It took a while to find this article. And you should know better. Without even seeing it you should have heard alarm bells ringing. I am betting that your creationist sources did not provide a link to the original article. That tells you that your sources probably lied through quote mining. You did not lie yourself, but you are a party to it since you passed it on.
https://www.nature.com/articles/352485a0.pdf
Though this was in Nature it is not a peer reviewed article. It is a book review of a creationist book that did not like the fact of evolution. The review points out the endless flaws in the book. The quote lifted from it is merely how the fact of evolution is extremely worrisome to some Christians that accept evolution. You appear to be trying to tell God how he had to get life to its current state. Does that not smack more than just a little of blasphemy on your part?