• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Evolution Question

Hespera

Junior Member
Dec 16, 2008
7,237
201
usa
✟8,860.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
Private
Well you pretty just much called all the ones on the very page liars. THAT was the VERY 1st question I asked. Go read it the postings! Which again as I said was the basis of my 2nd question! If the answer would of been NO across the board, this thread would of been moot!!!!

I'm only go by what I was told from the very first page. So I'm not the liar!


This liar liar stuff is really uncool and you both should cut it out.

Our immediate ancestors were apes, not monkeys and nobody says otherwise, except for religious reasons. Period. Its a stupid topic.

I am curious btw.... what was your purpose in your original post? What were you trying to accomplish?
 
Upvote 0

GuidanceNeeded

“Seek peace, and pursue it. (Proverbs 34:14)”
Mar 26, 2009
887
43
✟23,766.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
This liar liar stuff is really uncool and you both should cut it out.

I do apologize if it seemed as if I was calling anyone a liar, I wasn't. One thing I do not like is being called a liar.

Our immediate ancestors were apes, not monkeys and nobody says otherwise, except for religious reasons. Period. Its a stupid topic.

I am curious btw.... what was your purpose in your original post? What were you trying to accomplish?

If you read down further you will see my 2nd posting.
 
Upvote 0

Skaloop

Agnostic atheist, pro-choice anti-abortion
May 10, 2006
16,332
899
49
Burnaby
Visit site
✟44,046.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-NDP
Austrolapithicus (There were two species of these, I forget their full names. Africanis or something, I think was one of them.)

A. africanus and A. afarensis are the two main ones. But there are some other Australopithecus species, such as A. garhi and A. robustus and A. bosei that are not as well-known. Generally because we have fewer/less complete specimens, and we are unsure about whether they are distant cousins of our ancestors, or direct ancestors to the Homo line. Also, we cannot yet be certain whether they are completely distinct species.
 
Upvote 0

atomweaver

Senior Member
Nov 3, 2006
1,706
181
"Flat Raccoon", Connecticut
✟25,391.00
Faith
Agnostic
Politics
US-Democrat
Well you pretty just much called all the ones on the very page liars. THAT was the VERY 1st question I asked. Go read it the postings! Which again as I said was the basis of my 2nd question! If the answer would of been NO across the board, this thread would of been moot!!!!

I'm only go by what I was told from the very first page.

How convenient, as all of the more detailed explanations and you know, dialogue occurred after the first page...

So I'm not the liar!

Sure you are, what else does one call deliberate dishonesty? You are pretending like the further explanations of what was meant by each poster after page 1 didn't happen. So I guess in addition to being a cannibal, you are also apparently a liar.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,857,093
52,819
Guam
✟5,226,232.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
245 posts and this discussion on evolution is still going on.

You evolutionists don't get it, do you?

Jesus didn't believe in evolution, and neither should we.

In evolutionist doctrine, Eve came first, followed by Adam thousands of years later.

Yet Jesus clearly spoke of Adam and Eve being married to each other.
 
Upvote 0

atomweaver

Senior Member
Nov 3, 2006
1,706
181
"Flat Raccoon", Connecticut
✟25,391.00
Faith
Agnostic
Politics
US-Democrat
245 posts and this discussion on evolution is still going on.

You evolutionists don't get it, do you?

Jesus didn't believe in evolution, and neither should we.

In evolutionist doctrine, Eve came first, followed by Adam thousands of years later.

Yet Jesus clearly spoke of Adam and Eve being married to each other.

If you say so, cannibal.
 
Upvote 0

GuidanceNeeded

“Seek peace, and pursue it. (Proverbs 34:14)”
Mar 26, 2009
887
43
✟23,766.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
If you say so, cannibal.


Well seeing how the name calling isn't going to stop (starting to feel like I'm in kindergarten) which was one thing I asked to stop, I am now stepping out.

I will stop by after a bit to see if we are up in grade levels.

Good day and God Bless everyone
 
Upvote 0

TemperateSeaIsland

Mae hen wlad fy nhadau yn annwyl i mi
Aug 7, 2005
3,195
171
Wales, UK
✟37,185.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
245 posts and this discussion on evolution is still going on.

You evolutionists don't get it, do you?

Jesus didn't believe in evolution, and neither should we.

In evolutionist doctrine, Eve came first, followed by Adam thousands of years later.

Yet Jesus clearly spoke of Adam and Eve being married to each other.

How did Judas die? Exploding in the middle of a field or hanging? You decide...
 
Upvote 0

Hespera

Junior Member
Dec 16, 2008
7,237
201
usa
✟8,860.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
Private
245 posts and this discussion on evolution is still going on.

