- Feb 4, 2006
- 46,773
- 10,976
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Protestant
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Others
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
When I said, "Quantum quarks entangle planck length," can you point out if I used those terms incorrectly, and in what way the useage was incorrect?
Goodness, where to start? Here's a few words creationists misuse to get the ball rolling:I meant scientific terms used by creationists.
You can find an almost complete list here: Oxford English DictionaryGoodness, where to start? Here's a few words creationists misuse to get the ball rolling:
- Evolution
- Theory
- Transitional
Let me ask my question again, and this time please answer with a simple "yes" or "no":
If I can provide an example of you having been shown to be wrong scripturally, scientifically, historically or genetically will you stop claiming that it's never been done?
How many people do you think there are in the world who also claim to be experts in God's truth and who also have very different ideas about it than yours?
Why do you suppose that scripture should agree with science?I support my views with the agreement of Scripture with science, history and genetics. Faith plus fact equals God's Truth.
I support my views with the agreement of Scripture with science, history and genetics. Faith plus fact equals God's Truth.
Huh? Why can't you just answer the question I asked?I have currently withdrawn my idea that Chromosome 2 fusion is caused by introducing Adam's descendants into the Human genome on planet Earth....until it is confirmed by more recent discoveries of Science. Other than that, yes.
You haven't supported your position. All you've done is repeat the claim. If you are using the Bible as the claim, you can't also use the Bible as support for the claim.
Prove to me that human intelligence could only have come from God. Giving me a passage from an old book doesn't count.
How do you know you're an expert in "god's truth?"
Except there's many instances where science disagrees with scripture. History and genetics disagree with scripture too.
Huh? Why can't you just answer the question I asked?
If I can provide an example that you have been shown to be wrong scripturally, historically, scientifically or genetically will you stop claiming that it has never been done?
Just answer "yes" or "no".
Why do you suppose that scripture should agree with science?
Which is evidence that your interpretation is not true since the proper interpretation of Genesis agrees in every way with every discovery of mankind. It's proof of God.
Human intelligence is the highest form of intelligence because it uses reasoning to judge between good and evil.
Animals, whose origin was in WATER, were NOT made with the highest form of intelligence since they were NOT the descendants of Adam, who was made with God's intelligence.
Genesis 3:22 Rejecting God's Truth while accepting that mindless Nature inserted God's superior intelligence into Apes is really silly since NO one can tell us HOW mindless nature did this magic. Amen?
So once again we have religion fitting itself into what science has discovered?
In any case, this is circular logic. You are coming up with an interpretation that fits with science and then deciding that it must be true because it fits with science. You're just saying, "It agrees with science because it's true because it agrees with science."
And yet you ignore the possibility that the stories could just be wrong altogether.
Things do not become right just because you can interpret them in a way that agrees with what science suggests.
Try to come up with an example of the agreement of Scripture with science, history and genetics.
No, it doesn't. You keep ignoring the theory of evolution. And you keep forgetting how my little friend has refuted all of your claims to date. Have you found any evidence yet?Example please. I have many but I have seen nothing from you. You don't realize that God's Truth in Genesis agrees in every way with every discovery of mankind. Try to come up with an example of the agreement of Scripture with science, history and genetics. Waiting..... Faith plus Fact equals God's Truth.
That fusion is one example of you being wrong. So what you're really saying is "no".I already answered "yes" except to the chromosome 2 fusion.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?