• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Full Preterism-Where is the scriptural evidence?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Maybe no individual ECF held that ALL Eschatology was fulfilled in 70AD However, when we accumulate all the individual prophesies that any given ECF on their own DID believe to be fulfilled in 70AD, and put them together, we basically arrive at a Full preterist position, not to mention the fact that many of the prophesies certain ECF's held as fulfilled in 70, logically necessitate a FP conclusion, even if they were personally inconsistent on their application thereof.

Of course A New World and Evergreen48 are correct in saying ECF's were not inspired and quite often had far out opinions that no honest modern Bible expositor would hold today.

But somehow that fact doesn't bother the anti preterists who Champion ECF writings as DEFINITIVE proof against preterism.

Logical fallacy, poisoning the well. The fact that one ECF was wrong about "X" does not prove that he was wrong about "Y,""Z" or any other point. The comment about inspiration is irrelevant. I don't quote historical evidence claiming that it was inspired but to show what the church believed at some point. The ECF are cited in lexicons as sources for the meaning of the koine Greek in the NT.

The Epistle Of Ignatius To The Magnesians [ca. 98 AD]
Ignatius was a disciple of John the apostle. John certainly would have taught him, if Jesus had returned 28 years earlier.

These things[I address to you], my beloved, not that I know any of you to be in such a state;[17] but, as less than any of you, I desire to guard you beforehand, that ye fall not upon the hooks of vain doctrine, but that you may rather attain to a full assurance in Christ, who was begotten by the Father before all ages, but was afterwards ye attain to full assurance in regard to the birth, and passion, and resurrection which took place in the time of the government of Pontius Pilate, being truly and certainly accomplished by Jesus Christ, who is our hope,[1] from which may no one of you ever be turned aside. Born of the Virgin Mary without any intercourse with man. He also lived a holy life, and healed every kind of sickness and disease among the people, and wrought signs and wonders for the benefit of men; and to those who had fallen into the error of polytheism He made known the one and only true God, His Father, and underwent the passion, and endured the cross at the hands of the Christ-killing Jews, under Pontius Pilate the governor and Herod the king. He also died, and rose again, and ascended into the heavens to Him that sent Him, and is sat down at His right hand, and shall come at the end of the world, with His Father's glory, to judge the living and the dead, and to render to every one according to his works.[2] He who knows these things with a full assurance, and believes them, is happy; even as ye are now the lovers of God and of Christ, in the full assurance of our hope, from which may no one of us[3] ever be turned aside!

Chap. X.--Beware Of Judaizing.

Let us not, therefore, be insensible to His kindness. For were He to reward us according to our works, we should cease to be. Therefore, having become His disciples, let us learn to live according to the principles of Christianity.[7] For whosoever is called by any other name besides this, is not of God. Lay aside, therefore, the evil, the old, the sour leaven, and be ye changed into the new leaven, which is Jesus Christ. Be ye salted in Him, lest any one among you should be corrupted, since by your savour ye shall be convicted. It is absurd to profess[12] Christ Jesus, and to Judaize. For Christianity did not embrace[13] Judaism, but Judaism Christianity, that so every tongue which believeth might be gathered together to God.

The Epistle Of Ignatius To The Philadelphians
Chap. VI.--Do Not Accept Judaism.

But if any one preach the Jewish law(9) unto you, listen not to him. For it is better to hearken to Christian doctrine from a man who has been circumcised, than to Judaism from one uncircumcised.
But if either of such persons do not speak concerning Jesus Christ, they are in my judgment but as monuments and sepulchres of the dead, upon which are written only the names of men. Flee therefore the wicked devices and snares of the prince prophets, but denies Christ to be the Son of God, he is a liar, even as also is his father the devil,(10) and is a Jew falsely so called, being possessed of(11) mere carnal circumcision.​

The late date, for the writing of Revelation, by John, ca. 96 AD, has been argued against because it mentions Judaizers, which according to Peter. sources, “would be ridiculous after the temple was destroyed..” Yet, here Ignatius warns against Judaizers, in two of his letters, 98 AD and later

If the “Day of the Lord” and Jesus’ return occurred in 70 AD then Justin Martyr writing about 150 AD knew nothing about it. Justin specifically states that God “has still delayed” Jesus' return, following His ascension.

