• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Fabricating Data in Climate Science - The Hijack

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
A

Aryeh

Well-Known Member
Dec 4, 2016
825
366
Los Angeles
✟36,820.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Celibate

You don't remember On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life by Charles Darwin?

"Since the dawn of history the Negro has owned the continent of Africa – rich beyond the dream of poet’s fancy, crunching acres of diamonds beneath his bare black feet and yet he never picked one up from the dust until a white man showed to him its glittering light.​

His land swarmed with powerful and docile animals, yet he never dreamed a harness, cart, or sled.​

A hunter by necessity, he never made an axe, spear, or arrowhead worth preserving beyond the moment of its use. He lived as an ox, content to graze for an hour.​

In a land of stone and timber he never sawed a foot of lumber, carved a block, or built a house save of broken sticks and mud.​

With league on league of ocean strand and miles of inland seas, for four thousand years he watched their surface ripple under the wind, heard the thunder of the surf on his beach, the howl of the storm over his head, gazed on the dim blue horizon calling him to worlds that lie beyond, and yet he never dreamed a sail.”
​
The Church, and Academia adopted his theory on the "races" for a very long time, and depending on where you are it is still the case. The Church was especially staunch on Darwinism and races to justify their imperialism, or "spreading the truth." Academia prefers more subtle conflagration - buried in biology, for example.

Those example I gave weren't weird; they were examples of the hauteur and myopia of academics.

Barry Marshall had to drink an entire petri dish of H. Pylori because academia refused to believe ulcers were caused by bacterial infection. The concensus was that ulcers were caused by spices, and stress.

Barry Marshall was awarded the Nobel Prize in medicine and physiology in 2005 - 2005! He and his partner were studying and publishing their findings since the early 1980s.

We have not come very far, and this is why I said concensus is the absolutely wrong parameter to judge academic paradigms. Too much progress has been ignored because of the consensual immobility of minds.
 
Upvote 0

RickG

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Oct 1, 2011
10,092
1,430
Georgia
✟128,873.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Saucy said:
We're told that 97% of all scientists around the world believe man-made global warming.
Click to expand...
That is not an accurate statement. The 97% is not what scientists believe. The 97% is what the actual peer reviewed published climate science shows. Now, just speaking of scientists around the world, 100% of the National Academy's of Science around the world have published statements affirming climate change and attribute it to anthropogenic processes.

But there's records in the ice and otherwise that tell us there were times when the carbon levels where much higher than they are today, and the earth was much warmer than it is today.
Click to expand...
There are no 'ice records' that show CO2 levels higher in the past than today. The last time time CO2 exceeded 400 ppm was the mid Pliocene 2.2 - 3.6 Ma. and is shown in sediment cores, not ice cores. And yes, the earth has been much warmer than it is today. However, that is when the global continental configuration did not cover the poles forming ice caps nor were there 7 billion humans with limited agricultural space available.

The sun and the earth have cycles.
Click to expand...
They certainly do. Milankovitch Cycles show that we are progressing toward an ice age cycle, however, global average temperatures continue to increase at a rate not seen in proxy records. As for the sun, TSI has been decreasing over the past 40 years while GAT's continue to increase.
 
Reactions: USincognito
Upvote 0

RickG

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Oct 1, 2011
10,092
1,430
Georgia
✟128,873.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
AJTruth said:
Climate change, biggest hoax since sasquatch

Used to be called Global Warming. They we're unable to sell this snake oil as Global Warming. So, now it's called climate change. What a joke!
Click to expand...
Just curious, when did they do that?
 
Upvote 0
A

Aryeh

Well-Known Member
Dec 4, 2016
825
366
Los Angeles
✟36,820.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Celibate
rambot said:
Also (for some reason, i cant go back and edit my posts)
You seem accutely aware of the models lack of data. What kind of data is included and what data is lacking based on your understanding?1
Click to expand...


I am not a climatologist, or atmospheric chemist.

My expertise is mathematics - mathematical physics, numerical methods, dynamical systems, and topological field theory.

But, as a mathematician that does stochastic modeing, I can see the mistakes in the fundamentals, and presentation of research because of my experience in academia, and because of my math background.

I know what it takes to provide precise AND accurate results on a 4,500,000,000 year old DYNAMICAL system. You need an entire city block of current-generation quantum computing processors to get within 1/1000 of the accurate data needed to produce such confident statements in AGW.

