At the risk of being called gullible and worse, let me try to explain why this doesn't really get me too worked up...
First, I don't know when or why this article was edited. I took some time and did some research at the Internet Wayback Machine to look at previous versions of the website and article. You can do this yourself also at
http://web.archive.org. From what I can tell, the article has also been shortened drastically from its original posting.
Second, I pulled the article from an older version of the site into my text editor and did a text comparison, line by line, one sentence at a time.
From what remains on the website today, (62 sentences in the original posting), there are 12 sentences that have been edited and another 13 that have been completely removed. Far more than just what was in the OP is edited, if you really take the time to compare the previous article with the one that is there today.
However, in a side-by-side reading of each posting, the message has not changed. What has been removed in these edits and deletions are references to the name "Emma" and/or any reference to the fact that this was a female angel.
I'm only speculating since I obviously have no firsthad information, but I sincerely doubt that the focus of that article was ever intended to be Emma or female angels, which may well be the reason for the edits, since the Internet has gone into a tizzy with the number of people all worked up about female angels and "Emma".
That said, it does indeed appear dishonest and/or deceptive to take an article that has been available for 5 years and edit it with no explanation, particularly since one of the edits is a quote of what God said to Bentley. If my above speculation has any merit at all, then certainly the Fresh Fire website could have handled it better.
So, that brings me back to the old saying "eat the hay and leave the sticks". Since, contrary to popular belief, I've never seen Bentley as anything more than an imperfect vessel being used of God, this doesn't really throw me. Some of the things I've heard from Bentley are right on the money. Other things are kinda out in la la land. And so, instead of tossing the baby out with the bathwater, I try to eat the hay and leave the sticks, a lot like I do with many posters here on CF...
Anyway, let the cries of "gullibility" and "blindness" commence!