The First Apology Of Justin [110-165 AD]

For in the Jewish war which lately raged, Barchochebas, the leader of the revolt of the Jews, gave orders that Christians alone should be led to cruel punishments, unless they would deny Jesus Christ and utter blasphemy. In these books, then, of the prophets we found Jesus our Christ foretold as coming, born of a virgin, growing up to man's estate, and healing every disease and every sickness, and raising the dead, and being hated, and unrecognised, and crucified, and dying, and rising again, and ascending into heaven, and being called, the Son of God. We find it also predicted that certain persons should be sent by Him into every nation to publish these things, and that rather among the Gentiles [than among the Jews] men should believe on Him. And He was predicted before He appeared, first 5000 years before, and again 3000, then 2000, then 1000, and yet again 800; for in the succession of generations prophets after prophets arose.

Chap. XLV.--Christ's Session In Heaven Foretold.

And that God the Father of all would bring Christ to heaven after He had raised Him from the dead, and would keep Him there(2) until He has subdued His enemies the devils, and until the number of those who are foreknown by Him as good and virtuous is complete, on whose account He has still delayed the consummation--hear what was said by the prophet David. These are his words: "The Lord said unto My Lord, Sit Thou at My right hand, until I make Thine enemies Thy footstool. The Lord shall send to Thee the rod of power out of Jerusalem; and rule Thou in the midst of Thine enemies. With Thee is the government in the day of Thy power, in the beauties of Thy saints: from the womb of morning(3) hare I begotten Thee."(4) That which he says, "He shall send to Thee the rod of power out of Jerusalem," is predictive of the mighty, word, which His apostles, going forth from Jerusalem, preached everywhere; and though death is decreed against those who teach or at all confess the name of Christ, we everywhere both embrace and teach it. And if you also read these words in a hostile spirit, ye can do no more, as I said before, than kill us; which indeed does no harm to us, but to you and all who unjustly hate us, and do not repent, brings eternal punishment by tire.​

One last church father, for a third witness. Irenaeus writing about 150 AD, also writes of the crucifixion, resurrection and ascension and also mentions only a future manifestation from heaven. Note, none of these early church fathers mention the “Day of the Lord”, the return of Jesus with all of his angels, which supposedly occurred in 70 AD.[/b]

Irenaeus Against Heresies [120-202 AD]

1. The Church, though dispersed through our the whole world, even to the ends of the earth, has received from the apostles and their disciples this faith: [She believes] in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven, and earth, and the sea, and all things that are in them; and in one Christ Jesus, the Son of God, who became incarnate for our salvation; and in the Holy Spirit, who proclaimed through the prophets the dispensations(6) of God, and the advents, and the birth from a virgin, and the passion, and the resurrection from the dead, and the ascension into heaven in the flesh of the beloved Christ Jesus, our Lord, and His [future] manifestation from heaven in the glory of the Father "to gather all things in one,"(7) and to raise up anew all flesh of the whole human race, in order that to Christ Jesus, our Lord, and God, and Saviour, and King, according to the will of the invisible Father, "every knee should bow, of things in heaven,, and things in earth, and things under the earth, and that every tongue should confess"(8) to Him, and that He should execute just judgment towards all; that He may send "spiritual wickednesses,"​

Should you feel inclined to check my sources here is the link to the early church fathers at CCEL, online.

Early Church Fathers - Christian Classics Ethereal Library
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
One should never rely on "church fathers" as their standard of truth.
How do we know which of the "church fathers" were reliable?
How do we even know if their opinions have been accurately maintained and preserved?

