People shouldn't even waste their time lol...I've played this game before.
It's a never-ending moving goalposts cycle. No matter what you provide, they'll always have some reason why that evidence "isn't real".
-Every piece of tangible, visual evidence like photos will be dismissed as "photoshopped"
-Every eyewitness report from astronauts and member of the ISS & NASA will be dismissed as "they're in on it because they'll be killed if they don't propagate the lie"
The irony is, they get their "evidence" from blogs using a very in-depth research technique.
It goes a little something like:
View attachment 247095
Here's the part I can't figure out...
Why? At least with the anti-vaxxers and the 9/11 truthers, there's at least a somewhat cogent explanation for "Why" the "powers that be" do what they do. For instance, the 9/11 truthers believe it was an inside job, so that the Bush administration could have an excuse to get military involvement in order to be able to shell out money to cronies in the defense industry. Their theory is junk, but at least there's an answer to "why?" when you ask them.
I don't know that the same exists for Flat Earth theorists...when I've asked this of them, I never really get an answer other than just a generic opposition to mainstream science due to the mainstream scientific community holding some other view that oppose their religious preferences.