Focused thread, SDA: Feast, New Moon, Sabbath and OT parallels

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,371
10,613
Georgia
✟913,336.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Bob, the topic is how the OT parallel texts form the background of Col. 2.
I show how the OT texts point to certain annual feast and Sabbath days in Lev 23 as shadows given in animal sacrifice and that the same sort of language is used in Col 2.

I show how gentiles are in worship services "every Sabbath" in the book of Acts - in fact in the "Synagogues" hearing the Gospel "every Sabbath" Acts 18:4, Acts 13, Acts 17 ... which means that the Col 2 context/background for Col 2 is that the one thing they are not getting complaints about "is every Sabbath attendance" from either non-Christian Jews, or Christian Jews. What they are getting dinged on is the issue of not being around for annual feast days, annual Sabbaths etc.
The context of Col. 2 is decidedly not about what BobRyan does on a forum.
True - even though you said your only complaint on the weekly Sabbath topic is about "judging others" -

My statements on Col 2 are not about judging others on the weekly Sabbath - as we see here --

================
BobRyan said:

But as Col 2:17-22 point out the problem is not "judging in regard to scripture" but is primarily about "making stuff up".

16 Therefore, no one is to act as your judge in regard to food and drink, or in respect to a festival or a new moon, or a Sabbath day— 17 things which are only a shadow of what is to come; but the substance belongs to Christ. 18 Take care that no one keeps defrauding you of your prize by delighting in humility and the worship of the angels, taking his stand on visions he has seen, inflated without cause by his fleshly mind, 19 and not holding firmly to the head, from whom the entire body, being supplied and held together by the joints and ligaments, grows with a growth which is from God.

20 If you have died with Christ to the elementary principles of the world, why, as if you were living in the world, do you submit yourself to decrees, such as, 21 “Do not handle, do not taste, do not touch!” 22 (which all refer to things destined to perish with use)—in accordance with the commandments and teachings of man? 23 These are matters which do have the appearance of wisdom in self-made religion and humility and severe treatment of the body, but are of no value against fleshly indulgence.

=========================

The OT does not form the basis for "delighting in humility and the worship of the angels"
The OT does not form the basis for "the commandments and teachings of man "
The OT does not form the basis for "taking his stand on visions he has seen, inflated without cause by his fleshly mind,"
All of which we find in Col 2

But we can agree that things like "festival or a new moon" and annual Sabbaths are the kinds of OT "shadows" in Lev 23 that gentiles (who attend a weekly Sabbath service in the Acts 13, Acts 17, Acts 18 synagogues "every Sabbath" ) would be confronted with by both non-Christian Jews and also some Christian Jews - attending along with those gentiles "every Sabbath"


I see the apostle Paul saying that they should not let anyone judge them in regards to these shadows. That therefore informs my take on everything in the list. I don't judge regarding them.
not something I complain about either.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,371
10,613
Georgia
✟913,336.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
You refuse to address the OT passages which list appointed times,
Col 2 does not mention "appointed times" nor does it say "This is referring to all - appointed times" -- as we all know.

Rather the real-world problem that the NT identifies for the gentile Christians at Colossae - is that gentiles attend a weekly Sabbath service in the Acts 13, Acts 17, Acts 18 synagogues "every Sabbath" -- and are there met by both non-Christian Jews and some Christian Jews who would no doubt notice the gentiles are not present for things like "festival or a new moon" and annual Sabbaths ... i.e. OT "shadows" in Lev 23 that originate in animal sacrifices - UNLIKE the weekly Sabbath of Gen 2:1-3, Ex 16, Ex 20:8-11 with no animal sacrifice and with gentiles present "every Sabbath" Acts 18:4
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,371
10,613
Georgia
✟913,336.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
A similar situation existed with the Galatian churches. They were being urged that circumcision and obedience to the law were required for salvation.
Something that even the non-Christian Jews in the Synagogues "every Sabbath" were not saying to gentiles.

Something that Eph 2 says was not even a factor in the OT since gentiles since no OT command declares gentiles must be circumcised to be saved.

In fact as we see in Eph 2 - for all those centuries it was a given that Jew vs gentile was stated in the terms --

11 Therefore remember that previously you, the Gentiles in the flesh, who are called “Uncircumcision” by the so-called “Circumcision” which is performed in the flesh by human hands—

It is not until you get to presence of Christian Jews mixing with Christian Gentiles in the "Every Sabbath" services that this issue comes up - because Christian gentiles are outnumbering Christian Jews.
 
