Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
very true but I think that we all know that they will only report it if they absolutely are forced to because it does not fit the liberal agenda.
Yes. And I dearly wish that the people who pretend to know all about what's going on would do some study of the events before posting. That would save some of them from having to express their astonishment later on.
CNN still deserves some healthy scepticism. Luckily, they're not alone in reporting this.It is not quite like that. Trump was unique. In the over two hundred years of Presidents he is definitely one of the three worst. CNN was not that bad when Bush was President. Trump had the strange ability to make almost everyone worse.
Perhaps. And one needs to remember, it was their television that suffered when it came to political bias. Their web sourced news did not show the same bias. When listed separately the website was always well within the green zone.CNN still deserves some healthy scepticism. Luckily, they're not alone in reporting this.
In a few minutes as I am writing this, Joe Biden is scheduled to deliver a January 6 address to the nation.
This is the man who promised, upon being elected, to unite the nation. He has decried division and disunity.
This today is his chosen moment for either honoring his promise to the American people by preaching on unity and healing...OR to do the opposite in hopes of reviving his standing in the polls by further dividing the country with an ugly address focused on denigrating the American people and pointlessly attacking the previous President who isn't even in elective office now.
LET'S SEE WHICH JOE BIDEN STEPS UP TO THE MICROPHONE.
Oh I can do better than the "fact checkers" and so can a lot of people who are not on the left. I demonstrated that Snopes was wrong about the origin of John McCain being called "songbird." It was the media itself, contrary to Snopes.I have never heard of this "Valletta fact checker". How do we know that it is not a bunch of right wing loons?
EDIT: I just now realized that your user name is Valletta. Sorry, you do not qualify as a fact checker. There is no " Valletta fact checker".
I doubt if you can. You should have bookmarked you claims about McCain and Snopes. If you cannot do that you have nothing. And I did not use Snopes as a fact checker. And even if by some odd miracle you were right about John McCain. That does not make you a better fact checker than Snopes. Snopes is probably right over 90% of the time. I doubt if you can get anywhere near 50%.Oh I can do better than the "fact checkers" and so can a lot of people who are not on the left. I demonstrated that Snopes was wrong about the origin of John McCain being called "songbird." It was the media itself, contrary to Snopes.
the GOP has tried for an investigation in only the states where the evidence is the strongest
Do your own researchWhat evidence? I have been asking for evidence of systematic fraud in the Presidential Election for a year. Nobody has provided any. One section of the American public still makes noises about fraud, but still after all this time have come up with nothing.
Georgia? Nothing to see there except lies about vans, ballot boxes left uncounted, irregularities at the count. But actual evidence fit to put before a judge? Even the lawyers put up to make a case for fraud admitted that there was none.
Since you ask me, the information is literally all over the internet. Any search engine should give you plenty.What evidence? I have been asking for evidence of systematic fraud in the Presidential Election for a year. Nobody has provided any.
Since you ask me, the information is literally all over the internet. Any search engine should give you plenty.
Nope. I cannot find any from reliable sources. And you seem to know that. But since you refuse to support your claim I will apply Hitchens' Razor:Since you ask me, the information is literally all over the internet. Any search engine should give you plenty.
Does reporting by an ABC affiliate in Little Rock, AR qualify as being covered in the national news of ABC? Can you provide an example of national news that has covered this story other than WSJ and FOX?No, we don't all know that. Not entirely sure what 'it' might be -- can you name an example of something reported by the WSJ that has been ignored by outlets further left in the green box? I can see that the story from the OP is covered by ABC.
Nope. I cannot find any from reliable sources. And you seem to know that. But since you refuse to support your claim I will apply Hitchens' Razor:
"THAT WHICH CAN BE ASSERTED WITHOUT EVIDENCE, CAN BE DISMISSED WITHOUT EVIDENCE."
I believe there is also a term for those liberal "fan-boys" who cannot get Trump out of their head. https://fox26newshenry.com/2022/01/...-ballot-trafficking-in-georgia-2020-election/Trying to get hard-core Trump fan-boys to provide any valid evidence of a stolen election is useless. They have bought into the Big Lie hook, line, and sinker. They only accept on-line and other media sources which confirm their beliefs. I'm not a psychiatrist, but this reminds me of an old psychoanalytic term: ego dystonic. It's the phenomenon where certain attitudes and beliefs have become so deeply ingrained in one's psyche, that any thoughts or ideas to the contrary are intolerable, and are immediately rejected. Thoughts like these are threats to the ego. Hence the term ego dystonic. (The term for the opposite-- thoughts and ideas that are consistent with the self-image--is ego syntonic.) Traditionally, the term applied to symptoms of psychiatric illness. Example: OCD patients sometimes have intrusive thoughts of things like driving a car into on-coming traffic. Or abducting, raping, and killing a co-worker. But they realize this thinking is abhorrent, shameful, and totally foreign to their values. These kinds of thoughts are ego dystonic. This concept wasn't meant to apply to politics. But it seems to me there's a sort of parallel when someone cannot accept the idea that Donald Trump lost a fair election. It would mean that his social and political values were rejected by a majority of the country. And that would be ego dystonic.
On the same evidentiary basis big foot exists, the world is flat, the moon landing was faked and the earth is hollow.Since you ask me, the information is literally all over the internet. Any search engine should give you plenty.
Does reporting by an ABC affiliate in Little Rock, AR qualify as being covered in the national news of ABC? Can you provide an example of national news that has covered this story other than WSJ and FOX?
I believe there is also a term for those liberal "fan-boys" who cannot get Trump out of their head. Corrupt Secretary of State Raffensperger to Investigate Himself After Allegations of Ballot Trafficking in Georgia 2020 Election
As they say, you coulda fooled us.I’d love to forget Donald Trump forever.
have you considered that the people who made that graphic might have some bias of their own. NYT has lost a good deal of credibility as has CNN
very true but I think that we all know that they will only report it if they absolutely are forced to because it does not fit the liberal agenda. What is funny is that you totally disregard the fact that the liberal media is liberal.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?