• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

AlexDTX

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 13, 2015
4,191
2,817
✟351,434.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
You might know of Catholic intellectual E Michael Jones? He's done some excellent work on the historical side imho, primarily focusing on Jewish influence. Video Library — Culture Wa

I have not heard of his work before, but I bookmarked it and will watch it later. I will give you my feed back afterwards. While I disagree with the Catholic system, there are many things I do commend. They have maintained a moral standard that had been consistent for 2,000 years. The other is that they excel in academic scholasticism. That scholasticism tends to make them more natural thinking instead of spiritual thinking, but they are very good with facts and history.
 
Upvote 0

Shrewd Manager

Through him, in all things, more than conquerors.
Site Supporter
Aug 16, 2019
4,167
4,081
Melbourne
✟364,409.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I have not heard of his work before, but I bookmarked it and will watch it later. I will give you my feed back afterwards. While I disagree with the Catholic system, there are many things I do commend. They have maintained a moral standard that had been consistent for 2,000 years. The other is that they excel in academic scholasticism. That scholasticism tends to make them more natural thinking instead of spiritual thinking, but they are very good with facts and history.

Agreed, right on point. Jones is Aristotelian but very diligent, he's been around and has a prolific output, improving with age as well imho. A bit of a maverick. Be interested in your thoughts. I'll likewise come back to you on the Singer book.
 
Upvote 0

AlexDTX

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 13, 2015
4,191
2,817
✟351,434.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Agreed, right on point. Jones is Aristotelian but very diligent, he's been around and has a prolific output, improving with age as well imho. A bit of a maverick. Be interested in your thoughts. I'll likewise come back to you on the Singer book.

I have listened to the first half and began the Q & A, but have to help my wife with her car. But I want to address some points while still fresh in my mind.

The keystone to his speech is his statement that we have 2 options for reasons: either we conform our desires to the Truth, or we try to conform the Truth to our desires.

That is a profound statement.

Later he followed up that statement with we can only apprehend Truth when we live the Truth.

I have walked with Christ for 30 years. Seeking and living the truth has caused me quite a bit of resistance from many people who call themselves Christians. I came to Christ before I was aware of the Truth movement. After Bush Jr invaded Iraq, that had nothing to do with Osama Bin Laden, and had not attacked the USA, I realized that the Republican party was no better than the Democratic party and began researching the truth. Becoming involved with the Truth movement also opened my eyes to the truth of organized religion. After 20 years of membership in different denominations, I sought fellowship in house churches.

Sadly, I came across the same problem in house churches where sheep try to control other sheep in the name of the Shepherd. In one fellowship I was told I had to qualify all my statements with "in my opinion". My response was that if I knew something that was true, I would not qualify my statement. And for those things I was uncertain about, I already used such an expression to let people know that I was uncertain. They kicked me out of the fellowship.

This discouraged me greatly, but the Lord kept singing a refrain from the Paul Simon song, The Boxer. "A man hears what he wants to hear, and disregards the rest". I realized this is the reality of all humanity.

Walking with Christ means walking in humility so one can be teachable and ready to repent when in error. Both statements by Dr. Jones have the same spirit behind them. He focuses on sexual sin because that seems to be the most catastrophic sin. As the Apostle Paul had said,

1Co_6:18 Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body.

so it is a powerful tool of Satan and his human minions. Dr. Jones followed up with his statement that "vice opens the door to control" and this is what the globalists want: total control of mankind. They know that the Church - not organized religion - but the body of Christ is the biggest road block to that control. This is why the Rockefellers infiltrated organized religion to undermine people's walk with Christ that would keep them free. How did they do that? Subtly, by encouraging believers in thinking grace removes necessity for obedience. Sloppy agape as it is called is why Christians divorce, commit adultery, fornicate, touch to porn and a myriad of other things that puts them back into bondage.

The truth is, Christ gives us grace to repent, not to sin. His grace is there to help us overcome sin and to walk in genuine freedom.

I was surprised in the first Q & A to hear that the Rockefellers also approached the Vatican to write the encyclical on contraception. Dr. Jones's sequence makes complete sense: contraception opened the door to fornication, fornication opened the door to adultery, sexual "freedom" opened the door to homosexuality and the continuing list of perversions.

While Rockefeller failed with the Vatican, he succeeded with Catholic academia, thus eroding Catholicism as well.

When I come back from taking care of my wife's car, I will listen to the rest of the Q & A and give you further feedback. Thanks for sharing the video.

One last point, tho. When I dove deeper into the Truth movement, it created great anger and bitterness in my heart to realize the deception and mind control the whole world has been subjected to. The anger and bitterness spilled over onto organized religion, which is why I stopped participating with them and sought alternatives.