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
31,994
5,856
Visit site
✟878,024.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
In Romana 2:25-29, the way to recognize that a Gentile has a circumcised heart is by observing their obedience to the Torah, which is the same way to tell for a Jew, and circumcision of the heart is a matter of the Spirit


Let's look at it.

25 For circumcision is indeed profitable if you keep the law; but if you are a breaker of the law, your circumcision has become uncircumcision. 26 Therefore, if an uncircumcised man keeps the righteous requirements of the law, will not his uncircumcision be counted as circumcision? 27 And will not the physically uncircumcised, if he fulfills the law, judge you who, even with your written code and circumcision, are a transgressor of the law? 28 For he is not a Jew who is one outwardly, nor is circumcision that which is outward in the flesh; 29 but he is a Jew who is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the Spirit, not in the letter; whose praise is not from men but from God.

The context starts in chapter 1 and culminates in 3:21 in all being guilty of sin, and in need of a righteousness apart from law.

But within that this section references those who are not physically circumcised, and do not have the written code. These are gentiles.

He has already laid down principles by which they may know who God is from general revelation and the conscience:

1:18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who [d]suppress the truth in unrighteousness, 19 because what may be known of God is [e]manifest [f]in them, for God has shown it to them. 20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and [g]Godhead, so that they are without excuse, 21 because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened.

2:12 For as many as have sinned without law will also perish without law, and as many as have sinned in the law will be judged by the law 13 (for not the hearers of the law are just in the sight of God, but the doers of the law will be justified; 14 for when Gentiles, who do not have the law, by nature do the things in the law, these, although not having the law, are a law to themselves, 15 who show the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and between themselves their thoughts accusing or else excusing them) 16 in the day when God will judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ, according to my gospel.

Now the righteous requirements of the law, doing by nature the things in the law, etc. are seen to be perceived in many cases even by those who do not have the Scriptures. Killing, stealing, kidnapping, etc. have been recognized as wrong by many. But we don't see any widespread evidence of people spontaneously keeping the Passover because of their conscience, having no knowledge of it at all, because they do not have the Scriptures.

They did the righteous requirements of the law.
 
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
31,994
5,856
Visit site
✟878,024.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Col 2 does not mention "appointed times" nor does it say "This is referring to all - appointed times" -- as we all know.

It just gives a list of appointed times, like the other listing of appointed times in the OT. Glad you finally got around to addressing the topic--if only to say what it doesn't say, instead of what it does, and how it parallels the OT texts.

Rather the real-world problem that the NT identifies for the gentile Christians at Colossae - is that gentiles attend a weekly Sabbath service in the Acts 13, Acts 17, Acts 18 synagogues "every Sabbath" --

The churches mentioned in proximity to Colossae are home churches, as noted.

And synagogues already had people coming each Sabbath, so it is hardly a surprise they would continue to when people are preaching there in a topic they have an interest in, and to hear the Scriptures.

But as you told The Liturgist in another thread, attending a service is not the same as Sabbath observance.

and are there met by both non-Christian Jews and some Christian Jews who would no doubt notice the gentiles are not present for things like "festival or a new moon" and annual Sabbaths ... i.e. OT "shadows"

Talk about not being in Colossians. The text certainly didn't say anything about "annual" sabbaths. It mentions the sabbaths which in the OT listings included all the Sabbaths.

in Lev 23 that originate in animal sacrifices - UNLIKE the weekly Sabbath of Gen 2:1-3, Ex 16, Ex 20:8-11 with no animal sacrifice and with gentiles present "every Sabbath" Acts 18:4

You did not explain how the new moon points to animal sacrifices. The meaning of the new moon is not spelled out in Numbers 28. Like the other appointed times the sacrifices offered on it are spelled out. We do see some elements of it in other texts, as we do with the Sabbath.

But in any case, we can all see the parallel texts in the OT and know that the weekly Sabbath was included.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
31,994
5,856
Visit site
✟878,024.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Something that even the non-Christian Jews in the Synagogues "every Sabbath" were not saying to gentiles.

Something that Eph 2 says was not even a factor in the OT since gentiles since no OT command declares gentiles must be circumcised to be saved.

In fact as we see in Eph 2 - for all those centuries it was a given that Jew vs gentile was stated in the terms --

11 Therefore remember that previously you, the Gentiles in the flesh, who are called “Uncircumcision” by the so-called “Circumcision” which is performed in the flesh by human hands—

It is not until you get to presence of Christian Jews mixing with Christian Gentiles in the "Every Sabbath" services that this issue comes up - because Christian gentiles are outnumbering Christian Jews.

