- Feb 4, 2006
- 46,773
- 10,977
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Protestant
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Others
I'm not telling anyone else what to believe, if that's what you mean.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
And i would imagine, that is all you personally need.
Point was, one merely needs to look. You refuse to. Out of fear? Probably - fear that you will see that your amazing 'insights' on yet another topic will seen to be embarrassingly ridiculous
Rather than play your one-liner game - you know, the game you play when you realize that you are in way over your head and are desperate to try to save face - why not put the specifics of your "theory" out there for us to see?
Why not just use appropriate terminology? Because you don't know it?In plumber's jargon,
So... It is your learned position that studying anatomy (to include neuroanatomy) does NOT include any instruction or exploration on how the parts work or what they do? Interesting. Interesting in its simple-mindedness.Psycho = fluids
Somatic = pipes.
You seem to be mainly concerned with the pipes.
Routes and destinations? That is the parts, bucky.I'm exploring the psycho, their routes and destinations.
Using carpenters as an example, you are studying the tools, while I am attempting to build something with them.
"Mechanical" neurons? What are you ranting about?Sorry, I was referring to chemical, not mechanical, neurons. That would be the 'smoke signals'.
Why "theorize" about something when the answers are already in hand?The LRN 'sheds' tiny nerve fibers to the aortic arch as it passes beneath it. I theorize that this might be a pathway for communications from the heart to the larynx (many great discoveries begin with a theory).
None, because it doesn't.What is the purpose of the heart sending signals directly to the esophagus?
Umm... This is sort of hilarious to me."The extrinsic cardiac ganglia, located in the thoracic cavity, have direct connections to organs such as the lungs and esophagus and are also indirectly connected via the spinal cord to many other organs, including the skin and arteries."
Does the heart have to communicate with the brain to both manage itself and the function of other organs?
First part, makes sense, second part, loony nonsense.Many articles about the "mind of the heart" state that the heart sends more signals to the brain than it receives from the brain, and that in many cases the brain is subservient to the 'wishes' of the heart.
I'm sure it is.It is also elsewhere suggested that the 'gut' has much the same powers.
LOL!So far my research reveals that this phenomenon is not fully understood. You may want to bring the other researchers up to date on the gut/brain connection, to include, and exclude, nerve and other pathways.
LOL!
Right - well if your reliance on the 'HeartMath Institute' is any indication of your level of gullibility, I'm not worried that you will be overturning anything any time soon.
Let me know when you have proven that 'mechanical neurons' send vocalization signals from the gut or the aorta directly to the larynx via the RLN - I mean, you are not trying to obscure the fact that THAT was your original claim, right?
There's no voodoo in evolution either. Why do you keep saying these things? You've already admitted you don't understand anything about evolution, so how can you comment about it?I'm speaking of evolution, not science in general.
Is there any evidence against evolution? Scientific evidence I mean, not Bible verses.Evolutionists see only evidence that supports their theory.
When there's some evidence for design, science will consider it.Worse yet they have banished any concept of design in nature as anathema to the theory.
Why should a lack of evidence against evolution and a lack of evidence for design, leave anyone scratching their head?That alone should leave one scratching their head.
There's no voodoo in evolution either. Why do you keep saying these things? You've already admitted you don't understand anything about evolution, so how can you comment about it?
Is there any evidence against evolution? Scientific evidence I mean, not Bible verses.
I'll bite. What other functions do you think it has? What is the evidence for your claims?
Impressive credentials, but lacks the discipline needed to address my theory, which would be the study of the nerve (or other) pathways involved in the brain/emotion cycle. In my reading I haven't found such a study.
You have placed yourself, imo, in the same camp as the one who stated that the only function of the heart is to pump blood. Probably because that is the only function that can be observed.
No hard evidence, just the odds against it happening.
That's not enough for anybody but you.I'm going strictly by appearances. It looks like it was designed and functions like it was designed. That's all I've got.
Show us the math.
So give us one and tell us how it supports your conclusions.I didn't use a diagram. I simply said that there are diagrams available to support my contention.
I'll bite. What other functions do you think it has? What is the evidence for your claims?
So give us one and tell us how it supports your conclusions.
Still not evidence. Perhaps we should discuss what is and what is not evidence. Then you would not repeat this error.Just look at you own hand (it's right there, on the end of your arm).
Just look at you own hand (it's right there, on the end of your arm).
What have you actually read about it? Give us some books or scientific articles you've read.The more I read about it the more magical it gets, actually rivaling the magic of God.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?