Yet another quote from a different era of science.
Max Planck lived in a different era?
In actual fact however, Max Planck lived in the 20th century.
Do you know what era means?
Nobody has ever found a single piece of evidence that doesn't support evolution.
Good one.
According to you evolution is a religion, therefore no possible evidence can contradict it.
Are you really denying atomic theory ... ?
Why would I deny Mosiachal theory?
" ... if one must believe Poseidonius,
the ancient dogma about atoms originated with Mochus, a Sidonian, born before the Trojan times. However, let us dismiss things ancient." -- Strabo, geographer,
The Geography, Book XVI, 7
"And the like Opinion has been by some of the Antients ascrib'd to the
Phoenicians, from whom
Thales himself is conceiv'd to have borrow'd it; as probably the Greeks did much of their Theologie, and, as I am apt to think, of their Philosophy too; since
the Devising of the Atomical Hypothesis commonly ascrib'd to Lucippus and his Disciple Democritus is by Learned Men attributed to one Moschus a Phoenician. And possibly the Opinion is yet antienter than so; For 'tis known that the Phoenicians borrow'd most of their Learning from the Hebrews." -- Robert Boyle, chemist,
The Sceptical Chymist, 1661
"Wherefore we have made it evident, that that very mechanical or atomical philosophy, that hath been lately restored by Cartesius and Gassendus, as to the main substance of it, was not only elder than Epicurus, but also than Plato and Aristotle, nay, than Democritus and Leucippus also, the commonly reputed fathers of it. And therefore we have no reason to discredit the report of Posidonius the Stoic, who, as Strabo tells us, affirmed this atomical philosophy to have been ancienter than the times of the Trojan war, and first to have been brought into Greece out of Phoenicia. ... And since it is certain from what we have shown, that neither Epicurus nor yet Democritus were the first inventors of this physiology, this testimony of Posidonius the Stoic ought in reason to be admitted by us. Now, what can be more probable than that this Moschus the Phoenician, that Posidonius speaks of, is the very same person with that Moschus the physiologer, that Jamblichus mentions in the Life of Pythagoras, where he affirms, that Pythagoras, living some time at Sidon in Phoenicia, conversed with the prophets that were the successors of Mochus the physiologer, and was instructed by them: ... 'He conversed with the prophets that were the successors of Mochus and other Phoenician priests.'
And what can be more certain than that both Mochus and Moschus, the Phoenician and philosopher, was no other than Moses, the Jewish lawgiver, as Arverius [Johannes Arcerius] rightly guesses: ... 'It seems that it ought to be read Moschus, unless any had rather read it Mochus or Moses.' Wherefore according to the ancient tradition, Moschus or Moses the Phoenician being the first author of the atomical philosophy, it ought to be called neither Epicurean nor Democritical, but Moschical or Mosiacal." -- Ralph Cudworth, philosopher,
The True Intellectual System of the Universe, Volume III, 1671
"That all matter consists of atoms was a very ancient opinion. This was the teaching of the multitude of philosophers who preceded Aristotle, namely Epicurus, Democritus, Ecphantus, Empedocles, Zenocrates, Heraclides, Asclepiades, Diodorus, Metrodorus of Chios, Pythagoras, and previous to these Moschus the Phoenician whom Strabo declares older than the Trojan war. For I think that same opinion obtained in that mystic philosophy which flowed down to the Greeks from Egypt and Phoenicia, since atoms are sometimes found designated by the mystics as monads." -- Isaac Newton, alchemist/mathematician,
Portsmouth Manuscript, 1687
This statement is absolutely false, and I challenge you to find a single respectable source that claims this. (That means no biased 'creation research institute' sources)
I challenge you to name one single-celled organism that has ever magically, miraculously, and spontaneously evolved into a two-celled organism. And I challenge you to name one morphological change in archaea or cyanobacteria in the last 3 billion years.
This is an outright falsehood. Which church did he belong to? Can I call them up and ask them if he was a member of their congregation? There is not a shred of evidence that he would ever attend a church, and as you seem to have completely ignored all of my quotes showing how Sagan really felt about religion. Willfully ignorant describes you to a T.
LOL. Wow. Do you hate Carl Sagan because he attended Christian Church in Ithaca New York?
