- Jul 2, 2003
- 152,142
- 19,769
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Democrat
On msn, but the document is from the House Oversight committee led by the GOP
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
On msn, but the document is from the House Oversight committee led by the GOPJoe Biden Met Nearly Every Foreign Associate Funneling His Family Millions - United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability
United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountabilityoversight.house.gov
Yet, I have never seen the actual names of the individuals. Did see that Hunter talked to a certain company but nothing that shows Joe Biden actually talked business with Hunter's business partners in China.
This pdf document is about 229 pages long. After the initial statements from Hunter Biden in this interactive deposition to the committee, there are a lot of details in there which may, or may not, have previously been made available to the general public.
QFTI trust the House Committee investigating the Bidens. It included Freedom Caucus members who were so anxious to impeach him that if there had been the slightest proof they would have jumped on it.
But they couldn't find anything. They had to cancel the impeachment. A committee of rabid Biden haters had to cancel their impeachment because they had no evidence.
The photos were on MSN and the claims of bank records was from the House Oversight Committee.On msn, but the document is from the House Oversight committee led by the GOP
I have reason to distrust the Republicans on the oversight committee and the efforts of Comer in particular. This isn't Trump or Republican hate - or do just want to believe the worst of Biden because you hate him? The 'you just hate ____" is a cop-out argument.The photos were on MSN and the claims of bank records was from the House Oversight Committee.
Do you have a reason to doubt the Oversight Committee other than you not liking Republicans?
QFTWell, by the time it's gone through Bannon, Fox News, Newsmax, etc. it has been exaggerated and blown up beyond recognition and "others" may think it's the truth.
Regardless, the House Committee investigating Biden was burning the midnight oil trying to find a tiny bit of truth in those allegations and had to give up---a clear sign that others need to do the same.
Halliburton do good work on providing the chow there?I most definitely was, sir. In fact, I deployed twice to Iraq when I was still active duty in the Army. Hindsight is 20/20. Huge policy mistakes costed an untold amount of lives. Cheney and those in the Bush Administration should have been held accountable and responsible. Just like the Senators, Congressmen, and Congresswomen who voted in favor of the invasion of Iraq as well as the subsequent decades of involvement in Iraq should also be held accountable there.
The Republicans were in the majority, but without evidence they couldn't even garner party support.I disagree. I believe that the impeachment proceedings were canceled because those committee members understood knew that there was not enough votes in the House of Representatives for that impeachment to have a majority number of votes.
It wasn't an argument at all. I asked if you had a reason.I have reason to distrust the Republicans on the oversight committee and the efforts of Comer in particular. This isn't Trump or Republican hate - or do just want to believe the worst of Biden because you hate him? The 'you just hate ____" is a cop-out argument.
Wow, a few more incidents like that and he could be "almost" as corrupt as Ivanka and her father.
Get those imaginations working!
Trump leads in the lying. The Washington Post counted them during his term.It wasn't an argument at all. I asked if you had a reason.
Biden has a history of lying. Proven. Facts.
I don't find it unreasonable to think that he is lying again.
Thank you for the list. I remember perusing it before.Trump leads in the lying. The Washington Post counted them during his term.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...isleading-claims-total-30573-over-four-years/
It is even a topic on Wikipedia
Biden said "interact" - that he never interacted with them.It depends on how he meant 'met". Already covered that.
Where is proof that Biden had a business discussion with said "Chinese partners" of Hunter?
If there was any proof, why did the impeachment efforts by the House GOP flop?
Even House Republicans Seem to Know the Biden Impeachment Push Is a Flop
The GOP has failed to find incriminating evidence and their already-slim majority continues to shrink. “It is obviously time to move on,” the White House recently told Mike Johnson.www.vanityfair.com
House Republicans had been itching to start impeachment proceedings against Joe Biden from the moment he was inaugurated. But, as the idiom goes, be careful what you wish for: Six months after then-House Speaker Kevin McCarthy initiated an inquiry into the president, the stunt is now blowing up in their faces. They’ve failed to turn up evidence to incriminate Biden, and the flimsy pretense they based their effort on appears to have come from Russian intelligence. Their already-slim majority is narrowing further with the early retirement of disillusioned Representative Ken Buck. And this week's testimony from special counsel Robert Hur, who helped turbocharge questions about Biden’s age, likely failed to convince GOP members wary of impeachment to ultimately back the crusade.“It is obviously time to move on, Mr. Speaker,” White House counsel Edward N. Siskel wrote to Mike Johnson Friday. “This impeachment is over. There is too much important work to be done for the American people to continue wasting time on this charade.”....Just as the GOP’s endless Benghazi investigation wasn’t about accountability but dragging down Hillary Clinton’s campaign, the Biden impeachment has been about creating the impression that he is, in Trump’s words, “crooked.” They don’t need a formal vote to accomplish that—just a platform to spread their innuendo about Biden’s supposed corruption. But how much reach do those hazy insinuations have beyond their right-wing bubble, especially as their leader faces concrete charges in four separate criminal cases? “None of the evidence has demonstrated that the president did anything wrong,” Siskel wrote to Johnson, who insists that his investigators have uncovered “alarming” proof of Biden’s wrongdoing but that he has been too “busy” to decide what to do with it. “In fact, it has shown the opposite of what House Republicans have claimed.”
This makes me think of Lewis Carroll's Jabberwocky
Jabberwocky
’Twas brillig, and the slithy toves Did gyre and gimble in the wabe: All mimsy were the borogoves, And the mome raths outgrabe. And, as in uffish thought he stood, The Jabberwock, with eyes of flame, Came whiffling through the tulgey wood, And burbled as it came! ’Twas brillig, and the slithy toves…www.poetryfoundation.org ’Twas brillig, and the slithy tovesDid gyre and gimble in the wabe:All mimsy were the borogoves,And the mome raths outgrabe.“Beware the Jabberwock, my son!The jaws that bite, the claws that catch!Beware the Jubjub bird, and shunThe frumious Bandersnatch!”
House GOP dreams that Biden did the crimes they claim is all gibberish.
Proof that he never interacted with Hunter's business partners?They couldn't get the votes because they had no proof. Even Devon Archer let them down.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?