Explosions in Brussels

[expos4ever]

Considering he created isis and then sat on his hands while they started taking thousands of sex slaves, including children...Yea, may he burn in hell.

I am curious - where in your translation of the Scriptures does Jesus advocate that we wish our enemies to "burn in hell"?

 

[The_Laconic_Dead]

I am curious - where in your translation of the Scriptures does Jesus advocate that we wish our enemies to "burn in hell"?

Right after it says, "Kill em all and let Me sort em out!"

 

[The Portuguese Baptist]

The majority is irrelevant. You have a group of people where 10% of them bring great sadness to your people.

You can´t look into evryones head. You can´t take the 10% out of them...so you send all to their origin country and reduce their overall number in your society to 0. And you have peace

By that standard, all whites need to be deported as well, because some of them commit criminal acts which disturb Europe's peace.

We cannot be disrespectful towards them in that manner. That flies in the face of the concept of democracy. Rather, what we can do is increase the level of authority control for Muslims, and rank them as higher in the scale of suspicion for terrorists. However, we cannot group all Muslims together and see them all as dangerous like that. Most are not. We need to do our best to filter out the bad ones, arrest them, and place them in jail. But we cannot deport all Muslims, because many are respectable, innocent human beings who have done no wrong and who condemn these attacks like we do.

 

[The Portuguese Baptist]

What? For someone to state the truth?

Some of us are not burdened with the self imposed mental disorder that is political correctness.

How many people do they need to murder, rape and torture before people are willing to accept the truth about Islam? That it Islamic fundamentalism is completely incompatible with western values, and only results in violence with the two are forced to mix.

What we are witnessing in the EU is the failure of multiculturalism. Not all cultures are the same band worthy of the same respect. Some are better than others.

There is a difference between Islam and Islamic fundamentalism. Not all Muslims are radicals like that. I personally know a Muslim person who condemns these attacks, like we do.

Be careful on how you select the words when talking about multiculturalism, because I would like you to clarify your position. Indeed, I agree that some cultures are better than others, but all are actually worthy of the same respect. All humans are human and possess the same human rights. We cannot discriminate them based on race, religion, gender or anything like that. Everyone deserves the same amount of honour, dignity and respect — unless anyone has committed an act that breaks anyone else's human rights (like carrying out a terrorist attack); if anyone every does anything like it, that person needs to be deprived of that respect, but not that person's entire race or religion.

 

[The Portuguese Baptist]

http://www.pewforum.org/2013/04/30/the-worlds-muslims-religion-politics-society-overview/

Keep telling yourself it's just a minority.

Reality is, the "Oreo's & anime" muslims are the minority.

That statistic talks about ‘Supporting Sharia’ — not necessarily supporting terrorist acts to kill Westerners.

 

[Berean777]

...

 

[grandvizier1006]

Evil requires an audience willing to react to its every move. If the governments of the world are not careful, they may play right in the hands of this manifested evil.

Governments need to apply the name of Christ Jesus and his teachings to combat this evil. Warefare, anger, emotions are not the solution to this growing worldwide problem.

Let the world be united in prayer to all the victims, including those who have waged war against Jesus Christ. Let the world come to Christ united, to show to the enemies of the cross, that peace can only be realised by through one name Jesus Christ. Let the world educate the enemy through the world media, that the way to win the hearts and minds of people of the wold, is through Jesus Christ. Let the world be united in rallying as one voice to say that this violent and destructive action is unacceptable, that the world stands united in Chist. The enemy must be made to understand tha the only way that they can make a difference is by coming to Christ and sharing their sorrows, by peaceful means. Waging war against flesh is a futile act that will eventually bring destruction against their own people. History has shown that violence willnot serve what they want and that Jesus as the prince of peace, will give them what they want.



The above ca only be attained through the one name.

On the other hand if this action is a false flag operation carried out by a nation calling itself the friend of the world, then expect that your actions will bring detruction upon your peoples. Deception has never prospered to realise it to the end goal. The light of Christ has always xposed it and when false flag is exposed, expect no favours from the world, where it will become very hard for this unbecoming of a nation, to survive without friends in the world. The nation or nations involved in any false flag operaton will be exposed by Christ. Expect judgement to come. Consider your action the bankruptcy of your nation and peoples. Look at history in particular to the debt that nations responsible for waging wars still are repaying. Not a good idea to delve in evil is it!

As much as I love these sentiments, it isn't possible and might just be a short-term solution even if it took centuries to undertake successfully.

I think that, as violent as things are now, cool heads will prevail. The Middle East might open up to outside influences and eventually let missionaries in some of the countries--and when that happens we can begin our work. But for that to happen democracy has to prevail and freedom of thouht and conscience needs to exist--right now ISIS and various other regional conflicts are preventing that from happening.

 

[The_Laconic_Dead]

That statistic talks about ‘Supporting Sharia’ — not necessarily supporting terrorist acts to kill Westerners.