On the other hand, as Christians, we believe the Bible is inspired and inerrant in its original form.
We believe God has preserved His Word, and it alone is reliable and therefore our only standard of truth.

The Bible is inspired but the interpretation of 18th century sects is not! The problem here is someone saying, "My interpretation of scripture is correct and any historical evidence which proves me wrong is not accurate, unreliable, etc. " The task before you if you choose to pursue this line of faulty reasoning you must prove, not just assert that the ECF were not reliable, and were not accurately maintained and preserved.
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
There is certainly nothing of value in what some other man, especially a dead one, could possibly offer.

(Rom 3:4) God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged.

There is certainly nothing of value in the opinions about scripture by men who could not conjugate a Greek verb or locate a Hebrew verb if their life depended on it.

ἄφετε αὐτούς· τυφλοί εἰσιν ὁδηγοί τυφλῶν· τυφλὸς δὲ τυφλὸν ἐὰν ὁδηγῇ, ἀμφότεροι εἰς βόθυνον πεσοῦνται.

החרשׁים שׁמעו והעורים הביטו לראות׃
 
Upvote 0

JesusMartyr

Active Member
May 2, 2014
79
11
✟239.00
Faith
Marital Status
Single
I'm surprised that you've heard the idea that the disciples never died but were translated bodily into paradise to await the 'second coming' when they will come back to earth, finally die, and then be resurrected in their new physical/spiritual bodies.

As I said, I grew up in a Dispensationalist home but never heard anything like that.

God bless you. I enjoy reading your posts since they seem unaffected by the modern spin so common today.

And Jesus Bless you too friend. It is nice to meet those of the Spirit, who've had eyes opened to see, independent of any theology or man's influence in interpretations. That is how we know brethren in Christ, the True Israel of God.

