Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
That is inconsistent with Hur’s testimony. He said he revealed classified information and “read classified information out loud” to him.I believe that Hur thinks Biden shared classified information with his ghostwriter, so no, he's not lying. He's just asserting something for which he has no proof.
A person saying "I just found this thing" does not constitute them reading it or showing it to anyone.
The audio recordings do not include Biden actually reading any classified information. Specifically, the classified information that Biden purportedly shared is his notes/diary entries pertaining to discussions in the Situation Room and other conversations that may have been classified. Biden claims that he skipped over anything he thought might be classified. Some of the audio recordings have been deleted (for reasons that Hur found satisfactory), but the transcripts do not contain any classified information, and neither do the books, so there is no evidence of any wrongdoing.
White House pushes back on depiction of ghostwriter in special counsel report
Robert Hur’s report discusses conversations that Biden had with Mark Zwonitzer, a writer and documentary filmmaker.www.nbcnews.com
How the ghostwriter of Biden's memoirs ended up in the center of a classified documents probe
President Joe Biden worked so closely with ghostwriter Mark Zwonitzer that he is accused of sharing government secrets with him.apnews.com
It’s “standard procedure” for ex-Presidents who’ve purloined papers that belong to the government, (and asked several times for, in writing, before making the unprecedented step of putting this standard to the “ex-president’s test”.Well that’s the dispute, isn’t it? His position is that same President, he is the one who decides who is authorized.
You can’t have it both ways; is unprecedented AND standard procedure.
My understanding is that Mar-A-Lago is a private club where the former President resides but that doesn’t make it a “residence”.Did the FBI raid Biden’s private resident?
They should bring Joe up on charges after he leaves office, for this “reading of classified” materials to a ghostwriter who didn’t hold security-clearance.Are they claiming that Hur lied under oath? And last time I checked audio recordings qualified as proof
Use deadly force.It’s “standard procedure” for ex-Presidents who’ve purloined papers that belong to the government, (and asked several times for, in writing, before making the unprecedented step of putting this standard to the “ex-president’s test”.
The question is: what should have the government done differently to get President Trump to relinquish the purloined papers?
Yeah, somewhere in the middle of a 3 hour diatribe he said a single sentence with to make your voices heard peacefully but with plenty of calls to fight like [heck] or lose your country on either side. That smacks of his disclaimer on his financial statements.
In one of his early rallies he said he would pay the legal fees of anyone who punched out a protester. Does that count?
“I don’t condone violence,” he said, “but this kid shouldn’t have had the finger up in the air, either.”
As I said, you can’t have it both ways; is unprecedented AND standard procedure. Claims of Trump wrong doing are false. If you cannot see the law fare tactic to interfere with the 2024 election, not all have eyes to see.It’s “standard procedure” for ex-Presidents who’ve
Yes. At what point would you recognize the government needs to be deregulated? What budget, debt, # of workers, pages of budget would cause a reasonable person to realize the largest institution in the history of mankind is too big to be effective in restraining itself strictly to its Constitutional purposes for existing?Should we “deregulate the government”?
Gee, won’t that be a fun ride!?
No. I'm a Constitutional apologist based on Conservative principles of the Declaration of Independence - limited government and Individual freedom. The departments are subject to the elected POTUS, not the other way around. This Deep State opposition is why they properly recognize the existential threat Trump poses and why his ascendency is revolutionary.Says the monarchy apologist.
No, he will be an old irrelevant man. They should let him retire in peace.They should bring Joe up on charges after he leaves office, for this “reading of classified” materials to a ghostwriter who didn’t hold security-clearance.
Department of Justice (DOJ) special counsel Robert Hur confirmed Tuesday President Joe Biden’s ghostwriter discarded audio recordings of conversations about the executive office’s military decisions.I believe that Hur thinks Biden shared classified information with his ghostwriter, so no, he's not lying. He's just asserting something for which he has no proof.
A person saying "I just found this thing" does not constitute them reading it or showing it to anyone.
