Stephen Kendall
believer of Jesus Christ
Since you seem to think that God couldn't possibly exist without solid evidence and that Creationism is an invalid theory because it is unproven, prove to me that the Big Bang took place and how. If these cannot be explained in the same sense that you wish for us to explain God and Creationism then I'm afraid that it can't be considered "Science" any more than God and Creationism can and if you believe in it without understanding it, you live by just as much faith as theists do.
You really don't want all those equations planted on here do you? They wouldn't make any sense for you, me and well almost everyone.
If the balance of things involved timeless voids and chaos, that is no problem with me. I don't really know that much about God or how he spent his time. God having systems with balance (laws of science) that is ok. What is a miracle in science, non-existence? Then science is very limited and really brainless and innate. That is ok, for that is what it is. It is mechanical in nature, with its laws keeping a balance to things like chaos, holes and bangs. However, since this is all the work of God, then his interventions like salvation, miracles, non-mechanical things like peace, love and joy are the balances of good versus evil. Wouldn't it be like God to make this rather simple mechanical universe for the purposes of spiritual things like good and evil?
Upvote
0