Anger and bitterness is a defilement of heart that no Christian should allow to remain in their heart for long. I left politics until Trump came along, since I saw a new hope. Not that my hope is in Trump. My hope is in Christ using Trump just as He did with Cyrus to free Israel from the Babylonians.

Likewise, regarding organized religion, there is a place for it. It is still a place to meet with other believers and there are pulpits with speakers who genuinely are seeking the truth even though the system they use is the world's system imposed upon the body of Christ.

When you read "The Unholy Alliance" it is forewarn you of the world's influence, but do not allow bitterness or anger to come into your heart because of it. There is much to be gained from organized religion.

Post Script
Finished watching Q & A and saw the impact of the moral relativism on the students as they tried to "out smart" Dr. Jones. He finished with the reminder that truth and goodness are intrinsically linked. Another great point.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

HoneyBee

Prodigal Daughter
Site Supporter
Feb 19, 2017
610
1,222
West Coast
✟244,453.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
@LaBèlla I just happened to stumble across this thread today and, well... I'm currently going through my own journey when it comes to feminism as a Christian. There are some ideas that are compatible with Christianity, I believe, but others that aren't as much. In the end, I suppose it depends on which movement of feminism you are looking at. As I came to realize, there are quite a few out there.

I personally have started identifying as a feminist to reclaim the word and also because I believe that there are movements that I can work with for the most part, particularly pro-life feminism and radical feminism.

As a feminist who is mixing parts of both movements together into my own personal kind of feminism, my beliefs would be as follows:
  • I believe in standing and advocating for the rights of pregnant and parenting persons, and also advocating for things to make pregnancy and parenting less taxing and more possible for people to do.
  • I believe in fighting back against the abortion lobby as well. It lets irresponsible men off of the hook, kills unborn children, and breaks down society as a whole. There are at least 60 million people in America alone missing because of abortion. And then the replacement rate in the United States is so low that it's going to be a problem in the future. There is just so much happening as a result of abortion laws being shot down and the lobby expanding its reach.
  • I am also thinking that there is such a thing as patriarchal forces at play in society. Just look around. It's all around us in advertisements and even in some places of our government.
  • I believe we, as Christians, need to be more accepting of people who have same-sex attractions. We can't throw hate at same-sex attracted persons just because of who they are attracted to and then wonder why they don't want to go to church. We don't have to agree with them being in relationships, but we have to remember that they are still children of God, as we all are. To say otherwise would be disingenuous in my eyes.
  • Radical feminism takes a stand against pornography and prostitution, which I can fully get behind. We must stop allowing for the subjugation and objectification of women (men as well) and take a stand against these wicked industries.
  • Radical feminists are also vocal about the fact that you cannot change your sex, even if you believe yourself to be a woman and are actually a man, or vice versa. As such, they would be against men or "transgender women" entering women-only spaces. It's for our safety, in many cases, which makes sense.
  • Finally, I would like to take a stand with the radical feminists against the beauty industry. It is insidious because it gives us a false sense of what beauty is, makes us feel that we are not beautiful as we are, often leads to eating disorders, and causes many of us to buy products that we simply do not need in order to try to attain an unnatural standard of beauty. We are not dolls, we are human women, and God made us beautiful as we are. For companies to be manipulating us all for a profit is simply disgusting in my eyes. But, with that being said, if a woman freely chooses to wear make up or shave or anything like that, there's nothing wrong with that. I'm just against the manipulation of the beauty industry, which also leads to the over-sexualization of women and girls.
There are some things that some feminists stands for that I don't agree with, including hating all men just for being men, advocating for no abortion laws, and other things like that, but I think I can still call myself a feminist with all the things I listed above. It doesn't fit too neatly into one singular box, but that's why I built my own flexible box. I might be the only one in the box, but that's completely alright. I am allowed to be my own person with my own opinions and I don't need to rigidly label myself if I do not choose to do so.

And that's that on that! Thanks again for opening up this thread for discussion LaBella! It's always fun for me to be able to write out the things that I deeply believe in.
 
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
33,463
20,754
Orlando, Florida
✟1,511,965.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Before we passed the 19th Amendment, all we did was ride around on bicycles built for two and sip cherry phosphates. Now we've got AIDS, mass shootings and Miley Cyrus. I rest my case.

I hope you are being facetious. The "good ole days" had plenty of horrors.

My grandparents generation had lots of "broken homes", eg. divorce, lots of physical abuse. It was not talked about as openly as in the past few decades.
 
Upvote 0