Sounds like you agree that the likely people judging were Judaizers.

But that doesn't require a synagogue. There was no synagogue in Philipi, but Paul warned about the circumcision party:

2 Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the mutilation! 3 For we are the circumcision, who worship God in the Spirit, rejoice in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh,

And of course they sometimes traveled:

Acts 15:15 And certain men came down from Judea and taught the brethren, “Unless you are circumcised according to the custom of Moses, you cannot be saved.”

Whether the Colossian churches met on Sabbath is not mentioned either, but a service is not sabbath observance.

Either way he still says not to judge on the feasts, new moons and sabbaths, that they are shadows. And we know from the OT parallel texts what that included.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,371
10,613
Georgia
✟913,336.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Sounds like you agree that the likely people judging were Judaizers.
Indeed those Christians were a problem... but so also the non-Christian jews in those same Sabbath services with attending Christian gentiles who were there on Sabbath as Acts informs us - but were likely not there on annual holy days.
But that doesn't require a synagogue.
Indeed - all it requires is a gathering of those who worship the one true God on His Holy Sabbath day. As Acts 16:11-15 shows (where once again we see a mix of Christian and non-Christian worshippers on Sabbath - and we see the preaching of the Gospel on Sabbath)
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,371
10,613
Georgia
✟913,336.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Whether the Colossian churches met on Sabbath is not mentioned either

We "could imagine" entirely different worship services and practices in Colossae unlike what is documented in Acts etc - but it is always best to stay with the pattern shown to us by the NT text.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,371
10,613
Georgia
✟913,336.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
It just gives a list of appointed times, like the other listing of appointed times in the OT.
But never says "these are all the appointed times in scripture" which you seem to "need it" to mean.
It is highly unlikely that Christian and non-Christian Jews are meeting with gentile believers "Every Sabbath" Acts 18:4 - were complaining that they were not seeing gentile believers "every Sabbath"
 
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
31,994
5,856
Visit site
✟878,024.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Indeed those Christians were a problem... but so also the non-Christian jews in those same Sabbath services with attending Christian gentiles who were there on Sabbath as Acts informs us - but were likely not there on annual holy days.

Indeed - all it requires is a gathering of those who worship the one true God on His Holy Sabbath day. As Acts 16:11-15 shows (where once again we see a mix of Christian and non-Christian worshippers on Sabbath - and we see the preaching of the Gospel on Sabbath)

We "could imagine" entirely different worship services and practices in Colossae unlike what i documented in Acts etc - but it is always best to stay with the pattern shown to us by the NT text.

You ignored the data that we do have, which was that the churches and people in the greeting were in home churches, and not stated to be meeting on the Sabbath as the other texts indicate. And you have not demonstrated regular Jewish Christian presence.

So appealing to texts about other locations is just a way of admitting the text does not indicate what these in the case of Colossae.

We do know there was a sizable Jewish population in the area from other sources, who may have judged Christians for not keeping all of the above. And we know from Scripture the Judaizers would travel at times.

But even if you demonstrated this regular Jewish Christian presence, or if we assumed it, you also never addressed your own objection to others--Attending a service is not Sabbath observance.

And there is no record of either Sabbath attendance or observance in the case of the Colossians in the text.

Moreover, if they were not in fact keeping the commandment then attendance may highlight that even more. Certainly there were visitors for extended periods at the Adventist churches I attended who came to services but did not accept Adventist doctrines or observe the Sabbath. And the Adventist members certainly noticed when they discussed or interacted with them.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
31,994
5,856
Visit site
✟878,024.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
But never says "these are all the appointed times in scripture" which you seem to "need it" to mean.

I don't need it to mean anything. I seek to understand what it does mean by Scripture.

These short form listings appears several times in the OT. The primary long-form text of Numbers 28 and 29 spell out the contents of which the lists summarize and reference.

And in one case Ezekiel 45, we have both the short list and verification of the contents including the weekly Sabbath in the immediate context. Paul was certainly not ignorant of Scriptural usage.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,371
10,613
Georgia
✟913,336.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
You ignored the data that we do have, which was that the churches and people in the greeting were in home churches, and not stated to be meeting on the Sabbath

1. Greetings don't mention which day of the week members met -- as we all know.
2. Titus 1 makes it clear that the opposition was coming from Christian Jews - just as I stated previously.