yea, also after having John 21;21,22 also thrown at me as collaboration of that certain line of thought, I was impressed with their argument, and also myself wondered if John and all the first century church was still walking around in the flesh on this planet... what confusion!
But it is right there, "this generation" referring to them THEN was going to see the destruction of Jerusalem, and they did. Just exactly as Jesus said he would in the Olivet prophecy. They would seem to have HAD to be still in the flesh if the word of God is true... but of course that all came to light when I threw man's handbooks away and didn't make the uncalled for assumption that it was "future"... where did that idea come from anyway? Well that is an interesting topic for another time.
The futurists don't comprehend Matt 24 because...
Intermixed in the Olivet prophecy is the duties of the saints/messengers/angels aka church members, in the spreading of the gospel into the world and gathering together the elect into the Body of Christ.
That began 2000 years ago (start at Acts chapters 1 and 2 and 3 and so on...)That happened, has continued to happen, and is still happening, and will continue to happen unstoppably, until the "end". When there is no more men of faith on the earth. It is then the END. The gospel business will then be over. God will then be all in all. But we are getting ahead of ourselves, as wonderful as that will be, out of this flesh finally...
It is the "foolishness of preaching the gospel" by which EVERYTHING is carried out to it's final consummation. That is the other part of the Olivet Prophecy. THIS JOB IS CARRIED OUT BY THE CHURCH A.K.A. MESSENGERS (angels). And this preaching is by the "angels" a.k.a. messengers of the covenant of Abraham fulfilled to ISRAEL, the Marriage supper is NOW ready and we are preaching ourselves hoarse to come eat, NOW, while it is called TO DAY, and to QUIT PUTTING OFF THE MARRIAGE of one's self to Christ!
Folk have been poisoned and blinded by man's theology, the so called "church fathers" whom the false prophets feed off, then repeat the errors so authoritively and matter-of-factly... watch out for those folks!
So yeah, the futurist views, future battle, future worldly temple, future animal sacrifices again, rapture, tribulation, 1000 years literal on planet monarchy etc etc via the scofield/hal Lindsay propaganda ideas, the "Taken" movie oh my dear Lord the crazie ideas of the futurists bury the poor unsuspecting acolyte under a mountain of impossibilities... and yet we all at one time or another fell for it, or some of it.
The fact is, no futurist can be honest when they ignore the "this generation" specific point Jesus was stressing concerning the TIMING as well as other obvious elements warned to the Jerusalem Church to be aware of the day it was to be fulfilled.
It's the entire reason that the year before it happened, James received from John the final Revelation of Jesus Christ delivered from the Isle of Patmos, the final preparation, written in the way that only the Saints would comprehend... (A fact not popular amongst the futurists, who hold to a very weak argument on that timing, again I digress...)
For many years I stood agape, unlearning, relearning, seeing the Lord unfold before me Truly, never knowing what I had been missing, never imagining the beholding the Glory of the New Covenant in the Most Holy Place in My Temple Body. Just as promised in the Old Testament to Israel. One and the same. Israel is the Church. Not some anti-Christ warmongering world banking frauds who stolen the name and claimed the old geographic location... a blasphemy before YHVH that shall truly not go without a great final recompense, again I digress...)
So it's not like I'm without compassion, I know where they come from. But I don't understand how they stand so fast with their ideas when all the scriptures and reality is right there! I never argued with it once I saw it(?)!!! IT IS RIGHT THERE! How can someone argue against the Word of God, THAT is what I don't get.
When I first began to see the Word of God is for me and all of us who read it, regardless of the era we were born, every bit is as applicable to whoever read it whenever, because it is TIMELESS if we know what we are reading! It applies to everyone, and those of the true faith will understand it and Love it!
As far as a future element a.k.a. "prophesy" in the Gospel other than the Olivet Prophecy, is... when death itself is conquered.
Death is the last enemy. OUR last enemy. Each and every one of us. All other forces have been put down by Christ in His death and resurrection and Ascension as our Father Now. We who are "born from above" KNOW it :)
We rejoice in being that Holy City New Jerusalem, the Wife of Christ, bearing His Children of Faith. We bear His Children, the Saints, via preaching the pure Word of God. Jesus Himself does the rest. For upon whom some of those whom we "angels" went forth to gather, they looked up in Faith to our Lord Jesus Himself and ASK HIM TO COME INTO THEM, who will Come into them and others also and dwell together with them also as us, and them and Him, as One Pure I AM into Eternity, words that can't be expressed, are who we are in Him as One Now.
As a Husband one with His Wife, who brings forth the only begotten son of God in their Lives, while it is called Now, To Day.
It isn't something to put off, children. Now is the time.
Thank you for your kind messages and it is so wonderful to meet Saints here, in this "outlaw" forum haha!
Blessings to you.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Nova2216
Upvote 0

JesusMartyr

Active Member
May 2, 2014
79
11
✟239.00
Faith
Marital Status
Single
There is certainly nothing of value in the opinions about scripture by men who could not conjugate a Greek verb or locate a Hebrew verb if their life depended on it.

ἄφετε αὐτούς· τυφλοί εἰσιν ὁδηγοί τυφλῶν· τυφλὸς δὲ τυφλὸν ἐὰν ὁδηγῇ, ἀμφότεροι εἰς βόθυνον πεσοῦνται.

החרשׁים שׁמעו והעורים הביטו לראות׃

My name is Brenda and I don't appreciate your personal attacks on me. And I have a bit more understanding about things than you might think young man. But I believe your assumption and personal accusation that I don't know what I'm talking about because you might be better at conjugating Greek verbs, is quite telling of a lot of other things I've seen about you so far. Your claim is quite doubtful from what I've seen, and you don't hold a candle to Little lamb... who is dead on in what I've seen him post. And you've been quite rude to me more than once on this place.
Please accept this rebuke in the love of Jesus. I forgive you.
I know that to some, a new concept of a "religious" nature becomes an enemy of sorts, and then an attack occurs. Please, can we dispense with this? Do I have to continue reporting your posts?
What would Jesus do?
Brenda
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jack Terrence
Upvote 0

JesusMartyr

Active Member
May 2, 2014
79
11
✟239.00
Faith
Marital Status
Single
There is certainly nothing of value in the opinions about scripture by men who could not conjugate a Greek verb or locate a Hebrew verb if their life depended on it.

