Flat earther proves globe...

[Justatruthseeker]

It's quite obvious that you don't do any of your own thinking for yourself, as you previously admitted that you would not possibly admit to being wrong about the shape of the earth under any circumstances.

No one will on either side, that’s obvious...

 

[pitabread]

We've discussed that previously.

I don't think we have actually.

So let's talk about it: you're claiming you are educated on a subject. How do you substantiate that education?

 

[SeventyOne]

I don't think we have actually.

So let's talk about it: you're claiming you are educated on a subject. How do you substantiate that education?

Well, we have, and even if we haven't, give me a good reason why I have to explain anything about myself to you.

 

[pitabread]

Well, we have, and even if we haven't, give me a good reason why I have to explain anything about myself to you.

Because you are the one who keeps talking about your superior education/knowledge/whatever. If you stopped claiming to have all this alleged superior knowledge, nobody would ask you about it.

So again, if you have this education you speak of, how do you substantiate said education?

 

[SeventyOne]

Because you are the one who keeps talking about your superior education/knowledge/whatever. If you stopped claiming to have all this alleged superior knowledge, nobody would ask you about it.

So again, if you have this education you speak of, how do you substantiate said education?

You are back to your whining once again. I never said that. Time for you to go away. There is no having an actual conversation with you. I've been more than patient. Toodles.

 

[HitchSlap]

I'm not going to watch 5+ hours of flat earth crap... do you have a time stamp?

Here's one response by the guy in that clip:

Here's another by himself and someone else also featured in the film:

 

[pitabread]

You are back to your whining once again. I never said that. Time for you to go away. There is no having an actual conversation with you. I've been more than patient. Toodles.

Whatever excuse you need to avoid the question I guess...

Bye Felicia.

 

[SeventyOne]

I'm not going to watch 5+ hours of flat earth crap... do you have a time stamp?

It is basically the subject of all that time, so no.

 

[Justatruthseeker]

I don't think we have actually.

So let's talk about it: you're claiming you are educated on a subject. How do you substantiate that education?

Astronomers claim to be educated yet were wrong by a factor of 30 the amount of matter coming into our system. Every model they had of the suns heliosphere was falsified. So their claimed education did no more good than had you taken a guess at it....

 

[pitabread]

Astronomers claim to be educated yet were wrong by a factor of 30 the amount of matter coming into our system. Every model they had of the suns heliosphere was falsified. So their claimed education did no more good than had you taken a guess at it....

Not at all what I asked.

Try again, superstar.

 

[HitchSlap]

Astronomers claim to be educated yet were wrong by a factor of 30 the amount of matter coming into our system. Every model they had of the suns heliosphere was falsified. So their claimed education did no more good than had you taken a guess at it....

Maybe you should publish your findings in the Journal of Noonegivesapoop.

 

[Justatruthseeker]

Not at all what I asked.

Try again, superstar.

Sure it is, you just refuse to accept education does not mean always right.....

 

[pitabread]

Sure it is, you just refuse to accept education does not mean always right.....

Perhaps you should tell that to SeventyOne then...

 

[Justatruthseeker]

Maybe you should publish your findings in the Journal of Noonegivesapoop.

They already published there, then found all their models were wrong anyways, despite the approval of their peers.

But that’s the problem, you don’t care if they are wrong, just that they say what you want to hear.....

 

[Justatruthseeker]

Perhaps you should tell that to SeventyOne then...

Except i am right, as education does not always mean right.

Which is basically his argument that the experts aren’t always the experts...

 

[HitchSlap]

They already published there, then found all their models were wrong anyways, despite the approval of their peers.

But that’s the problem, you don’t care if they are wrong, just that they say what you want to hear.....

Ergo, goddidit?

Amiright?

 

[pitabread]

Except i am right, as education does not always mean right.

Which is basically his argument that the experts aren’t always the experts...

His argument is that he has educated himself on a topic. I asked how he substantiates that education. He then got all defensive instead of simply answering.

And then you jumped in with an off-topic deflection yourself. It seems like you guys can't answer the question I posed.

Now insofar as experts not being experts, it's funny how that is only ever trotted out when people have a view that dramatically contradicts what the experts claim.

 

[A_Thinker]

Build my own computer? Yup, I can do that.

You build with components ... provided by those with the necessary expertise ...

 

[A_Thinker]

True, but then like Dark Matter after over 15 null results they ignore the results and keep proclaiming its fact...... They got the testing down, but have a tendency to ignore results that don’t go in their favor.

Dark matter is a theory. Science has the capacity to change as evidence necessitates ...

 

[A_Thinker]

Well, we have, and even if we haven't, give me a good reason why I have to explain anything about myself to you.

Substantiating the source of information is one of the elements of determining the validity of a position.