Acts shows repeatedly that they were meeting "Sabbath after Sabbath" for gospel preaching -- in fact "every Sabbath" Acts 18:4 - for gospel preaching to gentiles and Jews in the synagogue.


as the other texts indicate. And you have not demonstrated regular Jewish Christian presence.
Titus 1 makes it very clear that they were getting false doctrine pressure from the Christian Jews -

7 For a bishop must be blameless, as a steward of God, not self-willed, not quick-tempered, not given to wine, not violent, not greedy for money, 8 but hospitable, a lover of what is good, sober-minded, just, holy, self-controlled, 9 holding fast the faithful word as he has been taught, that he may be able, by sound doctrine, both to exhort and convict those who contradict.​
10 For there are many insubordinate, both idle talkers and deceivers, especially those of the circumcision, 11 whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole households, teaching things which they ought not, for the sake of dishonest gain. 12 One of them, a prophet of their own, said, “Cretans are always liars, evil beasts, lazy gluttons.” 13 This testimony is true. Therefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith, 14 not giving heed to Jewish fables and commandments of men who turn from the truth.​

Those Jewish false teachers were under the admin of the Bishop/Elder in the church -- and he was responsible for stopping their work of false doctrine.

So appealing to texts about other locations is just a way of admitting the text does not indicate
false. It is a way of making a statement consistent with the practice of the NT church well documented in the book of Acts.

The point remains.
.. you also never addressed your own objection to others--Attending a service is not Sabbath observance.
I never stated an objection to Christians attending one of the appointed times in Lev 23 -- I just note that in Col 2 Paul argues against being judged for attending/not-attending ... and that such judgment was primarily based on "making stuff up" as Col 2 shows.

details matter.
And there is no record of either Sabbath attendance or observance

There is "Every Sabbath" attendance/observance in Acts 18 and we see it in "city after city after city" in the book of Acts for both gentiles and Jews - and we both know it.
Moreover, if they were not in fact keeping the commandment then attendance may highlight that even more.
It makes no sense to argue that people not keeping the Bible Sabbath were showing up for worship "every Sabbath". I suppose you already know that.
 
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
31,994
5,856
Visit site
✟878,024.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
1. Greetings don't mention which day of the week members met -- as we all know.

Yes, which is why I said we are not told in the text. But they do indicate home churches.

We can't decide what is in the letter. We can note what is not.

2. Titus 1 makes it clear that the opposition was coming from Christian Jews - just as I stated previously.

The judaizers traveled, as I mentioned previously as well.

However, Titus was being sent to Crete. So that again does not speak directly to the situation of the Colossians.

Acts shows repeatedly that they were meeting "Sabbath after Sabbath" for gospel preaching -- in fact "every Sabbath" Acts 18:4 - for gospel preaching to gentiles and Jews in the synagogue.

a. in places other than Colossae

b. until they weren't, meeting every day instead.

No one has disputed that gentiles who were attending Jewish Synagogues prior to the arrival of Paul in places other than Colossae were attending Jewish synagogues for weeks after Paul arrived.

But you have not demonstrated a commitment to Sabbath observance among the the gentile attendees. You have demonstrated Sabbath attendance.

And this whole line of questioning is a distraction. You started it by saying how would the subject come up unless the situation you assume was happening in Colossae was actually happening. But you and I have both noted that situation is not necessary for it to come up, because the judaizers traveled.

Titus 1 makes it very clear that they were getting false doctrine pressure from the Christian Jews -

7 For a bishop must be blameless, as a steward of God, not self-willed, not quick-tempered, not given to wine, not violent, not greedy for money, 8 but hospitable, a lover of what is good, sober-minded, just, holy, self-controlled, 9 holding fast the faithful word as he has been taught, that he may be able, by sound doctrine, both to exhort and convict those who contradict.​
10 For there are many insubordinate, both idle talkers and deceivers, especially those of the circumcision, 11 whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole households, teaching things which they ought not, for the sake of dishonest gain. 12 One of them, a prophet of their own, said, “Cretans are always liars, evil beasts, lazy gluttons.” 13 This testimony is true. Therefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith, 14 not giving heed to Jewish fables and commandments of men who turn from the truth.​

Those Jewish false teachers were under the admin of the Bishop/Elder in the church -- and he was responsible for stopping their work of false doctrine.

You did note he referenced the mission to Crete there right?