ἄφετε αὐτούς· τυφλοί εἰσιν ὁδηγοί τυφλῶν· τυφλὸς δὲ τυφλὸν ἐὰν ὁδηγῇ, ἀμφότεροι εἰς βόθυνον πεσοῦνται.

החרשׁים שׁמעו והעורים הביטו לראות׃

I'm glad I don't have any reason to give my own opinions, as some do. Only the pure Word of God is acceptable for me to give.
 
Upvote 0

Evergreen48

Senior Member
Aug 24, 2006
2,300
150
✟25,319.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The Bible is inspired but the interpretation of 18th century sects is not! The problem here is someone saying, "My interpretation of scripture is correct and any historical evidence which proves me wrong is not accurate, unreliable, etc. " The task before you if you choose to pursue this line of faulty reasoning you must prove, not just assert that the ECF were not reliable, and were not accurately maintained and preserved.

And it is equally incumbent upon you to PROVE that the ECF were reliable men who had not strayed from the true teachings of our Lord. Were they not precursors to the RCC, after all?
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
My name is Brenda and I don't appreciate your personal attacks on me. And I have a bit more understanding about things than you might think young man. But I believe your assumption and personal accusation that I don't know what I'm talking about because you might be better at conjugating Greek verbs, is quite telling of a lot of other things I've seen about you so far. Your claim is quite doubtful from what I've seen, and you don't hold a candle to Little lamb... who is dead on in what I've seen him post. And you've been quite rude to me more than once on this place.
Please accept this rebuke in the love of Jesus. I forgive you.
I know that to some, a new concept of a "religious" nature becomes an enemy of sorts, and then an attack occurs. Please, can we dispense with this? Do I have to continue reporting your posts?
What would Jesus do?
Brenda

If feel you have to report my posts please do so. My posts are no more a personal attack on you than yours are on me. Do you consider someone disagreeing with you to be attacking you? Since you apparently are not knowledgable in Biblical Greek, how can you know my knowledge is doubtful and that LLOJ is dead on? What is your yardstick whatever appears to support your assumptions/presuppositions? Young man? I joined the army about the year you were born. My oldest son is about your age. I don't consider myself an expert but I started learning to speak Greek in Germany the year that Elvis and I were stationed there and studied Greek and Hebrew formally about 2 decades later.

I have not seen a "new concept of a religious nature." I have seen the same arguments over and over and over and I have been refuting them here on this forum for more than a decade.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
And it is equally incumbent upon you to PROVE that the ECF were reliable men who had not strayed from the true teachings of our Lord. Were they not precursors to the RCC, after all?

Wrong! The ECF have been around for 1700-2000 years and have been thoroughly studied and documented by 100s of scholars since that time. Anyone who challenges them, it is incumbent on that person to prove that the ECF have strayed from the true teachings of our Lord. Your last comment is a logical fallacy, poisoning the well. "The RCC is bad, the ECF preceded the RCC so they must be bad too." Let me know when you have proved any of the ECF wrong.
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0

parousia70

Livin' in yesterday's tomorrow
Site Supporter
Feb 24, 2002
15,559
4,834
59
Oregon
✟901,523.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Oh we're going to play "Neener, neener, neener I'm right and you're wrong! Am too! Nuh Huh!"

Just complying with your prior request to "Let me know when you have proved any of the ECF wrong"..

If you didn't actually want anyone to "let you know", maybe you shouldn't have asked.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Evergreen48
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Just complying with your prior request to "Let me know when you have proved any of the ECF wrong"..

If you didn't actually want anyone to "let you know", maybe you shouldn't have asked.

