This all lends creedence to the theory or theories that I have been stating all along...
We got our precious, valuable metals, like silver and gold, from "stardust", or they were forged inside other stars (solar systems) elsewhere (long before ours) that went nova or supernova...
That the creation "days" are long ages, or "epochs", epochs being periods of time defined by events, or what was going on and/or happening at the time, and not necessarily "time itself" or they do not have to "equal periods of time", etc...
And the DNA evidence, that Adam and Eve, and the Garden of Eden was in or at a specific "region" in the earth, and the Garden of Eden itself and Adam and Eve were a "special creation" round about, or around 6,000 years ago, or so... "OR SO"...
But that when they were cast out of the Garden, that they and their DNA, starting with Cain and a, or his wife probably, began to mix or intermix with the inferior "others", or "other ones", that had "evolved", and the rest intermixed later on, or in time... Maybe starting shortly after the tower of babel when they were "scattered", (the descendants of Adam intermixing with those "others"), etc... (the Nephlim are mentioned right after the tower of babel and right before the flood "intermixing with the daughters of men", and I find that interesting) (anyway)... (anyway, only Noah and his sons were left after the flood as the only true descendants of Adam left in the earth after the flood, etc)
Anyway, This intermixing with those "others", would account for the gradual decrease in lifespans or longevity or years of life of them (The Sons of Adam), or the "deterioration" of them, by the time we get to Abraham, down from almost a thousand years to just 120 years, etc...
Also, getting back to stars and solar systems and the "entire universe", I think it has to be "much, much older" than only 13.8 billion years old, not all stars and solar systems and galaxies, etc, all each formed "all at or around the same exact time" like the current, both model and number of the "entire universe being only 13.8 billion years old suggests... They were (all) formed at much and many very different times and separately, and many have come and gone as well, and come and gone long before that since then, and the figure of only 13.8 billion years is not long enough to account for that...
Let alone entire galaxies, which were also formed at different times and not all at the same times, and many might have, and probably have and did, come and gone since then, or since the start of the formation of the entire universe, and only 13.8 billion years is not nearly enough time to account for "all of that", etc...
That figure, that number (and model) was established a long time ago, in the 50's I think, when we did not know, nor could see all of what we can see now... we could see just our own galaxy and maybe just a couple or very, very few other galaxies, and/but "now", now we can now see 46.5 billion light years in each and every direction, which we could not even come close to before, when that number was established, etc, and we now know that there are "trillions" of galaxies that we can see now, whereas we could only see a very few or just a couple before, when that number (13.8 billion years old, or "ago") was first established, and those galaxies are all at "different stages and ages", etc, and some have come and gone since then, they are not all at the same age and stage IOW's...
It has to be maybe hundreds of billions of years old, or possibly even trillions of years old, etc, and the "big bang theory", I'm not saying the theory itself is or could be entirely wrong, but the way we have "modeled it" or think of it most certainly is or has to be, etc... We have everything all forming at or around the "same time" and that just "has to be wrong now", etc, cause we can see that is has to be, just be observing what we can observe now, that it, or that, just "has to be wrong", etc...
I posted a few other things about here (below) as well...
can you find God?
God Bless!