Again, what does Space, NASA, Freemasonry, etc have to do with the shape of the Earth?
You have still yet to explain seasons or equinoxes, the "ship rising out of the water" phenomenon that you see when you're watching incoming ships at a port city, you've still yet to explain how Eratosthenes somehow calculated the Earth's size to within 16 percent (and perhaps up to 2 percent accurate).
The link you provided did give some insight: He could have been as much as 16% off, or as accurate as 2%. Still, 16% error is a pretty good guess for using a couple poles and some trigonometry. And that 16% error is with the continents of North and South America included which Eratosthenes didn't even know existed.
As far as how far away the Sun actually is, well. Even if it were up close, that still doesn't explain the Equator, the Northern&Southern Hemisphere Behavior, etc.
You've yet to even touch that point. Meanwhile, Eratosthenes's calculations using very primitive means, came to within 2-16% accuracy based on what we know based upon geography and measurements we've taken of the land masses and how far they are away from each other, ocean maps, etc. This is including the fact that Eratosthenes could not have known North&South America even existed.
Again, loads of evidence that says Round Earth is right, and.... almost zero to say that Flat Earth could even be possible let alone right.
Most of the phenomena that we observe today is impossible with the model you're trying to present.
And please stop bringing up Freemasonry, Government Conspiracies, NASA, etc. That has nothing to do with the subject whatsoever, as you can come up with a load of evidence for Round Earth just by standing on the ground (or flying in the air) in various places.