I can calculate the theory based models for AGW, and it doesn't work without accepting massive amounts of extrapolated error.

I don't dare dismiss an entire field of study, and in fact many brilliant scientists have no idea of the politics and "liberties" taken in research methods.

The university from which I graduated required us to take graduate modules on ethics - and much of the "maligned" sentiments I have for academia was a taught apprehension to have based on the ethical trajectory and history of academia.

Not to mention working in academia. Although, I will say mathematicians are somewhat of a "political peninsula" when it comes to raw scientific philosophy - perhaps due to the purity of numbers and operations in general. We spend a great deal of time proving certain elements of certain spaces can perform operations - like adding a + a: it does not always equal 2a, nor is the operator "+" necessarily a legal operation.

So, my responses come from my experience, but my experience is heavily influenced by academia and politics of academia - from schooling to industry.
 
Upvote 0

Heissonear

Geochemist and Stratigrapher
Site Supporter
Dec 21, 2011
4,962
982
Lake Conroe
✟201,642.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Meanwhile, fabrication of data by scientists with intent ........



Why did the leading scientists at NOAA do this? It is pretty self explanatory. The Pause has showed CO2 as second or third order in regulating Earth's temperature which is contrary to what many leading scientific and political groups have before the world stated over and over and over.

Rather than agree with observation they hold to a failing theory. In holding to the failing theory they chose to hide their intensions, willfully produce fake data, and try to deceive the masses. And then a whistle-blower stands forth.
 
Reactions: Aryeh
Upvote 0

rambot

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2006
28,698
16,219
Up your nose....wid a rubbah hose.
✟455,877.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
Upvote 0

PapaZoom

Well-Known Member
Nov 3, 2013
4,377
4,392
car
✟66,806.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Private
Reactions: Heissonear, Uncle Siggy and Aryeh
Upvote 0

grasping the after wind

That's grasping after the wind
Jan 18, 2010
19,458
6,355
Clarence Center NY USA
✟245,147.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

I believe that, as with climate change alarmism, it was fear based propaganda from a group that wielded extreme social power. The similarity between eugenicists and climate alarmists on the cherry picking of data is also most instructive.
 
Reactions: Heissonear
Upvote 0

rambot

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2006
28,698
16,219
Up your nose....wid a rubbah hose.
✟455,877.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
grasping the after wind said:
I believe that, as with climate change alarmism, it was fear based propaganda from a group that wielded extreme social power. The similarity between eugenicists and climate alarmists on the cherry picking of data is also most instructive.
Click to expand...
I have no doubt you do believe that.
I mean, you'd be wrong but you certainly do believe that.

And by cherry picking data, you mean that those silly finicky scientists pick out 95% of the data that fits their theory and ignores the rest?
 
Reactions: USincognito
Upvote 0

rambot

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2006
28,698
16,219
Up your nose....wid a rubbah hose.
✟455,877.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
Upvote 0

rambot

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2006
28,698
16,219
Up your nose....wid a rubbah hose.
✟455,877.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
PapaZoom said:
Settled science? Ok then.
Click to expand...
Oh, don't worry. I wouldn't want to put that on you; I'm not sure I'd trust you to be able to establish what settled science looks like. I'm not 100% confident in skeptic's ability to find "manipulated data" either so.....

hmmmmm.

Let me know when you've read the articles I've linked to that explains exactly how "manipulated" the data was.
 
Reactions: USincognito
Upvote 0

HitchSlap

PROUDLY PRIMATE
Aug 6, 2012
14,723
5,468
✟288,596.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Are you a paid shill for the petroleum companies?

 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Farmers Sued Over Deleted Climate Data. So the Government Will Put It Back.
Replies
0
Views
271
American Politics
Say it aint so
Facts Rebut Climate Alarm From U.N. Chief
Replies
2
Views
591
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
HarleyER
H
Uncharted Territory, rapid warming greatly exceeds models' forecasts
Replies
122
Views
8K
Physical & Life Sciences
eclipsenow
The Unsustainable Costs of President Biden’s Climate Agenda
Replies
43
Views
2K
American Politics
loveofourlord
L
Prophecy of Technology in the Bible (Daniel, Matthew, Revelation)
Replies
27
Views
4K
Christian Scriptures
jamiec
Menu
Log in
Register