Gays!!!

[drstevej]

As for you, DrSteveJ, I had thought better of you.

It's OK, follow the argument. I am talking rational.

 

[Spherical Time]

one's clone?

a buzzard?

One's clone! Awesome!

Doesn't stop Nambla. I mean why be so darn restrictive? Isn't that the argument?

Actually, it does stop NAMBLA, which is why they try to change the laws.

Of course, many gays are there to argue against them. As are Christians and just about every other rational group.

 

[sidhe]

Doesn't stop Nambla. I mean why be so darn restrictive? Isn't that the argument?

Nah, the argument is why restrict two consenting adults from entering into a contract together based on gender.

 

[truthshift]

Just as an aside, I have grown to absolutely detest the use of the phrase "lascivious licentiousness". If PC_F has said it once, he musta said it a thousand times.

wow, i was just making note of that when I read your post.

 

[morningstar2651]

But sex ought be consensual. NAMBLA wants to change the age of consent - their goal isn't marriage.

Personally, I'd rather see the age of consent rise rather than fall.

 

[Bombila]

It's OK, follow the argument. I am talking rational.

I call it the equivalent of saying certain minority groups drink the blood of sacrificed Christian babies. It's called hate speech in some places.

I hope you consider the impact of your words and the words of others like you the next time some gay person is beaten half to death by ignorant people who consider all gay men to be pedophiles.

 

[truthshift]

Doesn't stop Nambla. I mean why be so darn restrictive? Isn't that the argument?

No, it's not and you know it. A young child and a willful consenting adult, be they gay or not, are two entirely different things.

 

[selfinflikted]

To pervert is to distort or twist. Sexual perversion is a distortion and twisting of the divine design.

If there is no "divine design", then there is no perversion. Prove to me there is a "divine design" and I will aquiesce.

Okay then.

What if it's a blind dead insensate mute on life support?

What if it's a imaginary friend?

What if it's . . . a trekkie?

lulz

 

[CaDan]

The same-sex relationships exist, have existed, will continue to exist.

The only question is how the State will interact with them. No more and no less.

 

[OphidiaPhile]

See this is why I will not give an inch to "you guys." Even a misconstrued word or two and you think I'm joining the bathhouse club.



Whay should "what" be a minority classifier? OHhhhhh gay sex.



Last time I looked at a guy walking down the street that I knew to be into gay sex, looked just like a guy that wasn't into gay sex. It's flippin' creepy to give minority rights to the one guy that likes gay sex.

Are we going for preferred sex positions next?

Is S & M or B & D next?

Serioulsy, where's it end?

Sodom or Gomorrah? We forget about the perversions of Gomorrah huh? What were those folks into?



No, no, no, OH no. Before "you guys" claimed these tiltles "Gay" and "Lesbian" and "Bi-Sexual," you were just into lascivious licenitiousness. Also "Gays" were known by other names. And the one that starts with P is the one that concerns my side of the issue most.

Why aren't "Lesbians" called Sapphoians? "Lesbian" is just silly. All citizens of Lesbos are Lesbians, even the men.

Why aren't men that like homosexuality called Malians?

And in regards to "Bi-Sexuals" why are they part of your club at all? I have absoutely no cause to admire that moniker. A declaration of Anything Goes, IN any direction, with immutability, is something to be concerned about. I'm talking CDC concerned about.

And Transgendered? I have the greatest of compassion for anyone in that condition. I don't know why, I just do. It probably stems from them knowing what proper sexuality is all about. And certainly it is far easier to understand them than the other three.

Homosexuality =/= Pedophilia how many times does that need to be spelled out, in fact gay men are less likely to be pedophiles than straight men.

 

[OphidiaPhile]

There are thoudsand of people pushing it as a civil right. And thousands of us that oppose them.

This is tough for you?

I do not see how your use is remotely logical from the definitions I have posted.



Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1) - Cite This Source - Share This
las⋅civ⋅i⋅ous   [luh-siv-ee-uhs] Show IPA Pronunciation
–adjective
1. inclined to lustfulness; wanton; lewd: a lascivious, girl-chasing old man.
2. arousing sexual desire: lascivious photographs.
3. indicating sexual interest or expressive of lust or lewdness: a lascivious gesture.



icentious \Li*cen"tious\ (-sh[u^]s), a. [L. licentiosus: cf. F.
licencieux. See License.]
1. Characterized by license; passing due bounds; excessive;
abusive of freedom; wantonly offensive; as, a licentious
press.

A wit that no licentious pertness knows. --Savage.

2. Unrestrained by law or morality; lawless; immoral;
dissolute; lewd; lascivious; as, a licentious man; a
licentious life. ``Licentious wickedness.'' --Shak.

Syn: Unrestrained; uncurbed; uncontrolled; unruly; riotous;
ungovernable; wanton; profligate; dissolute; lax; loose;
sensual; impure; unchaste; lascivious; immoral. --
Li*cen"tious*ly, adv. -- Li*cen"tious*ness, n.

 

[OphidiaPhile]

What if the person of one's choosing is 4 years old or one's sibling or one's mom?

We are talking two consenting adults just as in every marriage, except of course the one that allow 14, 15 and 16 year olds to consent.
STATE
AGE
Alabama
16
Alaska
16
Arizona
18
Arkansas
16
California
18
Colorado
15
Connecticut
15
D.C.
16
Delaware
16
Florida
16/18 (bill pending)
Georgia
16
Hawaii
14
Idaho
14
Illinois
16/17
Indiana
16
Iowa
18
Kansas
16
Kentucky
16 - [1]
Louisiana
17
Maine
16
Maryland
16
Massachusetts
16/18
Michigan
16
Minnesota
16
Mississippi
16 - [2]
Missouri
17
Montana
16
Nebraska
16
Nevada
16
New Hampshire
16/18
New Jersey
16/18
New Mexico
17
New York
17
North Carolina
16
North Dakota
18
Ohio
16
Oklahoma
16
Oregon
18
Pennsylvania
16
Rhode Island
16
South Carolina
14/16
South Dakota
16
Tennessee
18
Texas
17
Utah
16/18
Vermont
16
Virginia
15
Washington
16
West Virginia
16
Wisconsin
18
Wyoming
16
Puerto Rico
18

 

[OphidiaPhile]

Okay then.

What if it's a blind dead insensate mute on life support?

What if it's a imaginary friend?

What if it's . . . a trekkie?

Are you a Trekkist?

 

[Spherical Time]

Are you a Trekkist?

To my secret shame I am both a Trekkie and a Trekkist.

 

[Wyzaard]

Doesn't stop Nambla. I mean why be so darn restrictive? Isn't that the argument?

Nope! (thnx for playing)

 

[CaDan]

To my secret shame I am both a Trekkie and a Trekkist.

Ah! Bi-Trek-ual.

Like a tribble.

 

[Wiccan_Child]

Ah! Bi-Trek-ual.

Like a tribble.

Actually, they're asexual: they're born pregnant .

 

[OphidiaPhile]

To my secret shame I am both a Trekkie and a Trekkist.

As am I and it is nice to be able to admit it.

 

[truthshift]

So, back to my OP.

Why such a focus on gays when the world is fraught with many many many more social issues?

I guess that my question was answered when PCF started posting though. It's obvious that there are some extreme bigots with twisted views on reality dwelling under the guise of religion. I can see how one such as him can incite a hateful intent in those around him who would not readily stand against him. After all, he speaks to what many christians (at least partially) feel about homosexuality. His reasoning though.. it's insane. >_<

 

[corvus_corax]

But sex ought be consensual. NAMBLA wants to change the age of consent - their goal isn't marriage.

Quite correct

Personally, I'd rather see the age of consent rise rather than fall.

So then, you would have opposed the marriage between Joseph and Mary?
How DARE YOU, you liberal!!!!