But again this is a distraction. We already know, and I posited early on in this discussion, that the circumcision party was known to travel.


false. It is a way of making a statement consistent with the practice of the NT church well documented in the book of Acts.

The point remains.

Your documenting practices in various places does not document practices in another place. And the practice you documented was not the one you wanted in the first place. Attendance is not Sabbath observance.

And of course, you documented not what happened at distinctive Christian worship services, such as those spelled out in I Corinthians, which I quoted earlier. You documented Paul's evangelistic method of taking the gospel first to the Jews, and then the gentiles.

I never stated an objection to Christians attending one of the appointed times in Lev 23 -- I just note that in Col 2 Paul argues against being judged for attending/not-attending ... and that such judgment was primarily based on "making stuff up" as Col 2 shows.

details matter.

Then you might want to read again what I said because that was not the point I was making.

The gentiles attending synagogues in towns before Paul ever arrived does not say what was happening in Colossae.

But the point of the above statement was that you have not demonstrated even in those locations that the gentile attendees each sabbath were observant of the command to rest. You have only demonstrated attendance. And as you told the Liturgist in the other thread, those are not the same.

Their attendance at these synagogues was not derived form the distinctive pattern of Christian worship in the area, as it predated the arrival of Paul and his team.

Passages in I Corinthians spell out distinctively Christian worship apart from synagogue attendance, and it makes no reference to sabbath, but does include the Lord's supper, exercise of spiritual gifts, participation of members, etc.

We know they had already left the synagogue in Corinth as well. For those places where the synagogue was not hostile they did not leave immediately.

There is "Every Sabbath" attendance/observance in Acts 18 and we see it in "city after city after city" in the book of Acts for both gentiles and Jews - and we both know it.

Yes, and we both know it was going on before Paul ever arrived. And in the case of leaving for the lecture hall of Tyrannus turned into every day, and we both know it.

It makes no sense to argue that people not keeping the Bible Sabbath were showing up for worship "every Sabbath". I suppose you already know that.

Of course it does. Gentile inquirers who were God fearers attended synagogues, but were not necessarily full converts. And given that those referenced in gentile churches were not yet physically circumcised, including the Colossians because Paul refers to them as being circumcised without hands, they were apparently not full converts.

The gentile converts generally were not circumcised or the judaizers wouldn't be trying to compel them to be so! So your assumption is that they were observing a Sabbath rest. That is not in the text, and it does not follow that non-converts would be. The text says they attended. And in some cases the attendance grew. And then when they had resistance they met in at least one case daily.

And of course this whole line of discussion was a distraction as you asked how it would come up otherwise, but the judaizers are a known means of it coming up.



And of course you are reading the practice of synagogue attendance of gentiles in other locations into Colossae without reference to such in the text.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,371
10,613
Georgia
✟913,336.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
BobRyan said:
1. Greetings (at the start of Paul's letters) don't mention which day of the week members met -- as we all know.
Yes, which is why I said we are not told in the text.
Exegesis does not limit itself to one verse. It includes all verses that pertain to the subject.
But they do indicate home churches.
Titus 1 points to those churches having Jewish pressure from their own members (as Paul points out in Ex 20 - it is from their own members) that are just as I noted earlier. And Acts does point to weekly Sabbath meetings having both gentiles and Jews.

We also see that in Acts 13,, Acts 16, Acts 17, Acts 18.. IT is THE pattern in the NT for weekly worship services.
We can't decide what is in the letter.
We don't dictate what is in it - but exegesis allows us to understand the context and it allows us to LOOK at the practice for the NT church weekly - meetings in the book of Acts.

From what I have seen - Judaizers are NOT the same as non-Christian Jews trying to get all christians banished from city after city. (A group we ALSO see identified in the book of acts).

Judaizers are Christian Jews and they tend to be local to a given congregation , attending each week in the local congregation
 
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
31,994
5,856
Visit site
✟878,024.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
BobRyan said:

Exegesis does not limit itself to one verse. It includes all verses that pertain to the subject.


a. You didn't present one text from the actual setting of Colossians that supports your view.

b. Pointing out the situation in different locations doesn't tell us the situation in this location. And the details that are in this section, in more than one verse don't support your thesis.

- he refers to all of the Colossians as circumcised without hands.
"In Him you were also circumcised with the circumcision made without hands"

- instead of speaking about judging one another he says let no one judge you. "So let no one judge you." Compare this with the language in Romans 14 "But why do you judge your brother? Or why do you show contempt for your brother?"

