Edwin Wright
Active Member
- Mar 23, 2023
- 242
- 19
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Single
Your referenced article does not appear to have a named author. The following does:
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Your referenced article does not appear to have a named author. The following does:Flat earth belief dormant for centuries....took off here about 2012...
Why the Flat Earth is Not Biblical
The problem with explaining the (so-called) Coriolis effect is that it does not exist. See ANALYSIS OF A NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC VIDEO IMPLIES THAT THE EARTH IS STATIONARY and Heliocentrism Refuted: Experimental Proof of a Stationary Earth.Ita not a false claim if I see it with my eyes.
How do you explain the Coriolis affect on earth? It iant mentioned as part of the creation story and yet it exists
Would you care to summarize the argument as you are the one who believes it?The problem with explaining the (so-called) Coriolis effect is that it does not exist. See ANALYSIS OF A NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC VIDEO IMPLIES THAT THE EARTH IS STATIONARY and Heliocentrism Refuted: Experimental Proof of a Stationary Earth.
Ita not a false claim if I see it with my eyes.
How do you explain the Coriolis affect on earth? It iant mentioned as part of the creation story and yet it exists
The Bible is NOT a scientific document. If you choose to go down that path it is your folly-I do not have to explain it, The Bible gives adequate creation descriptions to know that what God created is not what science states is the creation.
The Bible is NOT a scientific document. If you choose to go down that path it is your folly
But you are treating it as if it was.-Never said it was.
I dont doubt that God created the universe but I have no idea HOW he did it....."set in the vault" Is a poor description of sky bodies that move through the sky daily and over monthly and yearly cycles too.But God being creator of His creation. Certainly has the right to give an account of His creation in The Bible. As people who state they are believers in God, should believe His creation descriptions.
Just so you are aware, this man is frequently repeating a single argument that hinges on ONE misunderstanding of the mapping of plane travel. This guy tossed up some very impressive looking math (but it's gr8 level stuff). But the math is a distraction from the fact that the argumentThe problem with explaining the (so-called) Coriolis effect is that it does not exist. See ANALYSIS OF A NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC VIDEO IMPLIES THAT THE EARTH IS STATIONARY and Heliocentrism Refuted: Experimental Proof of a Stationary Earth.
Can you provide objective evidence supporting your assertion that computers plot the course taking the Coriolis effect into account?Would you care to summarize the argument as you are the one who believes it?
Because there is, of course, physical evidence that it exists.
And these articles reay don't say what your video says it does
ok ok. Ao i decided to check out your evidence. Please be gracious.
1. The passage uses the word "spinning" 5 times in its analogy to point out that the article says its not spinning. I wonder if someone is misunderstanding the analogy.
2. The hard hitting rebuttal is that "no it aint".
3. It goes on to describe that "because airplanes don't have to do periodic course corrections" it's flying north. Of course thats basically true but...
Computers plot the course taking the coreolis effect into account. And still there are small course corrections.
I'm sorry. Just because a website looks convincing doesn't mean it is a reliable source of information.
Please enlighten me. What is that ONE misunderstanding of the mapping of plane travel?Just so you are aware, this man is frequently repeating a single argument that hinges on ONE misunderstanding of the mapping of plane travel. This guy tossed up some very impressive looking math (but it's gr8 level stuff). But the math is a distraction from the fact that the argument
Itself is flimsy.
In any case, if you'd like to do a science experiment with me, to show you the earth's curve I would love to do it!! I'm in edmonton alberta canada. Where are you?
Actually that invitations is open to anyone! Dm me if you want
But you are treating it as if it was.
I dont doubt that God created the universe but I have no idea HOW he did it....."set in the vault" Is a poor description of sky bodies that move through the sky daily and over monthly and yearly cycles too.
Well. I'm having a hard time believing it would be worth my time.Can you provide objective evidence supporting your assertion that computers plot the course taking the Coriolis effect into account?
Oops. The 6th and 7th word in the Bible?-All you do is read science into The Bible, so how can you ever see what The Bible is saying about God's creation. Not a single place in The Bible does The Bible state God created a universe, God creation is always stated as heaven and earth.
-Never said it was. But God being creator of His creation. Certainly has the right to give an account of His creation in The Bible. As people who state they are believers in God, should believe His creation descriptions.
I am not asking for tertiary evidence. You airplanes account for the Coriolis effectWell. I'm having a hard time believing it would be worth my time.
There are pictures and experiments that prove the earth's spheroid. They are easy to find amd I am sure you've seen them.
And if you will dismiss reasonable physical evidence, I'm not excited to provide evidence for this assertion since it could easily (though not appropriately) be dismissed as subjective or tainted evidence.
I've brought up foucaults Pendulum a couple times because it ACTUALLY demonstrates the coriolis effect. So there's no point in even arguing about airplanes. You can see it with your eyes. That is direct primary evidence of its existence. Why ask for evidence of tertiary evidence?
I am not asking for tertiary evidence. You made the assertion that computers plot the course taking the Coriolis effect into account, implying that you have some technical knowledge of commercial aviation operations in that regard. If that is the case, then please refer to a specific technical document that objectively demonstrates that (alleged) technical capability. If you are unable to point to such a document, then your assertion is nothing more than wishful thinking.Well. I'm having a hard time believing it would be worth my time.
There are pictures and experiments that prove the earth's spheroid. They are easy to find amd I am sure you've seen them.
And if you will dismiss reasonable physical evidence, I'm not excited to provide evidence for this assertion since it could easily (though not appropriately) be dismissed as subjective or tainted evidence.
I've brought up foucaults Pendulum a couple times because it ACTUALLY demonstrates the coriolis effect. So there's no point in even arguing about airplanes. You can see it with your eyes. That is direct primary evidence of its existence. Why ask for evidence of tertiary evidence?
1) I don't have access to "specific technical documentation"...I am not asking for tertiary evidence. You airplanes account for the Coriolis effect
I am not asking for tertiary evidence. You made the assertion that computers plot the course taking the Coriolis effect into account, implying that you have some technical knowledge of commercial aviation operations in that regard. If that is the case, then please refer to a specific technical document that objectively demonstrates that (alleged) technical capability. If you are unable to point to such a document, then your assertion is nothing more than wishful thinking.
Planes are controlled. There is a guidance system (such as a pilot) which is trying to keep it on course. This is important because there are forces that will deflect the plane off course which are orders of magnitude more powerful than the Coriolis effect. If there was not active correction, those other forces would virtually guarantee that we never arrived at our destination.
Because there's a guidance system in play, we rapidly trim the aircraft to counteract the Coriolis effect as a side effect of trying to trim the aircraft for all of the much bigger forces at play. There may be a slight deflection of the rudder associated with the Coriolis effect, but you would be hard pressed to identify it amidst all the other forces.
Oops. The 6th and 7th word in the Bible?
"The heavens".
Not heaven.
"Heavens" IS another word for universe and outer space. I've never heard someone call outerspace "heaven".Heaven can be used as heavens or heaven. This still does not change the fact that heaven is not another word for universe or outer space.
Ok. So why did you choose "vault" instead of "sky"? And, given that these heavenly bodies are NOT "set" in the sky in ANY way, how are you explaining your, otherwise LITERAL translation?In The Bible there is the heaven (raqia Hebrew) that in English is known as dome, sky, firmament, expanse, vault. This heaven which is seperating two bodies of water, one the seas or oceans and another body of water above the raqia. This area is where the sun, moon and stars were placed by God when He created them.
"Heavens" IS another word for universe and outer space. I've never heard someone call outerspace "heaven".
Ok. So why did you choose "vault" instead of "sky"? And, given that these heavenly bodies are NOT "set" in the sky in ANY way, how are you explaining your, otherwise LITERAL translation?
And God didn't "PLACE" them right there because they unseen at night and they move around. As mentioned, the sun moves around A LOT; so much so that it's illogical to suggested it was "placed" anywhere.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?