pat34lee
Messianic
- Sep 13, 2011
- 11,293
- 2,636
- 61
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Messianic
- Marital Status
- Single
OK, so much for biochemistry. You can do the same thing with the fossil record ("no rabbits will be found in cabrian strata"), etc, again giving thousands of easily falsifiable predictions for all of the millions of places where excavations are happening. The same for Genetics. The same for physiology. The same for pathology. and so on. The point is that UCA makes literally hundreds of millions of eminently testable predictions, thousands of which are tested every year.
Um, no. There are millions of scientists in fields affected by UCA/evolution. In science, the best ticket to fame, fortune and TENURE is to find evidence against an established theory. In fact, the more well established or more famous the theory, the more valuable it is to find evidence against it. The rules are that you can't fabricate evidence, and your evidence has to be publically verifiable. Seems simply, but those make it hard.
That's why Einstein was so prominent - because he found exceptions to Newton's theories. What about Newton? he was so prominent because he found evidence against Aristotle's ideas. And so on, for practically any famous scientist (Curie, Faraday, Darwin, Millikan, you name it).
Exceptions and so-called "Cambrian rabbits" are found all the time. They are
either ignored, labeled as fakes or 'lost'. The woman who found soft tissue in
dinosaur fossils was almost drummed out because her find was so far outside
the realm of possibilities. They couldn't even be bothered to make a realistic
sounding theory as to how it occurred. Nothing will make soft tissue last for
millions of years. Not iron, and not fairy dust.
Actually, the fastest way to lose your funding is to rock the boat. Even if a
scientist were independently wealthy and self-funded (Lara Croft), the deals
between museums, countries and private institutions would keep them from
being able to work in most places. Blackballing and ostracizing work.
Einstein's theory was far enough out to not require God in the explanation.
Anything that points to special creation is another matter entirely.
Upvote
0