- Paul highlights the the fulfilled mystery of God among the "gentiles":
"1:27 To them God willed to make known what are the riches of the glory of this mystery among the Gentiles: which is Christ in you, the hope of glory. "

But once again, this line of argument is a distraction. It doesn't matter whether there were regular-attending sabbath observing Christian Jews in the congregation. Either way they were not be judged on the shadows in the list.

Titus 1 points to those churches having Jewish pressure from their own members (as Paul points out in Ex 20 - it is from their own members) that are just as I noted earlier. And Acts does point to weekly Sabbath meetings having both gentiles and Jews.

Of course they do. But it turns out you can't assume everything works the same way everywhere. And if you could demonstrate such in Colossae you already would have. But more to the point, it doesn't matter who is doing the criticizing. The elements in the list are shadows, and not something to judge regarding.

And the OT texts give the theological background for those lists.

We also see that in Acts 13,, Acts 16, Acts 17, Acts 18.. IT is THE pattern in the NT for weekly worship services.

What we see is the usual method of Paul in bringing the gospel to an area:

Acts 13:46 Then Paul and Barnabas grew bold and said, “It was necessary that the word of God should be spoken to you first; but since you reject it, and judge yourselves unworthy of everlasting life, behold, we turn to the Gentiles. 47 For so the Lord has commanded us:

‘I have set you as a light to the Gentiles,
That you should be for salvation to the ends of the earth.’ ”

48 Now when the Gentiles heard this, they were glad and glorified the word of the Lord. And as many as had been appointed to eternal life believed.

Corinth was one of the places where this was used. But as we saw in the last post the distinct Christian worship in Corinth was not a synagogue service but happened when they all came together and celebrated the Lord's supper, exercised spiritual gifts, etc.

We also see in Troas a distinctly Christian gathering and time of teaching and dialogue.

We don't dictate what is in it - but exegesis allows us to understand the context and it allows us to LOOK at the practice for the NT church weekly - meetings in the book of Acts.

You ignored the immediate context of acts showing home churches, circumcision without hands, being judged on these matters from without, etc.

And you ignored the theological context of the OT lists.

From what I have seen - Judaizers are NOT the same as non-Christian Jews trying to get all christians banished from city after city. (A group we ALSO see identified in the book of acts).

Judaizers are Christian Jews and they tend to be local to a given congregation , attending each week in the local congregation

What you see ignores the already referenced traveling judaizers mentioned in Acts. And you didn't look at the statements in Colossians.

And again it is a distraction from the OT lists.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Adventist Heretic

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Sep 18, 2006
5,026
455
Parts Unknown
✟370,993.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I think it’s important to consider all scripture and not just one scripture without seeking for its true context, especially when trying to do away with a commandment of God that He personally wrote and He personally spoke and is kept in the Most Holy of His Temple which is also in heaven Rev 11:19.

God separated the weekly Sabbath from the annual sabbath(s) and there is a reason for that. The weekly Sabbath was part of God's perfect plan before sin Genesis 2:1-3 and points us back to the God of Creation and His sanctifying and creative power. God hallowed the Sabbath Exodus 20:11 and He identifies the Sabbath as My holy day Isaiah 58:13 and even if He didn't command man to also keep His Sabbath day holy we are not to profane God's holy things. Eze 22:26. We are made in the image of God to follow Him, not to do our own thing. There is no scripture that says God took back the seventh day Sabbath as His holy day. Instead Jesus kept the Sabbath and all of the commandments and is our example to follow. 1 John 2:6.

The Sabbath is one of His commandments written personally by God kept inside the ark of the covenant in the Most Holy of God’s Temple and these are the works of God. Exodus 32:16. We cannot add or subtract to God’s commandments Deut 4:2 and once God blesses something like He did the Sabbath day, man cannot reverse Num 23:20 so we would need a thus saith the Lord to say we no longer need to keep this commandment of God. There is no such scripture in all of God’s Word, so who’s will is it that we forget the one commandment God said to Remember? It certainly is not God’s almost every scripture regarding the Sabbath from Creation to the New Heavens/New Earth about keeping the Sabbath holy has a thus saith the Lord.

The context is ordinances and if one backed up to Col 2:14 KJV, they would see this…

Col 2:14 Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross;

The Sabbath is finger written by God Exo 31:18 not handwritten, it is holy and blessed which is not the definition for contrary and against and it is a commandment of God, which is not the same as an ordinance according to scripture Neh 9:13

Col 2:13-17 KJV is referring to the old sanctuary system which all pointed forward to Christ. Hebrews 9:9-12 Hebrews 10:1-10 It had to do with food and drink offerings, feast days and festivals and many of those were also called annual sabbath(s) which were ordinances Exodus 12:43 which all pointed to Jesus who became our Passover Lamb 1 Cor 5:7 who took away the sins of the world. Instead of sacrificing animals in NC Jesus is our perfect Sacrifice and High Priest and we can go directly to Him when we sin and have a change in heart. Sin is still the same as it as always been and is the transgression of God’s law 1 John 3:4 and Paul points right to the Ten Commandments to define the law that defines sin Romans 7:7. The Ten Commandments are just that, they came in a unit of Ten that God placed together ,no man can separate and cannot be edited because man is not above God and if we break one of these commandments we break them all and it is what we will be judged by. James 2:10-12.

Col 2:14-17 KJV doesn’t fit with the context of the weekly Sabbath commandment or reconcile with God’s Word in any way, yet people continue down this path for some strange reason. Jesus refutes this theory from His own Words saying the Sabbath would be kept by His followers decades after the Cross Matthew 24:20 and we see the apostles keeping every Sabbath decades after the Cross as they were commanded to observe everything Jesus commanded of them and the Sabbath will be kept in heaven for the saints for eternity Isaiah 66:22-23. The saints keep the commandments of God and faith in Jesus Rev 14:12 and the Sabbath is a commandment of God, blessed by God that no man can reverse. God just wants to spend time with His people on the day He set aside sanctified, blessed and made holy to do so. We cannot sanctify ourselves only God can Eze 20:12 yet people still try.
Tall,

I have come to some conclusion of the passages such as these. ACTS 15, Col 2, Gal & Hebrews. I don't believe it is as hard as everyone wants to make it. using your criteria "I can't be this hard we are supposed to be able to understand this. I think sabbath keeper freak out when they read passages like this because on the surface it looks like he is saying do keep the Sabbath, so they panic and try to defend the sabbath despite the evidence. no-sabbath keeper do a surface reading and say "see" done away with, get lost legalist. both are wrong.

It is clearly talking about the Sabbath in that passage, no question. But what is says is "Don't let anyone Judge you concerning these things....." then list a bunch of things. Notice it says
1. Someone is Judging them about these things
2. They are not to listen to them about those things.

Now look at what it does not say.
1. Stop doing those things
2. Stop listening to us about those things.

So the key to this issue is who is doing the Judging? The scripture never says specifically who it is, but it tells us they were Judging about circumcision, sacrifice, sabbath,new moons festivals, meat and drink. and other things.

Well one question has to be asked.
1. Who cares and would be judging about ALL of those things? only one group of people. JEWS. not Jewish -Christians, But JEWS. Why because in order to receive the blessings of the covenant you have to follow the instructions completely. Well the gentile Christians were not doing it exactly the right way, that is a problem for the Jews. How can these gentiles get all these blessings and do everything correctly. The Jews were upset and the were trying to give them proper instruction, They were saying Jesus is not enough to be reconciled back to the father and Jesus is not enough to receive the blessing. He is not saying don't keep them, rather don't let the Jews set the adjenda about them.
 
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
31,994
5,856
Visit site
✟878,024.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Tall,

I have come to some conclusion of the passages such as these. ACTS 15, Col 2, Gal & Hebrews. I don't believe it is as hard as everyone wants to make it. using your criteria "I can't be this hard we are supposed to be able to understand this. I think sabbath keeper freak out when they read passages like this because on the surface it looks like he is saying do keep the Sabbath, so they panic and try to defend the sabbath despite the evidence. no-sabbath keeper do a surface reading and say "see" done away with, get lost legalist. both are wrong.

It is clearly talking about the Sabbath in that passage, no question.

Yes, I agree, the OT parallel texts are clear, that it includes the Sabbath.

But what is says is "Don't let anyone Judge you concerning these things....." then list a bunch of things. Notice it says
1. Someone is Judging them about these things
2. They are not to listen to them about those things.

Now look at what it does not say.
1. Stop doing those things
2. Stop listening to us about those things.

Agreed, it says do not let anyone judge you in regards to them.

So the key to this issue is who is doing the Judging? The scripture never says specifically who it is, but it tells us they were Judging about circumcision, sacrifice, sabbath,new moons festivals, meat and drink. and other things.

