I never really thought on it much,as amphibians are prone to thinking about pond life.
I don’t agree with the federal view of condemnation.
The proponents will quote this..
Romans 5;18 Therefore, as one trespass led to condemnation for all men, so one act of righteousness leads to justification and life for all men.
And this..
Romans 5;19 For as by the one man's disobedience the many were made sinners, so by the one man's obedience the many will be made righteous.
Feds view Adam,who,as the head of the human race,stood for us,and we are accounted sinful,on the basis of his disobedience.Like he was the Ambassador,and we are bound because of his actions,and we were judged too.Adam’s sin was imputed to us.In the same way as Christ’s righteousness was imputed to us.They agree we inherited a sinful nature,but that is not what condemns us.
The tricky thing is ,yes,I agree with half of the verse (verses) posted.Righteousness is imputed by the act of Jesus.But was the act of Adam imputed to me? In the same way righteousness was,from the second Adam?
In other words,they say,I was born under condemnation,because of Adam,not necessarily,because of my own sin nature.Basically,,born guilty by judgment,a verdict.
Would that be fair?
I think what is needed is the explanation of ...”made sinners”.
Yes,by Adams act,I was made a sinner,which gave me a sin nature,which led to condemnation.And that explains the first half of the two posted verses.The”how”.
Thank you.
Ps,there is also the Augustinian (and others I suppose)view,that indicates we "were in Adam"..this passage,as an example.
Hebrews 7:9-10 One might even say that Levi himself, who receives tithes, paid tithes through Abraham, 10 for he was still in the loins of his ancestor when Melchizedek met him.
Thank you.
I don’t agree with the federal view of condemnation.
The proponents will quote this..
Romans 5;18 Therefore, as one trespass led to condemnation for all men, so one act of righteousness leads to justification and life for all men.
And this..
Romans 5;19 For as by the one man's disobedience the many were made sinners, so by the one man's obedience the many will be made righteous.
Feds view Adam,who,as the head of the human race,stood for us,and we are accounted sinful,on the basis of his disobedience.Like he was the Ambassador,and we are bound because of his actions,and we were judged too.Adam’s sin was imputed to us.In the same way as Christ’s righteousness was imputed to us.They agree we inherited a sinful nature,but that is not what condemns us.
The tricky thing is ,yes,I agree with half of the verse (verses) posted.Righteousness is imputed by the act of Jesus.But was the act of Adam imputed to me? In the same way righteousness was,from the second Adam?
In other words,they say,I was born under condemnation,because of Adam,not necessarily,because of my own sin nature.Basically,,born guilty by judgment,a verdict.
Would that be fair?
I think what is needed is the explanation of ...”made sinners”.
Yes,by Adams act,I was made a sinner,which gave me a sin nature,which led to condemnation.And that explains the first half of the two posted verses.The”how”.
Thank you.
Ps,there is also the Augustinian (and others I suppose)view,that indicates we "were in Adam"..this passage,as an example.
Hebrews 7:9-10 One might even say that Levi himself, who receives tithes, paid tithes through Abraham, 10 for he was still in the loins of his ancestor when Melchizedek met him.
Thank you.
Last edited: