• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

"Fatal Flaw" in predestinary theory

Status
Not open for further replies.
R

Rightglory

Guest
Behe's Boy,

Why do you think there might be a contradiction between those two statments?
this particular verse is not stating anything about increasing it, but it is ONLY through It that we are being saved. The verse being I Pet 1:3-5.

Post #609
I understand her perfectly. The better translations from the Greek is "originator" and "perfector" of OUR FAITH. God gives us the faith thus it is ours. We use that faith, we increase that faith which is done by God giving us more grace, to enable us to continue, to mature that faith. He perfects it in us, as we desire to remain in Him. Nothing gets done unless man is in sync with God. God does not unilaterally save our souls. We are saved through OUR faith, by the power of God. I Pet 1:3-5.
 
Upvote 0
R

Rightglory

Guest
Jesusfreak5000,
Would "God's predestinating of certain men to be in Him" not be considered an event? Would "God's calling of certain men" not be an event?
However that is not what the whole context is saying. There are no individuals being predestinated to be beleivers. One must of necessity be a beleiver, thus become one of the elect, the chosen, and then those actions will be performed with the exclusion of calling. He calls all men to repentance not certain men.

God's foreordination cannot be overturned; it is an eternal decree.
this is true, but it is the actions that cannot be overturned. God decreed, forordained that THOSE IN CHRIST WILL BE ACTED UPON. But there is nothing there about individuals or an event being forordained.
In Eph 1:3 it is even more clearly stated. Vs 3 says those IN Him were chosen. It does not say that they were chosen to be IN HIm. One is already IN Him which makes that person of the chosen. They are members of His Body. The ONLY way to enter into Christ is by faith. There is no other avenue in Scripture that states it differently. That is why it is called justification by faith.
Verse 5 again uses the word predestined but what is being predestined is not believers but the fact that they as believers would be adopted as sons. But again, a believer can disinherit that sonship. ONe is not being saved as an unbeliever. When we lose faith, we have also lost the justification, the privilege to be IN Christ. Confession reconciles us back to God.

Huh? Tell me, those who "obey and are faithful" are descriptions of what? Believers.
but it is not the believers who are being predestinated, It is the action upon those who are believers already.
A poor analogy to say the least, but if you had an eternal car wash and you entered it, and the predestination is that being IN the carwash you will be washed in a ever ongoing, never ending action upon any car in that track. But you must remain in order to be continually washed, If you leave, the predestination of the wash goes on for others that are still on the track. That continual washing was forordained at the startup of that wash. But nothing about the car being forordained to go to the terminal end. Same for beleivers. We enter into Christ freely, we can leave freely and leave behind the synergistic work of God working upon us, to conform us, to make us holy, to make us blameless.

God does not compel man to remain faithful. See Adam for your first example. If Christ holds you to himself and you are not free to leave, then God already failed with Adam.

1Jo 2:3 By this we know that we have come to know Him, if we keep His commandments.
1Jo 2:4 The one who says, "I have come to know Him," and does not keep His commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him;
1Jo 2:5 but whoever keeps His word, in him the love of God has truly been perfected. By this we know that we are in Him:

How synergistic can one get with these texts. There is a lot of action on the part of man in these verses. It is speaking to believers. So if a believer does not keep His commandments he has become a liar and the Truth is not in Him. If he remains in Him he will be perfected. There you have those predestined actions being performed, IF a believer desires to obey, to keep his word, his committment, his promise upon entering by faith, Justification.

Therefore, anyone who is "In Christ" is obedient. That is how you know you are a true believer; you keep His word. If you do not keep His word, you are not a believer, and never were.
Correct, but that is also how we know we are no longer in Christ when we become disobedient, Especially when we willingly disobey and then do not confess those sins to be reconciled back to God. It never says you never were. Just look around, friend. How many believers can you see being disobedient, some for quite a long time. Some holding hate to another brother for example. If we hate our brother, we CANNOT LOVE GOD. Your neighbor is the second most important person in the trinitarian communal understanding of the Great Commandment. Love God, Love your fellow man, (especially your enemies) as much as you love yourself. You remove any one of those legs, you are no longer in Christ.

1. One who is in Christ obeys His word.
2. One who is not in Christ does not obey His word.
Those would be accurate descriptions as per 1 John 2. Now, if these are what categorize each of the distinct individuals (those in Christ vs. those not in Christ), then how can they deviate from their course of action? Surely, the inverse is true:

But that is not even close to what John is even saying. He is speaking OF believers only. It would be absolutely absurd to even make these statments if a believer actually could not hate his brother. If he could not murder his brother, or commit all the other sins. Greed, avarice, lust, envy. I would like to see this perfect believer. Especially in America.


1. One who is in Christ cannot (continually, 1 Jn 5:18) disobey His word.
2. One who is not in Christ cannot obey His word (Rom. 3:12).
Now that word "continually" changes the whole complexion. All it proves is that the believer is a liar. Repentance of those sins, and a repentance, a discontinuation of them is necessary to be reconciled back to God.
I would not be so quick to say that those in Christ cannot keep His commandments, but they are minus the faith. This is why faith and works in the NT go hand in hand. You cannot have one without the other.

Given that all of this is true, then necessarily, one who is a believer simply cannot and will not "abandon" Christ. Their character as a believer dictates this.
Right, and it contradicts most of NT scripture. Which is why it cannot be true. Luke point blank states a beleiver will be consigned with the unbelievers. Unless you think unbelievers are being saved, I would say that this person is eternally separated from Christ.

Luke 12:46,47, The master of that servant will come on a day when he is not looking for him, and at an hour when he is not aware, and will cut him in two and appoint him his portion with the unbelievers. And that servant who knew his master's will and did not prepare himself or do according to his will, shall be beaten with many stripes.

1Jo 2:19 They went out from us, but they were not {really} of us; for if they had been of us, they would have remained with us; but {they went out,} so that it would be shown that they all are not of us.

But this speaks directly opposed to your view. These are people who were believers but are leaving and making it quite manifest that they are. You cannot leave anything unless you were a part of it. These are not unbelievers leaving the fold of unbelievers. They are those hidden tares that the parable of the sower also mentions. We are to leave them alone. Ripping them out, might cause others to leave. We should not contribute to anothers condemnation. So leave them be, they also might repent before it is to late. This is the same as the 10 Virgins who did not come prepared. There is nothing in scripture anywhere that upholds the view that a believer is cast in stone as per salvation of his soul on a one-time mental ascent of faith. It is a life journey. It is a life of being faithful.

If one claims to be in Christ, but then shows signs that He is not, then He never was:
LIke if I was a baseball player and wore a uniform, but now retired I don't wear the uniform therefore it means I never was a baseball player. How illogical is that? Because you fell from the tree, and now are lying on the ground, does not mean you were never in the tree.

Not true. Man has all the free will in the world, that is, he has free will as far as his volition can take him. The question is, can man's volition bring him to place true saving faith in the work of Christ? Paul seems to say no:
Where does Paul say that? Paul even says all men have been given sufficient knowledge of God, to know God and be held accountable for that knowledge. Rom 1:18-24. No man will be able to give an excuse that he did not have the necessary grace, means to be saved. Every man will give an account in the measure of Grace he was given at the judgement.

You have some being held by God, all others are never saved, redeemed in order to believe. They missed the predestination to be believers. Who is being judged for what? Surely not man. You have actually removed the Image of God in man, removed his rational soul which makes him that moral agent.

Rom 3:11 THERE IS NONE WHO UNDERSTANDS, THERE IS NONE WHO SEEKS FOR GOD;
Now is "NONE" really "NONE", or is it just "sort of none". Mostly none, except a few? According to you, Paul is writing needlessly here because it isn't really true.
Did you ever check to see where those quotes are being taken from. The subject generally of all them are describing those that have turned away from God, fools who have said: Obviously, if you turn away from God, you cannot possibly be seeking Him. Read Ps 14, then read Ps 15. It is just the opposite. David is speaking of those righteous souls to sought after God. It is actually called the Song of the Righteous.

The reason Paul employs the verse in Romans is to make a strong hyperbole to the Jews. The Judiaziers who Paul is having a hypothetical discourse here, thought that they were the privileged people because of blood lines to Abraham. Paul quickly dispels that but they continue to press Paul regarding the hated gentiles. Paul then uses this Ps to say that all men are as bad as you think the gentiles are, meaning even you (Isrealites).
God calls all men to repentance. man has always sought after God, he is by nature, because of the Divine Image of God in man. But man in his fallen state more often perverted that seeking. But many men found God and God recognized them in Scripture. Abel, Enoch, Noah, Abraham, Rahab and many more. All were accounted righteous in God's sight.

And your are right, it is not true when taken in the context of the source and the purpose Paul is using them, then other scripture showing the calling of God. The work of the Holy Spirit upon all flesh, to convict men of their sin and need for Christ. God loves mankind, in fact, He loved this world, so much that He gave His only Son to redeem this world, so that WHOSOEVER BELIEVES. shall not perish. Nothing about only some believing or even being predestinated.

You mean "your church" (small "c").
No, actually the Church founded by Christ. The one He is preserving, the Gospel that He gave to that starting Church to disseminate over the world. It is still alive today and still proclaiming that same Gospel, unchanged. Truly an authentic witness of the work of the Holy Spirit. Can you show it is not?

Tell me, did not your own St. Augustine teach predestination?

Unfortunately for you it was never recognized as a true teaching of the Church. It was introduced 400 years after the Gospel was given. Even the RC does not recognize him in that regard. But he is still often called the Father of the Roman Catholic Church. Much of RC doctrine is also based on other Augustine teachings.

But the Church has given you Arius, Origen, Montanus, Apollinarius, Nestorius, Pelagius, many more individuals and several other false teachings. These were all believers, most were even bishops but all departed the Truth. Some repented, recanted but nevertheless for a time they too were not IN Christ.

So don't try to wave history around,
Maybe you aught to study history with much more care than you exhibit here. It matters not what man does, teaches or practices. It is what the Church believes, practices and corrects. Christ is Head of that Church, It is HIS Body, no less. Do you really believe Christ is a false teacher? Do you not believe that the Holy Spirit can actually preserve the Gospel once given? That ONE faith, of ONE Lord, ONE baptism, not many and asundry versions of same. Show that the Church from the Apostles to the present has ever changed that Gospel that was given in the beginning. I challenge you to try.

saying that because your church may have been mislead for 1700 years makes it impossible for me to be right.
'Well, so far you have not even begun to show it has been mislead. If you do succeed, we can all forget debating any theology because it would mean Christ cannot keep a promise. If He failed on one, what assurances do you have that He might fail on any other promises? The Holy Spirit is real. How can you account that the Gospel has not been changed, yet it is ironic that protestant claim they are led by the same Holy Spirit and arrive at a thousand different versions of a Book that does not contain the whole Gospel.

Holy Tradition, the first 35 to 40 years when nothing was written cannot be separated from the portion that was written. It is why you cannot make sense out of most of it. In most cases you reject the foundation from which the written text is derived from.

That is the weakest argument I have heard from you, and I hope that you cease from using it because it makes you look quite misinformed.
It is the ONLY valid argument that exists. Without the ONCE given Gospel, preseved by the Holy Spirit in His Body, we have nothing. On the other hand I am glad to be accounted with all the saints, the martyrs of the past who actually died for that Truth. The Truth was much more valuable than life itself.

Can you give any credible evidence to your assertion?

Ahhhh.... history. If you wish to talk about history, as if whoever has the oldest form of Christianity is the true church, then you can throw me out! lol.
Not just any form, the Original Gospel as it was given.
How can you give any evidence of being correct when it is based on your opinion, your own intellect. What is absurd is to say that the Holy Spirit is the author of all this confusion, ever growing plualism and diversity. Yet it says quite clearly that Christ and the Gospel He gave is Truth. He is Truth. He entrusted very specific authority to His Church. The individuals entrusted, specifically the bishops are going to be required to give an accounting of that trust and authority. False teaching and division, schism is serious sin and scripture is quite condemnatory regarding it.
 
Upvote 0
R

Rightglory

Guest
nobdysfool,

Touchy, aren't you?
Who here is claiming "infallibility"? Is it not you, hiding behind the "tradition" of your denomination? Lecturing us on how we do not have those traditions to fall back on when scripture contradicts what we want to believe? Is it not you who claims that scripture is not enough, not authoritative enough, that you must add to it the traditions of men?
I have never made such statments. They are all your complete misunderstanding of Scripture and what I have stated.
It is Christ's Gospel given ONCE. All Truth was given to the early Church, the Apostles. It is the Church founded by Christ that is infallible, Christ is that Head of that Church, He gave specific authority to that Church. The Gospel is the HOLY Tradition of which Paul speaks to Timothy. It is not simple tradition which the Church also has.
Could you enlighten me as to which men added to that Gospel? Might they be Luther, Calvin, Zwingli, even the Pope, et al.
On the other hand I don't see any evidence put forth by you to dispel that understanding. Do you have any credible evidence to show the Apostles taught predestination of persons to be believers and that the Church has always believed in this understanding?

I also have not seen any evidence that the Scriptures alone is authoritative.
All Sola Scripture has produced is an ameba like growth of division, confusion, pluralism and individual faith. Nothing of a universal Gospel. Which gospel is being preserved?
I've watched you try to dominate this thread, and cover for Ben. You're nearly holding a monologue in this thread as it is. Apparently you have some silly idea that you might convert one of us to Eastern Orthodoxy.
I didn't realize I was covering for Ben. On the most relevant of doctrine in this thread, He is also far from the Gospel once given.
If the Holy Spirit so moves someone, then all the better. But do you really think that a missionary goes forth with the idea that HE will convert anyone? All we are commanded is to teach the Gospel as it was given. The Holy Spirit does the work.
Amazing that a monergist thinks that his synergistic work could amount to anything.
 
Upvote 0
R

Rightglory

Guest
Jesusfreak5000,
This is your own opinion popping in here, that the word righteous means "to put into a correct relationship". That is not what it means. That may be an aspect of it, but as you say, it is purely judicial. To be deemed righteous is to be judged. While that obviously effects the relationship between me and God, that isn't the meaning of the term. Further, the greek term "d??a??s???", carries judicial connotations with it, and by the context of its use in Romans, refers to a judicial standing before God, not a relational standing.
The problem is that St. Paul is talking about salvation NOT being by Law. Righteousness is not by Law. in Rom 3:26 for example.
The question is that... IF salvation is not by Law then why is OUR salvation dependent on the idea that Christ KEPT THE LAW PERFECTLY FOR US and because of this perfection was the perfect "law required sacrifice that God demands to appease His wrath"? It seems that protestants are talking out of both sides of their mouths on this issue. St. Paul's statement is that the Law and Prophets WITNESSED to the righteousness of God but were not REQUIREMENTS for God to be righteous. If OUR righteousness is not by Law, then why would Christ's be? If OUR righteousness was ALWAYS by faith (see Romans 4) then why would Christ's be? If the Law was not intended to be a means of salvation (see Romans 7) then why would Christ's be dependent on it in order for Him to be the perfect sacrifice before God?
Jerome needed to use the Latin words "justify," "justified," and "justification" because Latin has no word for the ordinary meaning of the Greek words instead. Wherever the adjective dikaios, the verb dikaioo, and the noun dikaiosune occur the translation should use "righteous," "make righteous," and "righteousness." The meaning of those words should be derived from the Hebrew idea of a righteous person (tzaddiq) which never has the forensic meaning of being acquitted in a law court. The good news is that the Holy Spirit can perfect us in love, and so make us righteous in the Old Testament sense.

BUT.... let's back up now. Instead of translating "dikaiao" as "just" with all the forensic baggage attached to that term, lets translate it "righteous" and use it in the Hebrew and Greek sense of "to make things rightly related". God is "righteous" because in Him all things are "rightly related". In Him all things move and have their being, all things are in Him, by Him, for Him, unto Him and in Him all things hold together (Col. 1:16-17, etc). Now the fall, we need to introduce unrighteousness into the good, righteous creation. Sin and death make it not rightly related. All things become unrighteous before and apart from the law. (See Romans 5). So what does God do?
He exercises His righteousness by assuming into Himself in Christ the "unrighteousness" of creation. He redeems, reconciles makes righteous, makes everything acceptable to HIM by His participation through love and Mercy. This is what Col 1`:15-20 and II Cor 5:18-20 are saying. Now, He is both "righteous", as He always was as witnessed by the Law and Prophets, AND the one who made all acceptable, all reconciled, (justifier) of the one who has faith in Christ who has become the second Adam and renewed and "made right again" the whole creation for us to participate in once again APART FROM LAW.
So the point then of Romans 4 is not accounting and lawkeepping, but faith in the "righteousness of God". God "forgave" sin apart from law! That means that GOD DOES NOT HAVE TO PUNISH SOMEONE LEGALLY IN ORDER TO FORGIVE!!! Righteousness IS APART FROM LAW! Forgiveness comes from the very heart of God, out of His love and mercy,(Rom 112:32) NOT from His wrath taken out on an innocent One so He can be appeased toward the sinner. THAT IS OF LAW! We humanly forgive out of sheer love for our beloved ones, because of our RELATIONSHIP with those we love. Is God less than human? We don't take our wrath out on an innocent when someone begs our forgiveness before we can forgive. Romans 4 is an appeal for us to depend on God who is the ONE WHO MADE ALL THINGS RIGHTEOUS of all fallen creation, even sinners. St. Paul is calling the Jew in Romans 4 to faith, a RELATIONSHIP with God not dependent on rule keeping and ritual. He is NOT making a case for "God punished His Son instead of you, so now He is no longer the God of the Law but the God of grace". The MAKING RIGHT of the sinful human being the "making right" of the relationship of the fallen with the Eternal God has always been by grace and mercy, apart from Law, and in Christ who IS the righteousness of God for us because it is in His incarnation that all things have been rightly related back to God.
Thus we have NEVER had a legal, forensic, judicial standing but ONLY a relational one. It is most unfortunate that Latin does not have a one-on-one word for either the Hebrew or the Greek. It is also why texts as Rom 5:18-19 are misunderstood by most protestants as well.

It does very little?!?!?
I don't know about you, but being declared as "not guilty" of the law because of Christ's blood does "very much".
Shame on you for such a rotten statement.
Really, do you really believe that If court declares a man NOT Guilty, though he is actually guilty, immediately changes that man's heart. That a simple declaration produces repentance, sorrow for sin? You don't need look very far in the news lately to see the reality of such a declaration.
God is not interested in covering up you sin, simply declaring you not guilty. He is interested in repentance. Sin is forgiven upon sincere repentance. This is why repentance is so necessary in the life of a Christian. We remain reconciled to God. Sin separates man from God and God does not just cover them up and then you can go on sinning because he has on a one shot declaration made all you sin irrelevant to your soul, your character, your essence as a human being who is being perfected, becoming more and more righteous as we sin less and less. We curb our passions. We train to overcome sin. We do not sin blindly, then just assume that Christ got them covered so that we can continue to sin. We don't really need to repent, to confess them. As someone, maybe you, stated, to assuage our consciences.
But I guess it all depends on how you see your relationship with Christ and what God wants to accomplish in that relationship with man. Looking at the world, especially in the US it seems most take your view. Sin is rationalized out of existance to a larger extent, then those very obvious ones, they have the concept that they are already forgiven from the Cross.
You regard the blood of Christ very lowly, almost non existent.
simpy amazing.
I stand before God today, clothed in the righteousness of Christ, with all my sin already having been nailed to the cross. This is the infinitude and power of Christ's totally sufficient sacrifice.
Yes, but it does not come close to what you think this means. If you carry this to the extent you have here then you have Universalism. I don't think you believe that, but then I have been wrong on that before.
I have no respect for your view of scripture; you regard Christ's sacrifice as pointless. Your salvation is built on works and deeds, constantly scrambling to stay in Christ, to do enough of the good things, to stay away from the bad things.
Of course that is based on your complete misunderstanding of that sacrifice. You would have God simply cover your sin and permit you to go on sinning without a change of heart. It is like someone described in in Luther's time about the same issue, paraphasing, like snow covering dung. Looks good on the outside, but wretched on the inside.
I guess this is why sin is taken so lightly by most. When almost 92% of American believe in God it is not a very good indictment. When Christians can support and promote abortion and reconcile it as the freedom of the individual over her own body. Really.
When a large number of these people of which almost 75% are affliated with some church body, yet the concept of abortion or even worse the searching out of malformed fetus to destroy them. In the name of freedom we have reintroduced in America the concept of purification of the species what American condemned the Nazi's of doing just 60 years ago. Just amazing, such rationalizating of sin. You can continue to think that this form of faith is what Christ gave in His Gospel, but I don't see it anywhere.
Divorce, living arrangements, condoning of all kinds of sexual immoralty has the same percentage of occurance in American Churches as in the world of those not attending regularly. Any wonder that those who see any kind of religion as unnecessary since it makes little difference in society. Today American faiths all seem ot be conforming to society instead of the other way around. Might it not be that most think as you do, sin is not relevant, nor is our behavior, since we have been forgiven all sins in one declaration of "not guilty" as long as one believes. Nothing we do after that believe changes that verdict.
The plurality and choice of religions within the so-called christian melieu also makes one wonder what is the purpose. One can believe whatever one desires, each is valid in its own right.
That is only a beginning of all the pathogies and that government can solve all of these issue with money and information. All the while ignoring that it is all caused by sin. People look quicker for a political solution,thus making the government the savior of these social maladies.
I think the evidence is quite clear on your view.

You are living by the law. Christ abolished that law; now we live by grace.
This is really the most telling statment of all. Have you not read that He fullfilled the law but also established the law. Rom 3:21.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Jesusfreak5000,

that is a purely western notion. It is the result of Anselm's notion of satisfaction theory.
Man is never declared not guilty permanently.
Sure they are only through the cross. For we have no righteousness of our own. We are imputed with Christs righteousness.
When Jesus said it is finished He meant what He said. We as believers believe on Him and declare His death until He comes again.


If you wish to use the term as a legal notion, that when we confess our sins, Christ forgives us of those sins, it is a judicial act. But the word, righteous means to be put into a correct relationship. But the problem with man is that we keep on sinning.

This is why Christ had to come to save us from our sin.
To pay the ransom for our sin.
He settled the believers debt once for all time.
He became sin so that we would become the righteousness of Him not of our own rigteousness. He causes us to walk in His way. He puts His Spirit in us.



Declaring us "not guilty" does very little. But forgiving those sins and then our commitment to repent which means to work to do better, sin less is what we are commanded to do.

God not only forgives the believer of sin He also cleanses from all unrighteousness.
The more we hide Gods word in our heart the less we sin. For there is no temptation that He will not leave us a way out.


As believers we are not imputed anything. As I stated, unless you believe that a believer is not actually in Christ. It is an ontological, organic existance we share with Christ. Again, a contradiction from scripture which clearly says a believer is IN Christ. And also the Holy Spirit is indwelt within each believer.

The Hope of Glory is Christ in us. For with Christ in us He is made strong in our weakness.


Secondly, we are as righteous as we are not sinning or as we do righteousness. I John 3:7;
Also, justification has nothing to do with spiritual maturity.

Justification has every thing to do with our salvation. :) For we are justified not by our works but the cross of Christ and Gods gift of salvation to those whom He has called and chosen.




It is simply to be made right with God and because we have confessed and repented, that we are justified by our faith.
What have you confessed? So men justifies themselves?

Rom 4:3 For what does the Scripture say? "ABRAHAM BELIEVED GOD, AND IT WAS CREDITED TO HIM AS RIGHTEOUSNESS."
Rom 4:4 Now to the one who works, his wage is not credited as a favor, but as what is due.
Rom 4:5 But to the one who does not work, but believes in Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is credited as righteousness,
Rom 4:6 just as David also speaks of the blessing on the man to whom God credits righteousness apart from works:
Rom 4:7 "BLESSED ARE THOSE WHOSE LAWLESS DEEDS HAVE BEEN FORGIVEN, AND WHOSE SINS HAVE BEEN COVERED.
Rom 4:8 "BLESSED IS THE MAN WHOSE SIN THE LORD WILL NOT TAKE INTO ACCOUNT."


Each time we confess our sins, we are being reconciled to God. Sin separates man from God. It is why Christ atoned for our sins, so that they could be forgiven. But, once again, no sin is ever forgiven unless it is given up by confession. God does not just arbitrarily, unilaterally forgive sins. If He did, why do we need to seek forgiveness of our sin. Is He not really able to do as you think? It is the sanctification by which we are actually saved. It is through our faith, the continuation of our faith, the faithfulness of our faith by which we are being saved.
Which is the salvation of ones soul. No sanctification or when we lose faith, the sanctification stops also. God does not continue to work with man when man does not want to work with God. That is the whole point of being free, of choice, of man being a rational soul with a responsibility for his actions. God is not responsible for what we do. A believer can leave the fold at any time. There is nothing in the world that holds Him In Christ except His one desire and choice. There would be no need for a judgement if it were not so. Why would God judge man if God is the one responsible for his actions?
great protestant theology but not scriptural in the least. If you are not practically IN Christ you have no position in Christ. You cannot be both IN and OUT of Christ at the same time. Give a text that states this unusual phenonomon?


Positionally, we are like Christ. Practically, we are not.
Show me where Jesus tells us that His sheep can leave at any time?
 
Upvote 0

Charis kai Dunamis

χάρις καὶ δύναμις
Dec 4, 2006
3,766
260
Chicago, Illinois
✟20,154.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Jesusfreak5000,
This is really the most telling statment of all. Have you not read that He fullfilled the law but also established the law. Rom 3:21.

Rom 3:24 being justified as a gift by His grace through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus;

Like I said, you know nothing of grace.
 
Upvote 0
R

Rightglory

Guest
Mamaz,
My statment:....that is a purely western notion. It is the result of Anselm's notion of satisfaction theory.
Man is never declared not guilty permanently.
Your response:....
Sure they are only through the cross. For we have no righteousness of our own. We are imputed with Christs righteousness.
When Jesus said it is finished He meant what He said. We as believers believe on Him and declare His death until He comes again.
But every single living soul was imputed the Righteousness you are speaking about. That, "to be made acceptable, made right is giving all men life, and atoning for the sin of the world. Rom 5:18-19. Rom 11:32, I Cor 15:22 all spell this out quite clearly.
If this is actually what you want to believe, but as per scripture this would make it supremely Universalism. Even more so that the real Universalist explain it. They at least believe in a hell, whereas you bypassed that alltogether.
When Jesus said it is finished He meant what He said. We as believers believe on Him and declare His death until He comes again.
But this is the faith part, accepting, believing that He did in fact give us this Great Gift of Mercy. But it becomes quite hollow when your theological explanation denies that He ever was on a Cross. He didn't accomplish what Scripture says He actually did.
This is why Christ had to come to save us from our sin.
To pay the ransom for our sin.
He settled the believers debt once for all time.
He became sin so that we would become the righteousness of Him not of our own rigteousness. He causes us to walk in His way. He puts His Spirit in us.
But once again, this is ONLY applicable to all men. It does not single out believers in the least. He died for the sin of sinners. He is the Savior of the World, He propitiated the sin of the world. No place does it ever state that He did His work for but a few select creatures, called human beings who all bear His Image. He created ALL for the same reason. He desires that all might believe IN HIm, but in order for that to happen, man must have life, God cannot have an eternal relationship with a human being who just simply died and return to dust.
God not only forgives the believer of sin He also cleanses from all unrighteousness.
The more we hide Gods word in our heart the less we sin. For there is no temptation that He will not leave us a way out.
Yes, he does, EACH time we confess our sins. Then we become unrighteous again when we sin. We constantly need to confess our sins and strive to sin less. What you say of the believer is correct, but those that are with HIm can also leave Him. Our relationship is not set in stone in this life. We are actually under a test, the same kind of test Adam was given. A commandment to obey.

My statement:...As believers we are not imputed anything. As I stated, unless you believe that a believer is not actually in Christ. It is an ontological, organic existance we share with Christ. Again, a contradiction from scripture which clearly says a believer is IN Christ. And also the Holy Spirit is indwelt within each believer.
Your response:....
The Hope of Glory is Christ in us. For with Christ in us He is made strong in our weakness.
But is does not answer the statement I made. It confirms your contradiction.
Justification has every thing to do with our salvation. For we are justified not by our works but the cross of Christ and Gods gift of salvation to those whom He has called and chosen.
The justification you are speaking about is the one that Christ did on the Cross. It is the justification of all men, all men given life through His Resurrection and the propitiation of sin. It is why man cannot save himself, and surely no works can give life or atone for sin. He gave that Gift to the world, every human being recieved that Gift. It brings the world, mankind, right back to the prefall state of God being able to be in union and communion with man eternally. Just as He created it to be.
It is simply to be made right with God and because we have confessed and repented, that we are justified by our faith.
What have you confessed? So men justifies themselves?
Rom 4:3 For what does the Scripture say? "ABRAHAM BELIEVED GOD, AND IT WAS CREDITED TO HIM AS RIGHTEOUSNESS."
Rom 4:4 Now to the one who works, his wage is not credited as a favor, but as what is due.
Rom 4:5 But to the one who does not work, but believes in Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is credited as righteousness,
Rom 4:6 just as David also speaks of the blessing on the man to whom God credits righteousness apart from works:
Rom 4:7 "BLESSED ARE THOSE WHOSE LAWLESS DEEDS HAVE BEEN FORGIVEN, AND WHOSE SINS HAVE BEEN COVERED.
Rom 4:8 "BLESSED IS THE MAN WHOSE SIN THE LORD WILL NOT TAKE INTO ACCOUNT."
One must confess ones sins in order for all the above texts to have any validity. They are all by faith. Faith requires to be valid, forgiveness of sins. It is probably the very first act of obedience and give evidence that you take faith in Christ seriously. Without repentance, you faith is null and void, meaningless. It is why it is called justification by faith.
Show me where Jesus tells us that His sheep can leave at any time?
Adam was the first. Then we have a very large portion of the new testament that speaks almost monotonously of this aspect. But here is ONLY one that sinks any and all thought that a believer cannot leave the fold.
Luke 12:46,47, The master of that servant will come on a day when he is not looking for him, and at an hour when he is not aware, and will cut him in two and appoint him his portion with the unbelievers. And that servant who knew his master's will and did not prepare himself or do according to his will, shall be beaten with many stripes.
This is a very clear example of a believer who failed to remain faithful as will be appointed with the unbelievers. Unless you also think unbelievers are being saved, this former saved person is NO longer in Christ. He did not endure, did not remain faith. Lose faith, lose the salvation of ones soul. Sin has overtaken this individual.
 
Upvote 0

Charis kai Dunamis

χάρις καὶ δύναμις
Dec 4, 2006
3,766
260
Chicago, Illinois
✟20,154.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Mamaz,
But every single living soul was imputed the Righteousness you are speaking about. That, "to be made acceptable, made right is giving all men life, and atoning for the sin of the world. Rom 5:18-19. Rom 11:32, I Cor 15:22 all spell this out quite clearly.

Every single soul in Christ is imputed righteousness, just as every single soul in Adam is imputed sin. That is the parallel in Romans 5, not that every single man, whether in Christ or not, is imputed righteousness just as all men are imputed sin. You must be in Christ to have that imputation. You seem to be missing that.

Rom 5:18 Therefore as by the offence of one [judgment came] upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one [the free gift came] upon all men unto justification of life.

This verse is in reference to those in Adam vs. those is Christ. It cannot be referring to all men, as 5:1 is the qualifier:

Rom 5:1 Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ:

All men have not been justified by faith. Verse 18 is referring to all of those who are justified by faith. Those are the ones who receive the "justification of life".

Your passage in 1 Cor agrees with this:

1Cr 15:22 For as in Adam all die, so also in Christ all will be made alive.

All who are in Adam die; All who are in Christ will be made alive. However, all are not in Christ, therefore, all are not imputed His righteousness.
 
Upvote 0

nobdysfool

The original! Accept no substitutes!
Feb 23, 2003
15,018
1,006
Home, except when I'm not....
✟21,146.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Constitution
Every single soul in Christ is imputed righteousness, just as every single soul in Adam is imputed sin. That is the parallel in Romans 5, not that every single man, whether in Christ or not, is imputed righteousness just as all men are imputed sin. You must be in Christ to have that imputation. You seem to be missing that.

Rom 5:18 Therefore as by the offence of one [judgment came] upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one [the free gift came] upon all men unto justification of life.

This verse is in reference to those in Adam vs. those is Christ. It cannot be referring to all men, as 5:1 is the qualifier:

Rom 5:1 Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ:

All men have not been justified by faith. Verse 18 is referring to all of those who are justified by faith. Those are the ones who receive the "justification of life".

Your passage in 1 Cor agrees with this:

1Cr 15:22 For as in Adam all die, so also in Christ all will be made alive.

All who are in Adam die; All who are in Christ will be made alive. However, all are not in Christ, therefore, all are not imputed His righteousness.

Absolutely, positively, 100% true. That is exactly the crux of the difference between the EO advocate and those of us who know the scriptures correctly. This idea that Christ gave all men life when He died and was raised is not correct, because logically then no man before Christ was actually alive, and all men since are of necessity saved, since they have been given life. That simply is not the case.

Only those who are in Christ receive spiritual life from Him, and being in Christ is a work of the Holy Spirit, not of man. That is why salvation is by Grace, through faith. Grace is the key. The fact that there are more in Adam than in Christ is axiomatic. All through scripture, God works through, deals with, and saves a remnant, a portion, and sets apart some, and not all. Even with Israel, Paul states that a remnant shall be saved.
 
Upvote 0
R

Rightglory

Guest
Jesusfreak5000,


Rom 3:24 being justified as a gift by His grace through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus;

Like I said, you know nothing of grace.[/quote] Yes, and all men have been justified by that Grace. Man had nothing to contribute toward it, cannot effect it nor affect it in any way. We cannot even deny it took place, it is a fact of history. A competed work of Christ on the Cross.
I would think just the opposite when you restrict Christ and His work in this universe. You only want Him to save some and actually discard all the rest as garbage. What kind of Grace is that? Surely not the Grace that He sent His Son into this world, born of a women, to become Incarnate to redeem the world, so that WHOSOEVER believes on Him shall not perish.

Your view has most of mankind actually being destroyed. Hardly the God I worship and believe.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
R

Rightglory

Guest
Jesusfreak5000,
Every single soul in Christ is imputed righteousness, just as every single soul in Adam is imputed sin. That is the parallel in Romans 5, not that every single man, whether in Christ or not, is imputed righteousness just as all men are imputed sin. You must be in Christ to have that imputation. You seem to be missing that.
first man, no man has been ever imputed sin, surely not the sin of Adam. What we inherited from Adam is death. Mortality. Which is why Christ needed to give life back to man. The equation is exactly equal. All in Adam died, all in Christ shall be made alive. However, we are not even speaking of soul here. We are speaking of physical existance.
To get the "imputation" you are speaking about here all you need to be is a human being. Your view puts forth the idea that man is not of the same essence, is not of the same being. Not all of us are humans. If Christ assumed our fallen human natures in His Incarnation and raised those human natures to life, just how do you separate our a few special human beings. The only way is to develop that the nature Christ assumed was the special nature that only those some He deired to save from death would be raise. But lo and behold, we get to the end of time and all human beings are actually standing in Judgement. Just how do you get them from a pile of dust to a whole human being, made incorruptible no less.
Can you explain that theologically in your view? It seems you missed most of scripture here.
This verse is in reference to those in Adam vs. those is Christ. It cannot be referring to all men, as 5:1 is the qualifier:
Yes, it sure is, but the terminology is not IN Christ. We were never IN Adam and referencing our natures we were never IN Christ. We are Adam, He is us, We are Christ's human nature, as much as you and I are of the same essence. I am not IN you, I am you. Same essence, same nature. It is why and how Christ can redeem all mankind. Death came to our natures, we became mortal. dead, and Christ gave life, immortality back to man.
There is nothing in scripture that you can use to refute that fact. You have twisted scripture to develope an erroneous view of man, of God, of Christ, of the fall, of salvation from that fall, and the God/man relationship for which man was created and restored to by Christ through His Incarnatioin.
Rom 5:1 Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ:
Now you have changed topics and become relevant. So far you were speaking of the justification of man to God through Christ.
Now, you are speaking of the justification by faith which is man being made right, reconciled to God personally, individually. this is the salvation of our soul made possible because of the salvation from the fall.
Your passage in 1 Cor agrees with this:
1Cr 15:22 For as in Adam all die, so also in Christ all will be made alive.
It is heart of the Gospel. It is the definition of the Incarnation. Christ redeemed the world, not just man. Hardly aligns with your view at all. All means all here, not partial, some ,few, not even many. It is absolute, ALL, no exceptions. John 6:39 agrees with it, Col 1:15-20 also agrees with it.
All who are in Adam die; All who are in Christ will be made alive. However, all are not in Christ, therefore, all are not imputed His righteousness.
But it is not speaking about our salvation of our souls. This is not the indwelling or upon baptism we enter INTO Christ. A spiritual relationship. This text is referencing our natures, that we are human beings, being saved from death, the condemnation of Adam upon all men. All men need life before they can believe. A dead human being has no life, therefore cannot also LIVE IN Christ. A dead mortal being cannot LIVE IN Christ.
 
Upvote 0

Charis kai Dunamis

χάρις καὶ δύναμις
Dec 4, 2006
3,766
260
Chicago, Illinois
✟20,154.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Jesusfreak5000,
Yes, and all men have been justified by that Grace.

Once again, men are justified by grace through faith. Not all men have faith. Why else would Paul say-

Rom 5:1 Therefore, having been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ,

If all men were justified at Christ's death, then Paul's statement here is incorrect. Faith is technically not a requirement; all men benefit whether they have faith or not, since it is solely by grace to all men.

At least, that's what you say.:confused:
 
Upvote 0
R

Rightglory

Guest
Jesusfreak5000,

Once again, men are justified by grace through faith. Not all men have faith. Why else would Paul say-
Rom 5:1 Therefore, having been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ,
Because he is speaking relative to the salvation of ones soul, which is why man was saved. You have never yet shown how a dead mortal being can believe. What in your theological view redeems man from the sentence of death we all were given in Gen 3:19.

Until you can answer that, there is no union or communion with God. You have left the world in the same state as it was before Gen 3:15 which is the promise of that Savior, the redeemer who would overturn the sentence of death Gen 3:15 which is given after the promise of life. Your whole theological view, as per scripture is totally meaningless until you put life to a dead corpse where man can even have an eternal existance. Death is nothingness.

Do you think you can explain that within your view?

If all men were justified at Christ's death, then Paul's statement here is incorrect. Faith is technically not a requirement; all men benefit whether they have faith or not, since it is solely by grace to all men.
Have never stated what you are assuming. He is speaking of two distinct and different aspects of salvation. Physical and spiritual. The sequence occurs as He states in I Cor 15:25.

Faith is only needed for man to enter into union and communion with God. We did nothing to save ourselves from death because we are unable to do so. That is why Christ was needed, and it is this precise point which nullifies your whole theological interpretation. You have never given life to a dead corpse, to a mortal being who was condemned to death, annihilation. Until you can answer that the justification by faith is but a myth.

Can you explain just how God can have a spiritual relationship with a human being that is but a dead corpse?

You have actually nulified the whole work of Christ on the Cross. You deny the Incarnation. It never happened and you go right on as if the fall has never happened. You then attempt to make man's response to that Cross work as if we are being saved from something. We were saved TO have union, The union is why we were created, it did not need a salvation from anything.

Man suffered death, destruction through Adam. How clear can one make such an obvious point in Scripture. We were not created mortal. We were not created to die.

We were created for union and communion with God for an eternity. But Adam's single sin brought upon all men death. We were consigned to death, dust. Satan rules this world through the power of death. It is his realm. Christ needed to actually overcome Satan, rather than death. By defeating Satan he also defeated death. Man is no longer consigned to permanent death. All men will live eternally.

How could you possibly have a judgment of any man, let alone all men unless they had life. Which is precisely why Christ is the first born of the dead. Why? Because it was His Resurrection that was the first resurrection of our mortal natures. It is that mortal nature of ours, assumed by Christ that is being rasied at His Resurrection. By that resurrection all men have eternal life and will stand in judgment the last day.

There is a heaven and hell ONLY BECAUSE CHRIST GAVE LIFE TO MANKIND, TO THE WORLD to be more precise. Heaven and Hell do not exist if Christ is not raised from the dead. Man would be consigned to permanent death, annihilation. How difficult is that to see? Who goes to heaven or hell if all that happens to man is death, dust to dust? Can a pile of dust inhabit either place?
 
Upvote 0
R

Rightglory

Guest
nobdysfool,


Absolutely, positively, 100% true. That is exactly the crux of the difference between the EO advocate and those of us who know the scriptures correctly.
And just where have you shown that Scripture always was understood that there was no Incarnation. Christ never became man and assumed our human natures to raise them to life?

This idea that Christ gave all men life when He died and was raised is not correct, because logically then no man before Christ was actually alive, and all men since are of necessity saved, since they have been given life. That simply is not the case.
Again totally misunderstanding scripture. You treat God as if He knows nothing about the future.Or worse that God does not really know that He might or might not send His Son into this world and history to redeem mankind.

God already knew the sequence before He created Adam. When Adam sinned God permitted Satan to impose the death sentence upon the human being He created to be eternal just so it would be possible for His Son to save that human being from Satan and the power of death by assuming that nature.

In Gen 3:15 man is already essentially alive again, The fall has been corrected in God's eyes. The only thing that was needed was for Christ to come into history at some opportune time to effect that salvation from the fall, from death.

That first advent did nothing to change the present world. We do not have immortality in this life. We will still suffer physical death once, but ONLY for the purpose of sheding the body, the flesh of sin. It is the mortal nature that is man's problem, it caused him to sin.

So even now God knows that the second Advent will be the consumation of all things. But He has worked with man all through the existance of this temporal world, AS IF MAN HAD ALWAYS BEEN ALIVE AND NEVER DEAD.

It is because man was NOT given immortality immediately upon Christ resurrection that the propitiation of sin was also necessary. If God was to have communion with man in this life, the sin factor would need to be resolved. It was through the sacrifice of Himself. So that NOW, He is the High Priest, able to forgive the sins of those who desire to be in communion with Him. Those who chose not to or those who choose to freely leave the fold, can keep their sins and have them convict them in the end.

God gave life (physical) to all men, and offers communion, (spiritual life) to all men and each can freely choose whom he will serve.

Only those who are in Christ receive spiritual life from Him, and being in Christ is a work of the Holy Spirit, not of man. That is why salvation is by Grace, through faith. Grace is the key.
This is why you are so confused about salvation. ONLY those who believe are given spiritual life, that is the regeneration of man, man able to get back to prefall state of being in union with God freely.

That spiritual entrance is a synergistic work. Man must believe, accept God's call to repentance and when he does, He is permitted to LIVE IN Christ. A spiritual life in Christ. But man must first be physically alive, have immortality restored in order to have an eternal existance which is extended from his beginning union in this life, this temporal life.

that is why the salvation of man is all Grace no faith needed, But why the salvation of ones soul the union and communion is by Grace THROUGH FAITH.
You are correct on one point. Grace is truly the key. A key you have missed completely. Your view totally bypasses the Grace to all and ONLY deals with the grace through faith part which is null and void without the former.

The fact that there are more in Adam than in Christ is axiomatic.
Which is why your interpretation makes Grace null and void. It makes Christ a failure, which then puts Satan in the victors seat. Death still reigns and will reign for an eternity. Man will simply dissolve into the elments upon his temporal biological death.

Explain in your view how man becomes alive, how faith can even be a factor as per scripture. How does man become immortal, can be raised from the dead incorruptible?
Do you believe as Ben does, that faith, a spiritual realm, can actually give physical life, immortality to man? If so, then faith can give immortality, but then how do you raise all the dead, those you call reprobates to stand in judgement? Can you explain that from scripture?
 
Upvote 0

Ben johnson

Legend
Site Supporter
Feb 9, 2002
16,916
404
Oklahoma
Visit site
✟99,049.00
Faith
Christian
Quoted by Ben:
Question --- is salvation "being indwelt by Jesus and the Spirit"?
(Yes.)
Quoted by Jesusfreak5000:
That's part of it.
We agree then --- there is no salvation without Christ indwelling the heart of he who is "saved".
Quote:
Question --- does Jesus participate in sin?
(No.)

Question --- when we sin, do we by definition turn away from God?
(Yes.)
Quoted by Jesusfreak:
Yes. However, God does not turn away from us when we sin, because judicially, we are seen as righteous.
JF, please tell me your opinion of Eph5:5-6: "This we know with certainty, that no immoral or impure man, or covetous (idolater) has an inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and God. Let no one deceive you with empty words, it is on account of these things the wrath of God comes upon the sons of disobedience."

Please tell me how Christ who "came to destroy sin", who "knew no sin", participates in sin by indwelling the "sinning-believer".
Quote:
While there may be a partial relational break between us, it is always restored.
Always? Was it restored in 2Pet1:9? How about Heb10:29?
Quote:
There is a difference though, between God's judicial view of us and God's relationship with us.
The view called "Antinomianism" asserts that men can dwell in fornication, or robbery, or murder, or any number of other sins, but remain saved and Heaven-bound. How is that possible? Jesus said, "He who commits sin is a slave to sin. If therefore the Son shall make you free, you shall be free indeed." Jn8.
Quoted by Ben:
Question --- if we can WALK in sin, would that be identical to "unbelief"?
(Yes.)

QUoted by JF:

"Walking in sin" denotes the idea of practicing sin without any sort of struggle, and sort of battle between the spirit and the flesh. It is to simply "practice sin". No believer does this Ben-
Apparently we can. Heb10:26 addresses "WE". So does Rom8:12; and 13-14 are written to the "saved".
Quote:
1Jo 5:18 We know that no one who is born of God sins; but He who was born of God keeps him, and the evil one does not touch him.
It appears you're reading a mistranslation. The King James states:
1Jn5:18"We know that whosoever is born of God sinneth not; but he that is begotten of God keepeth himself, and that wicked one toucheth him not.

Keeps himself. This does align perfectly with Jude21, "KEEP YOURSELVES in the love of God". See blueltterbible.

By reading verse 21 --- Little children, keep yourselves from idols. --- "KEEP YOURSELVES" --- thus "yourselves" is the only contextual possibility. No way would John write "God keeps you", and then "keep yourselves".
Quote:
You are assuming "we" means "us christians". However it is obvious from the context that "we" is "us Jews".
No, he speaks of "falling" in 15, and "turning away from God" in 25. The entire letter of Hebrews opposes "osas"; see especially 3:6-14 & 4:11
Quote:
Wow you like to take things out of context.
Not out of context at all; in 10:29, is a man who was sanctified, and by Jesus' blood. No way he wasn't saved. He is held out as the "dangerous consequence if WE continue sinning willfully after having received FULL KNOWLEDGE of the truth.

Stacking up the "bricks of theology", a very solid structure stands on the side of "fallible salvation", but a very weak and broken one on the side of "osas"...
 
Upvote 0

Ben johnson

Legend
Site Supporter
Feb 9, 2002
16,916
404
Oklahoma
Visit site
✟99,049.00
Faith
Christian
QUoted by Jesusfreak5000:
Tell me how we "throw the Spirit away", when we had no part in ever receiving Him.
Please explain how the Spirit is not received by "belief". Refer to Acts10:43-47, and especially 11:17.
Quote:
We do not merit the Spirit...
"Believing/receiving", is not "meriting".
Quote:
the disciples didn't merit Him coming and we do not individually merit His indwelling in us. If this be the case, then we cannot possibly "demerit" his indwelling.
We received the Spirit after believing --- the point is inarguable. He indwells a believer; He does not indwell an unbeliever.
QUote:
Further, the term used for "pledge" in Ephesians is ἀρραβὼν, meaning an earnest. It was a market term, which meant simply "a down payment", confirming that the rest would in fact be paid in full. It doesn't matter what I do with the down payment; the payment is coming, in full. It isn't us who earns the payment; the pledge shows that we already have it. That's the point Paul is making. Your view of us "throwing away the Spirit" does not account for this and simply cannot account for this.
Heb10:35 says "do not throw away your confidence". Per Heb10:19 and 6:19, our "confidence", is Jesus.

We are indwelt by the Spirit, and by Jesus; if we can throw away Jesus, we can throw away the Spirit.
Quote:
There is a difference between the Spirit being "grieved" and being "thrown away". Explain how this supports us "losing the Spirit".
Because the one who insults the Spirit, also tramples Jesus and scorns the blood that ONCE SANCTIFIED him. No way he's saved, thus no way he still has the Spirit.

...but he was once sanctified....
QUote:
How do we forfeit a completed action (in the aorist tense), as stated in Rom 8:29-30, in which we are those who are said to be justified (you and I) are said to already be positionally glorified?
The concept of "forfeiting our election", is made clear in 2Pet1:5-10; we are to be diligent of our calling and election, to not be like the man who WAS ONCE PURIFIED from sins (but now is impure) --- and the consequence is "so that the gates of Heaven BE (abundantly) provided to us".

I've heard people try to argue "abundant entrance to Heaven for the RIGHTEOUS, sparse entrance to Heaven for the WICKED".

...the wicked, aren't gonna get in at all...
Quote:
Who practices those things?

1Jo 2:3 By this we know that we have come to know Him, if we keep His commandments.

Those who are His keep His commandments; this is what they do. How does one who is His suddenly not keep His commandments? According to this verse, they can't. All they can do is continue in obedience. Therefore, one who is His cannot cease to abide in Him. It is simple logic.
Please re-read John15; we are His friends IF we keep His commandments; but if we do not bear fruit and abide in Jesus, we are cut-off/cast-away/burned. The wording is clear...
.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

nobdysfool

The original! Accept no substitutes!
Feb 23, 2003
15,018
1,006
Home, except when I'm not....
✟21,146.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Constitution
nobdysfool,


And just where have you shown that Scripture always was understood that there was no Incarnation. Christ never became man and assumed our human natures to raise them to life?

Don't impose your beliefs onto what I said. I said nothing of the kind. You are bearing false witness.

RG said:
Again totally misunderstanding scripture. You treat God as if He knows nothing about the future.Or worse that God does not really know that He might or might not send His Son into this world and history to redeem mankind.

Again, I said nothing of the kind, and you cannot draw that conclusion from my words, which you quoted. You are once again bearing false witness. I said nothing of the kind, nor did I intend to say anything even remotely like that.

RG said:
God already knew the sequence before He created Adam. When Adam sinned God permitted Satan to impose the death sentence upon the human being He created to be eternal just so it would be possible for His Son to save that human being from Satan and the power of death by assuming that nature.

God pronounced the death sentence, not Satan. And you're trying to impose your beliefs over top of what I said, to make it appear that I said the opposite of what I said. You're bearing false witness.

RG said:
In Gen 3:15 man is already essentially alive again, The fall has been corrected in God's eyes. The only thing that was needed was for Christ to come into history at some opportune time to effect that salvation from the fall, from death.

More of your own beliefs, stated as though they were fact beyond denial. Scripture does not support your contention. Adam was still physically alive, but he was still under the judgment pronounced on him by God. Cast out of the Garden, told he must earn his bread by the sweat of his brow, that the earth would bring forth thorns and weeds, that women would suffer pain in childbirth, etc. Your belief doesn't hold up.

RG said:
That first advent did nothing to change the present world. We do not have immortality in this life. We will still suffer physical death once, but ONLY for the purpose of sheding the body, the flesh of sin. It is the mortal nature that is man's problem, it caused him to sin.

So even now God knows that the second Advent will be the consumation of all things. But He has worked with man all through the existance of this temporal world, AS IF MAN HAD ALWAYS BEEN ALIVE AND NEVER DEAD.

It is because man was NOT given immortality immediately upon Christ resurrection that the propitiation of sin was also necessary. If God was to have communion with man in this life, the sin factor would need to be resolved. It was through the sacrifice of Himself. So that NOW, He is the High Priest, able to forgive the sins of those who desire to be in communion with Him. Those who chose not to or those who choose to freely leave the fold, can keep their sins and have them convict them in the end.

God gave life (physical) to all men, and offers communion, (spiritual life) to all men and each can freely choose whom he will serve.

I realize that this is what you believe. You are free to do so. what you are not free to do, is to try and impose it on me, or anyone else, or to use it to try and twist what I or anyone else says, to bear false witness against us, as you have done here.

RG said:
This is why you are so confused about salvation.

Actually, I'm not confused about it at all. I'd appreciate it if you'd stop with the bearing false witness.

RG said:
ONLY those who believe are given spiritual life, that is the regeneration of man, man able to get back to prefall state of being in union with God freely.

Those who have been given spiritual life are those who believe.

RG said:
That spiritual entrance is a synergistic work. Man must believe, accept God's call to repentance and when he does, He is permitted to LIVE IN Christ. A spiritual life in Christ. But man must first be physically alive, have immortality restored in order to have an eternal existance which is extended from his beginning union in this life, this temporal life.

More of your backward view. Initial Salvation is monergistic, and becomes synergistic only after the man is regenerated, believes, is forgiven, and justified. That sets him apart unto Christ, (sanctification). The walk from that point on is synergistic.

RG said:
that is why the salvation of man is all Grace no faith needed, But why the salvation of ones soul the union and communion is by Grace THROUGH FAITH.
You are correct on one point. Grace is truly the key. A key you have missed completely. Your view totally bypasses the Grace to all and ONLY deals with the grace through faith part which is null and void without the former.

More false witness. once again, you are imposing your own view as though it were the standard, when it is not. What you need to learn is that I do not recognize any authority other than scripture in these matters. So if you wish to engage with me, or any others here, you must confine yourself to the scriptures. You keep appealing to an authority which I find no warrant in scripture. And it seems to me that you can';t confine yourself to just scripture, because you cannot prove your view from scripture. In our minds, that makes it immediately suspect.

RG said:
Which is why your interpretation makes Grace null and void. It makes Christ a failure, which then puts Satan in the victors seat. Death still reigns and will reign for an eternity. Man will simply dissolve into the elments upon his temporal biological death.

Once again, you demonstrate that you don't understand what I believe, and cannot even represent it properly to try and refute it.

RG said:
Explain in your view how man becomes alive, how faith can even be a factor as per scripture. How does man become immortal, can be raised from the dead incorruptible?
Do you believe as Ben does, that faith, a spiritual realm, can actually give physical life, immortality to man? If so, then faith can give immortality, but then how do you raise all the dead, those you call reprobates to stand in judgement? Can you explain that from scripture?

Given your propensity for misrepresentation, and the multiple times you've borne false witness against me just in this post, I believe I'll refrain from answering those questions. Not because I cannot, but because I do have regard for that which I believe, and for what My Lord Jesus said about pearls.
 
Upvote 0

Ben johnson

Legend
Site Supporter
Feb 9, 2002
16,916
404
Oklahoma
Visit site
✟99,049.00
Faith
Christian
Quoted by NBF:
Isn't it odd that RightGlory inserts himself into every conversation, even those which aren't directed to him? He answers posts directed at other people, and it appears that he is attempting to take over this thread. All I see is confusion.
"Rightglory" is wrong on some points; the concept of "all men redeemed" for one --- only believers are redeemed. But he's right on many of his points --- and he's shredding some of the "pillars of Calvinism"...

(No disrespect intended...)
 
Upvote 0

cygnusx1

Jacob the twister.....
Apr 12, 2004
56,208
3,104
UK Northampton
Visit site
✟94,926.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
what is being imputed here friends , death or SIN ............


In the 2nd commandment, revealed in Exodus 20:4-6, God warns man, "Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, (1) visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; and (2) shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments."

Exodus 34:6-7 says, "And the LORD passed by before him, and proclaimed, The LORD, The LORD God, (1) merciful and gracious, longsuffering, and abundant in goodness and truth, Keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, and (2) that will by no means clear the guilty; visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, and upon the children's children, unto the third and to the fourth generation."


Numbers14:17-18 similarly says, "And now, I beseech thee, let the power of my Lord be great, according as thou hast spoken, saying, The LORD is (1) longsuffering, and of great mercy, forgiving iniquity and transgression, and (2) by no means clearing the guilty, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation."


and

“That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias” (Matthew 23:35; also Luke 11:50,51).


Romans


4:1 What shall we say then that Abraham our father, as pertaining to the flesh, hath found? 4:2 For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath whereof to glory; but not before God. 4:3 For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness. 4:4 Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt. 4:5 But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness. 4:6 Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man, unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works, 4:7 Saying, Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven, and whose sins are covered. 4:8 Blessed is the man to whom the Lord will not impute sin.

5:19 For as by one man’s disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous. 5:20 Moreover the law entered, that the offence might abound. But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound: 5:21 That as sin hath reigned unto death, even so might grace reign through righteousness unto eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.