Well one question has to be asked.
1. Who cares and would be judging about ALL of those things? only one group of people. JEWS. not Jewish -Christians, But JEWS. Why because in order to receive the blessings of the covenant you have to follow the instructions completely.

Well the gentile Christians were not doing it exactly the right way, that is a problem for the Jews. How can these gentiles get all these blessings and do everything correctly. The Jews were upset and the were trying to give them proper instruction, They were saying Jesus is not enough to be reconciled back to the father and Jesus is not enough to receive the blessing. He is not saying don't keep them, rather don't let the Jews set the adjenda about them.

I actually think it could be the Jews or the Judaizers. The Judaizers also thought they had to be circucised to be saved, and they wanted the gentiles to be commanded to keep the law of Moses. Paul called their assertions another gospel, and to accept it "falling from grace."

Now where we agree is it does not say "don't keep them."

But there is another element that needs to be addressed. It calls everything in the list shadows, including the Sabbath.
 
Upvote 0

Adventist Heretic

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Sep 18, 2006
5,026
455
Parts Unknown
✟370,993.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Yes, I agree, the OT parallel texts are clear, that it includes the Sabbath.



Agreed, it says do not let anyone judge you in regards to them.



I actually think it could be the Jews or the Judaizers. The Judaizers also thought they had to be circucised to be saved.
well there may be a passage that refere to Judaizers, you need to prove that is who Paul has in mind. you cannot assume that.
And Paul called their assertions another gospel, and to accept it "falling from grace."
where did he say that.
Now where we agree is it does not say "don't keep them."
yes, that is obvious.
But there is another element that needs to be addressed. It calls everything in the list shadows, including the Sabbath.
yes. the sabbath is not Jesus, but it is connected to him and it does represent him. for that reason it is a valid option. you can encounter the Lord in fact that is when I expect him to come for visitation and his presence to be encounterd. I still think the SDA end times view are basicly correct.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
31,994
5,856
Visit site
✟878,024.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
well there may be a passage that refere to Judaizers, you need to prove that is who Paul has in mind. you cannot assume that.

I don't assume it. Nor do I think it is critical either way. That is why I said it could be the Judaizers or the Jews in the area. It is apparently someone from the outside, because he says don't let them judge you, rather than don't judge one another.

where did he say that.

I was speaking of the Judaizer situation generally, because, as noted earlier in the thread, they are seen to travel in some cases. Those statements are not found in Colossians, but in Galatians. And of course Acts 15 spells out their baseline, that you have to be circumcised to be saved, and that gentiles must be commanded to keep the law of Moses.

yes. the sabbath is not Jesus, but it is connected to him and it does represent him. for that reason it is a valid option.

How do you see the new moon and feasts in that same line?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Adventist Heretic

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Sep 18, 2006
5,026
455
Parts Unknown
✟370,993.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I don't assume it. Nor do I think it is critical either way. That is why I said it could be the Judaizers or the Jews in the area. It is apparently someone from the outside, because he says don't let them judge you, rather than don't judge one another.



I was speaking of the Judaizer situation generally, because, as noted earlier in the thread, they are seen to travel in some cases. Those statements are not found in Colossians, but in Galatians.
Yes Galatians is a theological treaty and address may things.
And of course Acts 15 spells out their baseline, that you have to be circumcised to be saved, and that gentiles must be commanded to keep the law of Moses.
where is the circumcision issue. is that prior to the standard. As I understand it, they are setting the minimum standard for attending the synagouge so as to not offend their Jewish host.
How do you see the new moon and feasts in that same line?
again I am not sure about that stuff. I spent time with the feast keepers while in CA for 10 years. so I am familuer with them. learned a lot from them, however the thing that really bothered me were 2 things the absloute detail they would go to, observe them. the New Moon they would labor for hours on when they were supposed to start it. where do you start from sunset in Jerusalem or local or somewhere else. talk about mind numblingly boring. I enjoy a theological discussion but that was too much.

also the way they would keep the sabbath, was literally you could not even microwave, that was working, mind you not the person the machine. Then there was the way they interacted and treated one another. The father of the house was such a ******** to everyone he abused his wife, his son, he literally destroyed the life of his child. Now tell me do you think I want to go and join that? Sorry No. there was no Love and No freedom. Plus he was a messy pig. So not a good example.

I also think theologically they are post fall additions and my Sabbath view are rooted in pre-fal sabbath Fellowship with God.
 
Upvote 0