Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The problem is that you do believe in voodoo. But you are right on one thing, your personal ignorance of science is not apt to harm you. But if you push for the ignorance of science you will harm others.
Thye only voodoo involved is what's in your imagination. There's no voodoo in science.Isn't good for who? Is mankind poorer because I don't believe the ToE? I'm the richer as I enjoy all the benefits of science without the voodoo.
Thye only voodoo involved is what's in your imagination. There's no voodoo in science.
Evolution is one of the most well evidenced theories in science. Therefore, you are speaking of science.
I'll grant that it is the most well theorized theory in science.
American History professor to incoming class:
"Forget everything you learned in high school. You are about to learn the truth."
That probably happens in other subjects besides history, for example mathematics.
It is also extremely well evidenced. Now if you wanted to learn how and why that is the case you could. It's up to you.
Evolutionists see only evidence that supports their theory. Worse yet they have banished any concept of design in nature as anathema to the theory. That alone should leave one scratching their head.
Incorrect.
Perhaps instead of making groundless projections, you should try learning about the ToE and how and why it is supported.
Then you'll also be in a better position to understand why things like 'Intelligent Design' have been rejected as pseudoscience with no evidentiary support.
Evolution rejects design, period, whether intelligent or not.
I feel like we might be getting into equivocation territory here, so perhaps you should define what you mean by evolution and design in this context.
Take an organ, such as the human hand with all it's connections. I see elegant design from the start, not the end product of a million fortuitous changes over millions of years (details which are impossible to verify). Studying anatomy reveals such design from the smallest detail to the whole organism.
I asked for a definition of design and evolution. What are your definitions of such?Simply claiming you "see design" isn't a definition in the human hand isn't a definition of such.
On top of that, we've already established your claims of design in living things is based on emotional arguments and circular logic. So if you're going down that route again, you can surely appreciate why such arguments are not persuasive and certainly not scientific.
Not anathema, irrelevant.Evolutionists see only evidence that supports their theory. Worse yet they have banished any concept of design in nature as anathema to the theory. That alone should leave one scratching their head.
Falsehood alert: Evolution does not reject design. Design is an unfalsifiable proposition which science cannot disprove.Evolution rejects design, period, whether intelligent or not.
Design is a plan from which something is created or fabricated. Just reverse engineer the human hand and you'll see the plan (many such diagrams are available). I'm only trying to persuade you and others that I believe that we were designed, and not the result of happenstance. I would think that by now you and others would concede the fact that OldWiseGuy believes in special creation. Of course it is challenging to you and others as I keep imposing this belief into these evolution threads.
Falsehood alert: Evolution does not reject design. Design is an unfalsifiable proposition which science cannot disprove.
Then perhaps you can condescend to show us some ACTUAL evidence that counters it? Or better yet - evidence FOR your deity magic stories?Evolutionists see only evidence that supports their theory.
Heavens, no!!! I also heard tell that the 'turtles all the way down' story of creation has been banned in science!Worse yet they have banished any concept of design in nature as anathema to the theory.
Why?That alone should leave one scratching their head.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?