Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Not until 1611 was the "whole Bible" written thusly.Bear in mind that you're talking to some one who believes that the bible was originally written in Jacobean English - which was spoken universally from creation until the Tower of Babel episode.
There is no singular. Only a dual and a plural. שׁמה or שׁמיםwhat word Moses used for "heaven" (singular)
That was an attempt at saying "back atcha" in Hebrew.Back to me about what? And what does that have to do with the discussion?
I'm familiar with the rhetoric.There is no singular. Only a dual and a plural. שׁמה or שׁמים
shamayim or shameh. Note that shamayim is a construct of sha and mayim, not to be confused with the plural suffix "im."
Well you're wasting your time trying to impress me with it.Perhaps Hebrew is unknown to you, but not to me.
And what, pray tell, were the very words used by the autographers?TCassidy said:Any serious student of God's word will take the time to have, at least, a study knowledge of the very words God gave by inspiration.
"Problem"?TCassidy said:The problem with your KJVOism is "which KJV?" There are dozens of differences between the AV of 1611 and the most common KJV in print today, the 1769 Oxford edition.
You mean like believing Moses crossed the Sea of Reeds, and not the Red Sea?TCassidy said:Even KJVO author D.A. Waite admits there are around 150 "changes of substance" that change the meaning of the text.
The fifth.TCassidy said:So, which of the 7 or 8 different revisions of the KJV do you think is the correct one,
I'll paraphrase Gail Riplinger on this one:TCassidy said:... and why do you think that?
Don't know. Don't care. Don't care to know.TCassidy said:And why are the other KJVs wrong?
Well, you're entitled to your opinion.I believe the word God inspired, השׁמים.
As does this thread sum up your side too.You have summed up KJVOism quite well.
That's one too many.Asked and answered. See post #264.
Yes, I know. That the bible is the verbally and plenarily inspired, inerrant, infallible, preserved word of God.As does this thread sum up your side too.
So then there is a singular word for Heaven?גן עדן שלישי
גן עדן ראשון
גן עדן שני
Try ...Inspiration: the autographa.
Preservation: the apographa (and successive copies)
Derivation: as translated into the receptor language.
But you do.Nope. God does not make mistakes.
Unscriptural.
"Whereby the world (Greek-Kosmos) that then was, being overflowed with water, perished:" (Greek-destroyed totally)2 Peter 3:6
The world (Greek-Kosmos/Universe) perished being overflowed with water, not the air where the birds flew. The bird from the Ark was still capable of flying after the rain stopped to look for ground.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?