You evolutionists don't get it, do you?

Jesus didn't believe in evolution, and neither should we.

In evolutionist doctrine, Eve came first, followed by Adam thousands of years later.

Yet Jesus clearly spoke of Adam and Eve being married to each other.


Actually, it is you theocreologsits who dont get it and moreover, are incapable of getting it.
 
Upvote 0

Skaloop

Agnostic atheist, pro-choice anti-abortion
May 10, 2006
16,332
899
49
Burnaby
Visit site
✟44,046.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-NDP
245 posts and this discussion on evolution is still going on.

You evolutionists don't get it, do you?

Jesus didn't believe in evolution, and neither should we.

In evolutionist doctrine, Eve came first, followed by Adam thousands of years later.

Yet Jesus clearly spoke of Adam and Eve being married to each other.

No, "evolutionist doctrine" would say that mtEve cam first, followed by mtAdam thousands of years later.

Jesus spoke about Adam and Eve, who are not in any way the same thing at mtAdam and mtEve, so he couldn't have been talking about them.

Just as he wasn't talking about my friend Adam who is married to a woman named Angie, not Eve. In the doctrine of my life, Adam is a couple of years older than me and we were on the ski team together, and Angie is my age and we went to elementary school together. That's clearly not how Jesus described Adam, so I guess my doctrine must be incorrect.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,857,093
52,819
Guam
✟5,226,232.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Well seeing how the name calling isn't going to stop (starting to feel like I'm in kindergarten) which was one thing I asked to stop, I am now stepping out.

I will stop by after a bit to see if we are up in grade levels.

Good day and God Bless everyone
I'll take over, sis.

Watch how I handle these guys --- piece of cake --- :)
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,857,093
52,819
Guam
✟5,226,232.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
How did Judas die? Exploding in the middle of a field or hanging? You decide...
Judas has nothing to do with Magilla Gorilla being even remotely in the line of Adam.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,857,093
52,819
Guam
✟5,226,232.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Actually, it is you theocreologsits who dont get it and moreover, are incapable of getting it.
Thank you --- I couldn't agree more.

Like I have said before, if any of us "theocreologists" do get it, it's for one of three reasons:

  1. It's our mission field.
  2. We were saved out of it.
  3. We're spending too much time in it.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,857,093
52,819
Guam
✟5,226,232.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
No, "evolutionist doctrine" would say that mtEve cam first, followed by mtAdam thousands of years later.

Jesus spoke about Adam and Eve, who are not in any way the same thing at mtAdam and mtEve, so he couldn't have been talking about them.

Just as he wasn't talking about my friend Adam who is married to a woman named Angie, not Eve. In the doctrine of my life, Adam is a couple of years older than me and we were on the ski team together, and Angie is my age and we went to elementary school together. That's clearly not how Jesus described Adam, so I guess my doctrine must be incorrect.
Who came first in atheism --- man or woman?

And why on earth would Jesus be talking about mtEve --- He is talking about the first two human beings ever.
 
Upvote 0

TemperateSeaIsland

Mae hen wlad fy nhadau yn annwyl i mi
Aug 7, 2005
3,195
171
Wales, UK
✟37,185.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Judas has nothing to do with Magilla Gorilla being even remotely in the line of Adam.

I'll assume you cant answer that question then. Guess it's one of those contradictions in your bible you haven't explained away yet.

Watch how I handle these guys --- piece of cake --- :)

The cake is a lie.
 
Upvote 0

atomweaver

Senior Member
Nov 3, 2006
1,706
181
"Flat Raccoon", Connecticut
✟25,391.00
Faith
Agnostic
Politics
US-Democrat
Well seeing how the name calling isn't going to stop (starting to feel like I'm in kindergarten) which was one thing I asked to stop, I am now stepping out.

I will stop by after a bit to see if we are up in grade levels.

It was hyperbole derived from your position, GuidanceNeeded, not mine... Next time you stop by, do try to bring an open mind.
 
Upvote 0

Hespera

Junior Member
Dec 16, 2008
7,237
201
usa
✟8,860.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
Private
Thank you --- I couldn't agree more.

Like I have said before, if any of us "theocreologists" do get it, it's for one of three reasons:

  1. It's our mission field.
  2. We were saved out of it.
  3. We're spending too much time in it.


I dont see no cake in that, just some meaningless words.
 
Upvote 0

Hespera

Junior Member
Dec 16, 2008
7,237
201
usa
✟8,860.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
Private
Who came first in atheism --- man or woman?

And why on earth would Jesus be talking about mtEve --- He is talking about the first two human beings ever.

Q number one is silly and meaningless
Q number two...did you hear him say those things?
 
Upvote 0