"The first thing we must do is define: evolution. To the scientist, to which many in this forum claim to be, the theory of evolution customarily means a process by which the whole universe came about through a progression of interrelated phenomena. In biology or zoology, the theory of evolution supposes that existing animals and plants have their origins in simpler forms that have been progressively modified through successive generations over extended periods of time. Scientific evolution eliminates belief in God or special creation and ascribes the origins of all life to the action of random chemical and physical forces.
The Bible does coincide with this belief and does not teach evolution. The Bible does teach an act of creation by God of a universe out of formless void, and then individual acts of creation in an ascending order from the simpler forms of aquatic life to the mammals and finally to a creature made in God's image - man. Human beings did not evolve out of the primordial ooze. They are the special creation of an all-powerful God.
Therefore, it can be said that the Bible teaches "creation in ascending order." When the scientist discover the ascending order of the plants and animals on Earth, their factual observations are generally in harmony with the Bible. The scientists go wrong, however, when they attempt to draw theological theories of origin from their findings.
The ascending order of living creatures is an observable fact. Apart from the Bible or the revelation of God, the source of their origin is unknown and scientific speculation about their origin can only be theory - never fact.
However, one major imperical fact negates the theory of scientific evolution. There has never been one observable case of any creature shifting (or evolving) from one biological class to another or from one phylum to another. There is no case where we have remains or fossils of an animal that died during the evolutionary process. The reason is clear. The Bible says that God made each animal "after its kind" through a special act of creation for each one of them.
I think the greatest example of this is the mule. The mule is a cross between a donkey and a horse. Mules are born sterile. They are unable to reproduce themselves. In other words, the horse and the donkey were close enough in the biological ladder to interbreed with each other, but their offspring could not continue the breeding process. Even that close link could not reproduce. Certainly nobody has ever bred a bird with a snake or an ape with a man. There is no reproductive evidence to support evolution."
From the book "Answers to 200 of Life's Most Probing Questions" by Pat Robertson
The Bible does coincide with this belief and does not teach evolution. The Bible does teach an act of creation by God of a universe out of formless void, and then individual acts of creation in an ascending order from the simpler forms of aquatic life to the mammals and finally to a creature made in God's image - man. Human beings did not evolve out of the primordial ooze. They are the special creation of an all-powerful God.
Therefore, it can be said that the Bible teaches "creation in ascending order." When the scientist discover the ascending order of the plants and animals on Earth, their factual observations are generally in harmony with the Bible. The scientists go wrong, however, when they attempt to draw theological theories of origin from their findings.
The ascending order of living creatures is an observable fact. Apart from the Bible or the revelation of God, the source of their origin is unknown and scientific speculation about their origin can only be theory - never fact.
However, one major imperical fact negates the theory of scientific evolution. There has never been one observable case of any creature shifting (or evolving) from one biological class to another or from one phylum to another. There is no case where we have remains or fossils of an animal that died during the evolutionary process. The reason is clear. The Bible says that God made each animal "after its kind" through a special act of creation for each one of them.
I think the greatest example of this is the mule. The mule is a cross between a donkey and a horse. Mules are born sterile. They are unable to reproduce themselves. In other words, the horse and the donkey were close enough in the biological ladder to interbreed with each other, but their offspring could not continue the breeding process. Even that close link could not reproduce. Certainly nobody has ever bred a bird with a snake or an ape with a man. There is no reproductive evidence to support evolution."
From the book "Answers to 200 of Life's Most Probing Questions" by Pat Robertson
