Deceitfully adjusting numbers to major weather databases.

And some would like to make it appear of no importance.


.

 

[Loudmouth]

.

Deceitfully adjusting numbers to major weather databases.

So far only Whitewash to make it appear of no importance.


.

Perhaps you could outline the deceitful methodology?

 

[eclipsenow]

.

Deceitfully adjusting numbers to major weather databases.

And some would like to make it appear of no importance.

Blab blah blab. Nothing nothing nothing.

 

[rambot]

.

Deceitfully adjusting numbers to major weather databases.

And some would like to make it appear of no importance.


.

Do you remember posting about that a few pages back?

 

[Heissonear]

In science, theories are not true by concept alone but must be verifiable.

The same goes for those who hypothesized that increased CO2 in earth's atmosphere will bring about an increase in earths global temperature.

Predictions are a key component to verifying if a scientific theory seems fundamentally correct.

However, with the CO2 induced global warming theory the numerious literature recorded predictions have all failed.

There is now a website to bring attention to these failed predictions made by many CAGW proponents, as listed below.

From climatechangepredictions.org, where the proprietor writes: I’ve started a website with the idea of making it entertaining as well as informative. The website presents global warming predictions that have been made over the past 40 or so years

Failed climate predictions gets a website | Watts Up With That?

.