• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

  • The rule regarding AI content has been updated. The rule now rules as follows:

    Be sure to credit AI when copying and pasting AI sources. Link to the site of the AI search, just like linking to an article.

Existential Age vs Physical Age

Status
Not open for further replies.

razeontherock

Well-Known Member
May 24, 2010
26,546
1,480
WI
✟35,597.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Hmmm! He does have a valid point though! Your claim is akin to having your cake and eating it too!

One can philosophise and justify almost any notion no matter how absurd it may be. Empirically speaking; What you claim is not possible without defining exactly what you mean by "Physically" and "Existentially". My English is not up to par with yours so please clarify.:wave:

I think he's done that in this thread, and also pointed out why there would be no proof of the younger of the two "ages."
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,435
52,722
Guam
✟5,182,747.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I think he's done that in this thread, and also pointed out why there would be no proof of the younger of the two "ages."
Thank you, bro.

I submitted a request to have it shut down.

It's run its course as far as I'm concerned.
 
Upvote 0

mzungu

INVICTUS
Dec 17, 2010
7,162
250
Earth!
✟39,975.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I think he's done that in this thread, and also pointed out why there would be no proof of the younger of the two "ages."
I am not asking for evidence but for a clear definition. Once we know exactly what it is we are measuring then we can come to conclusions. If AV is separating the age of the atoms that comprise an object and the object as a whole then suffice it to say that the atoms have a greater age than the object. But this in no way explains embedded age!
 
Upvote 0

Grumpy Old Man

Well-Known Member
Aug 30, 2011
647
24
UK
✟1,001.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Take a number and get in line.

You're not funny. Anyway, are you going to prove your idea, or not?

Thank you, bro.

I submitted a request to have it shut down.

It's run its course as far as I'm concerned.

Hmmm, your trolling is over then I guess? Are you going to have your other thread on this exact same topic shut down too?
 
Upvote 0

British Bulldog

Active Member
Jul 8, 2011
370
7
south oxfordshire
✟574.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
UK-Conservative
I think he's done that in this thread, and also pointed out why there would be no proof of the younger of the two "ages."

He seems to have imploded in his last few posts. But then, when you've admitted that believing the earth is 'really' only 6000 years old is contrary to all the evidence and you have nothing to support your belief except your need to believe it otherwise your entire faith crumbles and your hopes of getting into heaven with it, then you've argued yourself into a pretty tight corner and implosion is the only real alternative left.
 
Upvote 0

Mr Dave

God Save The Queen!
Apr 2, 2010
7,223
762
Sheffield
✟40,710.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
Mod-Hat On

images


Thread closed at request of the OP.

Mod-Hat Off
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.