Being a sphere or not doesn't seem as important as placing Earth into a Copernican cosmology, i.e. nothing special about Earth's place in the universe
Just one thing, and one thing only. God the Creator Himself came here, and died, and rose again. Don't you reckon that's a bit more important than a higher mountain or a deeper ocean?
just another speck of matter hurdling through the vacuum.
You'd prefer a s
pecial speck? You feeling neglected because there's nothing particularly
special about the world God put us on?
A geocentric or flat earth would shatter Copernicanism, obviously
Who cares? You have a wager with Copernicus or something?
The institution of modern science is rather obsessive about maintaining that Copernican worldview... For example, just look at how they call this recent observation "evil"...
Oh, the horror! But if you're already mad at Nick Copernicus anyway, what's the problem?
To get a better idea of where you're coming from, do you see the book of Exodus as real history? Do you believe the entire nation of Israel walked through the miraculously parted Red Sea as described?
Sure, why not? But then, the Gospel doesn't depend on my guessing right on the question, does it?
Modern science and archaeology affirms this never happened, and that there is no evidence of it happening in that time period.
OK. Binary solution set - either it did or it didn't. That's not the Gospel. The Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us. That's the fact on which our salvation depends. not on getting the answers in a Bible quiz correct.
"For God, according to these Philosophers, makes and governs a natural World that is capable of governing itself, and that might have made itself as well, had they not pass'd a needless and insignificant Compliment upon, the Creator."
Well dang, that's obviously ungood. So what? We have people in this day and time who believe that the earth is flat, which is even more ridiculous than that.
en.wikipedia.org
You love you some deism, don't you? You need to find you some deists and go haggle with them. They're scarce in these parts.
Modern science will only ever arrive at a cosmological model where God is unnecessary.
Because you find that this universe is too complex for God to have made? Tiny God Syndrome again.
Undirected natural processes have everything covered.
"Undirected" is your notion.
. but hey let's be nice and give God the credit for nature so everybody's happy, especially the atheists who can go around saying there is no evidence at all for a Creator.
How about giving God credit for having created a universe that's far too huge, and marvelous, and intricate, and elegant, and precise, and beautiful, and in general stunningly magnificent, for you to conprehend, and so you have to mentally shrink it down to something that you can get your exceedingly finite mind to more or less grasp.
Basically, since the time of the Enlightenment, the pioneers of modern cosmology have been fixated on advancing a *Deistic* universe.
To the lake with your "deist" rubbish. Beat that strawman on your own time, no one here cares. Have a go at the Zoroastrians while you're at it, there my actually be some of those left around to care
They have no problem with a creator god... as long as it's a distant, hidden god (whom they refer to as Nature's god)
Blah, blah, blah, so what? Our God became flesh and dwelt among us remember that? He was crucified and rose again. He ascended into Heaven. He is the First and the Last. So what does some other religion's notion of God have to do with anything?
Even our God's chosen people rejected Him. He came unto His own and His own reeived Him not. They may have believed some of the same stuff about the universe that you do; how did it help them? They thumped their Bibles and shouted "Crucify Him!" What was more important? Having the "correct" view of Creation? (They were wrong about that, too.)
that can only be discovered through reason and nature. (and definitely not learned of through writings handed down by bronze-age goat-herders, an idea which Enlightenment men found abhorrent and insulting)
See above. The Scribes and Phariees had the OT down by heart. How'd that work out for them?
The idea of creation or earth history being revealed by the visions of Moses drove these deists and natural philosophers wild.
Again, find yourself some deists and natural philosophers to rail at. While you're at it, you can find some Jews who still take the Creation narratives as actual history as literally true and hang out with them, Nemmind their rejection of the Creator coming here in the Flesh, they take the Creation narrative literally, and that's the main thing, right?
They wanted nothing more than to abolish that history
How'd that work out?
, and so they became ideologically committed to the Copernican principle and so nothing about the Earth can possibly be special.
I guess our hope of eternal life is based on the earth being "special", zat it?