- Sep 24, 2005
- 12,364
- 456
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
Matthew 5:17-19
Perhaps it would be a good idea to quote that passage rather than citing it. Then you can demonstrate your contention that Jesus didn't fulfill the law concerning Himself. This doesn't support your claim that Jesus said the "moral" law was eternal.
I'll save him the trouble of looking it up:
17 "Do not think that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish but to fulfill.
18 "For truly I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or stroke shall pass from the Law until all is accomplished.
19 "Whoever then annuls one of the least of these commandments, and teaches others to do the same, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever keeps and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
18 "For truly I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or stroke shall pass from the Law until all is accomplished.
19 "Whoever then annuls one of the least of these commandments, and teaches others to do the same, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever keeps and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
Jesus didn't say, "The moral law is eternal." He referred to the whole law and the prophets. As has been pointed out many times before, in the sermon on the mount (the context of the above verses), Jesus addressed several other commandments of the law besides the ten. Aren't you teaching that some of the jots and tittles have passed away, Rasell? If the law is still binding, the whole thing has to be still binding, not the "moral" components separated from the "ceremonial" components.
Upvote
0