The audio recordings do not include Biden actually reading any classified information. Specifically, the classified information that Biden purportedly shared is his notes/diary entries pertaining to discussions in the Situation Room and other conversations that may have been classified. Biden claims that he skipped over anything he thought might be classified. Some of the audio recordings have been deleted (for reasons that Hur found satisfactory), but the transcripts do not contain any classified information, and neither do the books, so there is no evidence of any wrongdoing.
White House pushes back on depiction of ghostwriter in special counsel report
Robert Hur’s report discusses conversations that Biden had with Mark Zwonitzer, a writer and documentary filmmaker.www.nbcnews.com
How the ghostwriter of Biden's memoirs ended up in the center of a classified documents probe
President Joe Biden worked so closely with ghostwriter Mark Zwonitzer that he is accused of sharing government secrets with him.apnews.com
This has already been pointed out, arguing this is completely misunderstanding what each refers to. Nobody is talking of the same thing when referring to unprecedented and standard procedure. Please stop making this false arguement. English isn't even my native language and I can understand what each point refers to.As I said, you can’t have it both ways; is unprecedented AND standard procedure. Claims of Trump wrong doing are false. If you cannot see the law fare tactic to interfere with the 2024 election, not all have eyes to see.
Based on what evidence, precisely? If he has any, he obviously hasn't shared it with anyone - the House Rs would be scrambling to impeach if they had proof of such a clear-cut crime.That is inconsistent with Hur’s testimony. He said he revealed classified information and “read classified information out loud” to him.
In which Biden claims he did not share any classified material, which is backed up by the transcripts, which were not destroyed.Department of Justice (DOJ) special counsel Robert Hur confirmed Tuesday President Joe Biden’s ghostwriter discarded audio recordings of conversations about the executive office’s military decisions.
Biden doesn’t know what he shared.Based on what evidence, precisely? If he has any, he obviously hasn't shared it with anyone - the House Rs would be scrambling to impeach if they had proof of such a clear-cut crime.
In which Biden claims he did not share any classified material, which is backed up by the transcripts, which were not destroyed.
The president does not have the "individual freedom" to decide what is or isn't classified, or who is authorized to see classified materials.No. I'm a Constitutional apologist based on Conservative principles of the Declaration of Independence - limited government and Individual freedom. The departments are subject to the elected POTUS, not the other way around.
And neither does Hur, as far as I can tell.Biden doesn’t know what he shared.
Read it and weep. Really, it wasn't that hard to find a transcript.Like I said burden of proof. People can say many things. A proper link will do or is that too much to ask?
So although he says he doesn't condone it, he'll pay the legal fees? There seems to be a bit of an internal contradiction there. Paraphrase: I'm not saying my violent supporters should punch the protesters, but if they do, I am looking into paying their legal fees. He says he is not condoning it in the same paragraph in which he condones it. Weasel words.You meant this I would assume. Didn't he said he doesn't condone it?
Trump says he may pay legal fees of supporter who sucker-punched protester at rally
Like telling the cops not to shield the suspects' heads when putting them in the car for arrest?I'm asking for a direct instruction that he said. Not comment on acts of others.
He does a lot of winking and nodding.I hope for an actual call to violence. Like what you would read about the Rwanda genocide "cut the tall trees"
I am pointing out the false argument. Big difference.Nobody is talking of the same thing when referring to unprecedented and standard procedure. Please stop making this false arguement.
There is no "President Trump" anymore. Donald Trump did not have the authority to keep those classified documents, not the authority to grant himself access.I am pointing out the false argument. Big difference.
President Trump has the authority not the Deep State.
They are attempting to do to him what they did to General Flynn, entrap him in a process crime with no underlying crime having been committed. Doubling down on this corruption of power by calling it "standard procedure" is the propaganda that I see through for what it is. And I will NOT adopt the language of my enemy.
We learned last week this abuse of power extended to the Deep State authorizing itself to use deadly force in execution of a warrant agains the President of the United States guarded by the Secret Service. Only a fool would hold themselves to the standard of the law those corrupted by power invent while exempting themselves.
The history of this is criminalizing political disputes. If you do not see this is maximizing violence, look again.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?