Making some vague comment about a Phoenix is not proving them wrong! Even if you prove something about a Phoenix, you will not have proved any points of their Christian Theology wrong. Care to try again?
 
Upvote 0

A New World

Member
May 21, 2014
455
82
CA
✟23,451.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The Bible is inspired but the interpretation of 18th century sects is not!

Amen! I have no reason to rely on 18th century interpreters, that seems to be your method of pursuing truth.

The problem here is someone saying, "My interpretation of scripture is correct and any historical evidence which proves me wrong is not accurate, unreliable, etc. " The task before you if you choose to pursue this line of faulty reasoning you must prove, not just assert that the ECF were not reliable, and were not accurately maintained and preserved.

No, I don't have to prove the ECF were not reliable. I have a personal responsibility to study God's Word in order to know the truth. How other individuals or groups decided to interpret Scripture is not relevant to truth.

You don't seem to comprehend the fact that so-called "historical evidence" can't prove anyone's view of Scripture right or wrong. It's not the standard, Scripture is! All the so-called "historical evidence" can do is show that well meaning individuals and groups had some things right and some wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JesusMartyr
Upvote 0

A New World

Member
May 21, 2014
455
82
CA
✟23,451.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
There is certainly nothing of value in the opinions about scripture by men who could not conjugate a Greek verb or locate a Hebrew verb if their life depended on it.

ἄφετε αὐτούς· τυφλοί εἰσιν ὁδηγοί τυφλῶν· τυφλὸς δὲ τυφλὸν ἐὰν ὁδηγῇ, ἀμφότεροι εἰς βόθυνον πεσοῦνται.

החרשׁים שׁמעו והעורים הביטו לראות׃

Those who persecuted Christians, killed the apostles, prophets, saints and The Lord himself were fluent in both Hebrew and Greek. I think they could certainly "conjugate a Greek verb or locate a Hebrew verb if their life depended on it." However, since their lives depended on placing their faith in Messiah, not their abilities to properly conjugate verbs, they died in their sins.

Your point is meaningless!
 
Upvote 0

Evergreen48

Senior Member
Aug 24, 2006
2,300
150
✟25,319.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Der Alter said:
Wrong! The ECF have been around for 1700-2000 years and have been thoroughly studied and documented by 100s of scholars since that time.

Because YOU say it is wrong does not make it so. And Just because "100s of scholars" have studied the ECF does not prove anything about their reliability or spirituality, or that all that is written of them is true. For instance, lets look at the story that is told of the martyrdom of Polycarp who was a ECF:

"The fire, "like the sail of a vessel filled by the wind, made a wall round the body" of the martyr, leaving it unscathed. The executioner was ordered to stab him, thereupon, "there came forth a quantity of blood so that it extinguished the fire". CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: St. Polycarp

I believe that story is plainly and simply a lie.

I have read some of the writings of the ECF, and personally I don't see anything so wonderful or spiritually enlightening or illuminating in anything I have read thus far.

Anyone who challenges them, it is incumbent on that person to prove that the ECF have strayed from the true teachings of our Lord.

I believe stories like the one which was posted which compares the the resurrection of our Lord, or the resurrection of anyone else, to the "rebirth" of a legendary creature like the phoenix certainly would be at least one example of that ECF straying from the teachings of our Lord.

Your last comment is a logical fallacy, poisoning the well. "The RCC is bad, the ECF preceded the RCC so they must be bad too." Let me know when you have proved any of the ECF wrong.

Let me be clear here. I have dear friends who are of the RCC faith. I love them dearly. They are some of the most loving and charitable people I have ever known. But I do not agree with their doctrines and practices, nor do they of mine. But still we are friends, and we love one another. That, I think, is the most important thing! So, I did not say the RCC is bad, and you have falsely accused me. I say it has, for the most part, strayed from the teachings of our Lord, and has inserted much into its constitution that is not the teachings of our Lord. And in its past it has actually persecuted the Lord's church which has always been here since it's institution by Jesus Christ himself. That church does not go by any denominational name such as Baptist, Pentecostal, Methodist, Presbyterian, RCC, etc., though probably most of those who attend these organized institutions are most likely members also of his church "at large" also.

I have already proved at least one ECF to be wrong, or did you forget about the legendary bird called the phoenix, that ECF 1Clement of Rome wrote about?
 
Upvote 0

JesusMartyr

Active Member
May 2, 2014
79
11
✟239.00
Faith
Marital Status
Single
If feel you have to report my posts please do so. My posts are no more a personal attack on you than yours are on me. Do you consider someone disagreeing with you to be attacking you? Since you apparently are not knowledgable in Biblical Greek, how can you know my knowledge is doubtful and that LLOJ is dead on? What is your yardstick whatever appears to support your assumptions/presuppositions? Young man? I joined the army about the year you were born. My oldest son is about your age. I don't consider myself an expert but I started learning to speak Greek in Germany the year that Elvis and I were stationed there and studied Greek and Hebrew formally about 2 decades later.

I have not seen a "new concept of a religious nature." I have seen the same arguments over and over and over and I have been refuting them here on this forum for more than a decade.

Yes, I have reported your post young man. Very young and immature. I'm not interested in a self puffed up wanna be Greek blow hard who thinks he has knowledge, but who demonstrates the opposite, plus terrible manners, and lack of wisdom and argues against scriptures and contradicts your superiors over and over again. Ignoring the protests of bully tactics you use, ignoring the requests to LEAVE US ALONE... What use are you but to come crashing along against the Saints of God, while lifting yourself up by your own bootstraps from your deep void? The great enemy against the Gospel can do nothing but. Who can only throw around big claims of history as though that means anything... As though the CO were "something" but are just other men, who haven't any more comprehension of truth than you do, making yourself twofold a child of hell than they are in their false doctrines just because you venerate them and their false ideas... I have the exact same Greek tools as you do and probably more, and several decades of in depth research in the LXX as well, and prayer and understanding. To claim you think you have something over others, when you have demonstrated your embarrassing deficiencies is a symptom of massive pride, a disease of the soul. And YES, YOU personally attack without provocation sonny. You have shown yourself an enemy to the Gospel, and compound your sin in making yourself the enemy of the Saints. You shall be ignored as a screaming kid over in the corner. You are dismissed from my presence forever.
 
Upvote 0

JesusMartyr

Active Member
May 2, 2014
79
11
✟239.00
Faith
Marital Status
Single
And it is equally incumbent upon you to PROVE that the ECF were reliable men who had not strayed from the true teachings of our Lord. Were they not precursors to the RCC, after all?

Isn't it incredible, the spirit from the void pushing others to accept the errant "church father's" interpretations, instead of seeking the Lord for knowledge wisdom and understanding?
How can people let them selves become so deceived and so full of themselves?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Evergreen48
Upvote 0

JesusMartyr

Active Member
May 2, 2014
79
11
✟239.00
Faith
Marital Status
Single
Wrong! The ECF have been around for 1700-2000 years and have been thoroughly studied and documented by 100s of scholars since that time. Anyone who challenges them, it is incumbent on that person to prove that the ECF have strayed from the true teachings of our Lord. Your last comment is a logical fallacy, poisoning the well. "The RCC is bad, the ECF preceded the RCC so they must be bad too." Let me know when you have proved any of the ECF wrong.

And finally, for this mindless opinion of what makes things glaringly obvious of who we are dealing with here, I rest my case. Yes, of course, the RCC and the ECF have no clue, REVEALED over and over by scriptures. It's obvious to the Saints who actually know scriptures. Such spewers are simply the spawn of dark age heretical departures from scriptures, into the wild spiritless theology put together by such ilk as from Constantine's workings amongst the pagan Romans combing pagan doctrines with Christian religion. An obvious mess is all that is left behind from that. Now we get to listen to it, how fun...
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.