We don't have to fear any curses,they are nailed to a tree.
Galatians 3:13
Christ redeemed us from the curse of the Law, having become a curse for us--for it is written, "CURSED IS EVERYONE WHO HANGS ON A TREE"--
M-kay . . . context is the "law" (nomos) which refers to
1. The Mosaic Law and the decrees thereof which Paul was battling against with the Judaizers who said that people needed to keep this law.
2. Whatever "curse" is here is connected with this concept of the Mosaic Law . . . not the effect of demons in spiritual warfare.
The curse of the law is found NOT in our relation to the demonic realm but to God Himself. The curse we must bear is the requirement to keep the WHOLE Law in order to be justified before Him . . . which we CANNOT, which is why it is a CURSE.
Hence the curse spoken of here is in relationship to God and has nothing to do with the believers battle with the entities of darkness.
I think that the problem is the word "curse." It has a biblical connotation which is entirely different than that of our current 21st Cent colloquial usage. Kataras means quite simply imprecation . . . negative declaration. The common usage of witches and spells and special "magical" chants really doesn't jive with the biblical term.
For me, the concept that the spiritual warfare camps try to promote should not be called "generational curses" but social sins. My grand daddy had an alcohol problem . . . now my dad does . . . and now I am prone to the same sinful tendencies because of social conditioning. Not to mention that if there IS that type of demonic influence around my grandfather, there is NO DOUBT that such an entity would seek to further its hold not only in the grandfather's life BUT ALSO IN THE LIFE OF THE NEXT GENERATION.
That spirit would have a easier target in that particular family (than say another family within which such a sin [in this case alcohol] does not have any effect) and would certainly use the social climate of that home which has been saturated with that atmosphere of sin to gain any knds of footholds that it may to infect any other members that it can.
So, while there is NO spiritual "right" that the spirit may have to enter into a person who has never had a drop of alcohol and make them an alcoholic, simply by sheer virtue that the "father" was an alcoholic, there certainly is the greater power of the spirit because of its pre-infective work with the older generations.
I think that this is where I would stand now, currently, with the current concepts of spiritual warfare.
The battling against these connections between generations, then, becomes a matter of SIN and repentance in sanctification and warring against breaking these ties and not some ethereal "magical" connection that gives demons rights over subsequent generations.
So this is probably where I would fall.