There are 3 main types of Muslim. Jihadists (what we saw in Belgium), Islamists (Sharia supporters), and the Tolerable Muslims (anime & Oreo types with western values).

Neither jihadists nor islamists should be allowed into the west. Let them rot where they are.

 

[LoveBeingAMuslimah]

So the target is the EU. I guess we are meant to get all hard hearted about Muslims fleeing from Salafist Jihaddi groups in Syria and Iraq etc a

Turkey was attacked by ISIS and secularist/Marxist Kurds, so it's not just the EU that ISIS is targeting nor is it just those referred to as salafi jihadis who are committing terrorist attacks.

Most Syrian refugees from Syria are fleeing Assad and his allies (Hezbollah, Russia, IRG, Shi'a militias from around the world, including from Iraq where they are terrorizing the Sunni population) and none of those can be considered salafi jihadis.

In any case, however, I agree with the principle of your post (about not being so cold to people fleeing unjust violence).

 

[SoldierOfTheKing]

That statistic talks about ‘Supporting Sharia’ — not necessarily supporting terrorist acts to kill Westerners.

That's a serious problem in and of itself. The dangers of Islamic immigration go far beyond terrorism.

 

[The Portuguese Baptist]

There are 3 main types of Muslim. Jihadists (what we saw in Belgium), Islamists (Sharia supporters), and the Tolerable Muslims (anime & Oreo types with western values).

Neither jihadists nor islamists should be allowed into the west. Let them rot where they are.

Why not islamists?

 

[The Portuguese Baptist]

That's a serious problem in and of itself. The dangers of Islamic immigration go far beyond terrorism.

Would you clarify?

 

[PatrickT]

By that standard, all whites need to be deported as well, because some of them commit criminal acts which disturb Europe's peace.

We cannot be disrespectful towards them in that manner. That flies in the face of the concept of democracy. Rather, what we can do is increase the level of authority control for Muslims, and rank them as higher in the scale of suspicion for terrorists. However, we cannot group all Muslims together and see them all as dangerous like that. Most are not. We need to do our best to filter out the bad ones, arrest them, and place them in jail. But we cannot deport all Muslims, because many are respectable, innocent human beings who have done no wrong and who condemn these attacks like we do.

You may chose your way. I have chosen mine. I see this threat and i will work towards its resolution. I won´t allow that my families and friends security is sacrificed on the shrine of political correctness.

The fence in Idomeni is a first fire wall. But it is only part of the solution. Those who are respectable and innocent can blame their evil companions for their fate.

 

[Berean777]

...

 

[Goonie]

The majority is irrelevant. You have a group of people where 10% of them bring great sadness to your people.

You can´t look into evryones head. You can´t take the 10% out of them...so you send all to their origin country and reduce their overall number in your society to 0. And you have peace

I've got to ask at which point in your plan do you invade Poland?

 

[mindlight]

Turkey was attacked by ISIS and secularist/Marxist Kurds, so it's not just the EU that ISIS is targeting nor is it just those referred to as salafi jihadis who are committing terrorist attacks.

This attack was targeting the EU- Brussels is its administrative centre. The Paris attack also was targeting the EU in its largest continental city and on the occasion of a France-Germany football match. But despite the political context it is innocent people that have died. ISIS committed these murders deliberately

The attack in Ankara was a mistake by the Kurds. The PKK is not Marxist ( Democratic confederalist with a strong focus on equality for example for women is better). But NATO and the EU regards them as terrorists. Though sympathetic to the cause of Kurdish nationalism I do not agree with terrorism.

Most Syrian refugees from Syria are fleeing Assad and his allies (Hezbollah, Russia, IRG, Shi'a militias from around the world, including from Iraq where they are terrorizing the Sunni population) and none of those can be considered salafi jihadis.

Your a Sunni you do not like Shias and Hezbollah and many of the others are no better than the Sunni Salafists. Assad is the only one protecting Christians - none of the others seem remotely concerned about the genocide against them except perhaps the Kurds in Iraq.

In any case, however, I agree with the principle of your post (about not being so cold to people fleeing unjust violence).

Exactly

 

[Landon Caeli]

Why not islamists?

Because we hate Sharia Law and refuse to tolerate it.

 

[mindlight]

I've got to ask at which point in your plan do you invade Poland?

Think he regards Poland as the lost territories so he might not agree "invade" is the correct word?

"Von der Maas bis an die Memel..."

 

[Goonie]

Think he regards Poland as the lost territories so he might not agree "invade" is the correct word?

"Von der Maas bis an die Memel..."

Your right, and I forgot about Austria.

 

[PatrickT]

I've got to ask at which point in your plan do you invade Poland?

Thats quite stupid to say this. Poland is absolut rightwing and one of the nations that closed down completly for refugees. Their preisdent shouts about islamic invasion and wants deport all of them.