No, you're wrong about this. Speciation is reproductive isolation. We we can, for example, make lions and tigers mate in captivity, but in the wild it never happens. Lions are a type of cat. Tigers are another type of cat. No point in denying the obvious.
You are willing to accept that God did it, but you refuse to accept the way He did it. That's how creationists differ from other Christians. It doesn't mean that you aren't a Christian; it's not a salvation issue.
Which is a major problem for creationism. If creationism were true; there would be nice, clear distinctions between species. But as Darwin pointed out, that's not the case. We see all sorts of intermediate cases that are very difficult to resolve. And that's exactly what you would see if evolution produced those living kinds.
You've been listening to racists too much. Not only is there only one human species today, there is only one race of humans. Formerly, we did have other races of humans, like Neanderthals. But not today. Evolutionary theory has shown that there are no biological human races today. Interestingly, the data that confirmed this, was by a team headed by a devout evangelical Christian. Would you like to learn about that?
Very few creationists still believe that foolishness. Although there were many such creationists in the early decades of the 20th century, Hitler's regime pretty much put an end to that. It is true that as late as the 1990s, some creationist leaders were still writing about the supposed intellectual and spiritual inferiority of black people. But few today would have your outlook on it. It is true that we have an animal body. Our bodies are made naturally, but that is not what makes us a living soul. Read your Bible.
Darwin outraged creationists when he argued that if "savages" were brought to England, in a few generations, they'd be just like other Englishmen. For him, the perceived inferiority of other nations was cultural, not biological. Like most Englishmen of his time, he thought England was the pinnacle of humanity. But he was able to see that had no biological basis.
This is not to say that all creationists of the time were racists. It's interesting that Samuel Wilberforce, a loud and persistent opponent of Darwin's theory, was (like Darwin) an opponent of slavery and rejoiced with Darwin when England banned slavery throughout the Empire.
Today, most creationists have rejected the racist foundations of creationism.
If you get nothing else from this discussion, remember that evolution is not about increasing complexity or even necessarily about improvement. In some cases, (like mammalian skeletons) it actually simplifies things, and occasionally, it can actually make things worse.
If you just remember "descent with modification", it might help.
God SAID how he did it. You literally quoted that he didn’t directly underneath where I quoted Gensis on how animals reproduce
“All creationist were racists”. Sorry I don’t believe you. Jesus wasn’t racisit, he even said we are all one blood. So does many other places in the Bible. Please don’t state empty statements just to fit in your imagination theories. Just because some “Christians” might have been proves nothing. Should I say all Catholics are pedophiles and that Catholics teach pedophilia just because a period of time in history this was heavy in that church?! Clearly no. So please don’t do the same.
furthermore, the theology of Darwin is indeed what the theory teaches or else you wouldn’t have the survival of the strongest species or more intelligent, etc etc. That’s literally the theory.
it’s amazing why people are so stuck to a terrible theory just because it’s currently the fad in the communities.
furthermore, rape wouldn’t be wrong in the theory since were just evolved from animals and we’re just propagating our species according to the theory. If we come from animals then God lied when he stated he created Adam and Eve and how he did it.
Lots of fables are created by the theory of evolution. And that fable started in the times of Greece prior to Christ, this isn’t new:
The philosophers of ancient Greece had their own creation myths. Anaximander proposed that animals could be transformed from one kind into another, and Empedocles speculated that they were made up of various combinations of preexisting parts.
the concept behind the term was developed by a number of Greek and Roman philosophers. Namely Anaximander, Empedocles, and Lucretius.
Anaximander laid out a theory of evolution more than 2,000 years ago. As we will come to see, this theory sounds eerily similar to the modern concept of evolution. Anaximander was the second philosopher of the Milesian school, coming after Thales and before Anaximenes. Anaximander’ teacher, Thales, predicted an eclipse which modern astronomers say took place on May 28th, 585 B.C.E. We can use this historical event as a marker, thereby placing both Thales and Anaximander in this time period.
Yep the myth came from the Iron Age era! But some “modern” folks think it’s new.
“What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun.” Ecclesiastes 1:9
“Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing to be wise, they became fools” Romans 1:21-22
“3 For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine, but according to their own desires, because they have itching ears, they will heap up for themselves teachers; 4 and they will turn their ears away from the truth, and be turned aside to fables.”
2 Timothy 4:3-4
The definition of science is KNOWLEDGE.
1 Timothy 6:20 “avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called”
Colossians 2:8
“Beware lest anyone cheat you through philosophy and empty deceit, according to the tradition of men, according to the basic principles of the world, and not according to Christ.”
Proverbs 16:25 states, "There is a way which seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death."
During the end times:
The flood would be mocked ✅
The second coming would be mocked ✅
The scriptures would be mocked ✅
It’s getting more and more:
3 Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts, 4 And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation. 5 For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water: 6 Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished” 2 Peter 3
