- Feb 4, 2006
- 46,773
- 10,977
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Protestant
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Others
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
And yet you repeatedly refuse to admit error, and continually imply that you mere (refuted) opinions are correct.
Funny how that works.
No, they didn't. Science provided the industry. Corporations, politicians and green turned it into a wrecking ball.
Science is a neutral entity.
But are scientists neutral entities where business is concerned?
Problems right from the first two sentences:The recent observation of molecular convergence in many species poses impossible mathematical challenges to evolution. I would be interested to know how this can be refuted... maskofscience.com
"overwhelming" and "astronomical" are phrases used in winning the lottery as well. Yet somehow someone always wins it eventually.No need. Science articles routinely use words like "overwhelming" and "astronomical" in describing the odds against evolution, albeit prefaced by the phrase "in spite of". I just ignore that phrase and take them at their word.
Even if this is true that he said that, one person is not "science articles" and saying something once is not "routine".I myself personally heard Carl Sagan say this some years ago.
If they did, it would most likely be unlike any "wing" we're familiar with. Next you'll be telling us the evolution predicts that a dog will give birth to a cat.simple logical conclusion: if a dog produce more variations of dogs, do you think that its logical to conclude that such a dog may evolve wings?
Science has solved a lot of problems, from the eradication of deadly diseases (until the anti-vaxxers came along and have started screwing it up) to food production.True, and science hasn't solved our problems but instead has made a business of them.
Do you really think any one organism evolves over it's entire existence? If you actually think that, you are sorely uniformed about evolutionary theory.Says the guy who cant show any change in any fossil creature over its entire existence without claiming imaginary missing ancestors, then claims science is on his side with his imagination....
I guess you feel that people have no right to exercise free will and chose to not take vaccines when they are aware of potential dangers.Science has solved a lot of problems, from the eradication of deadly diseases (until the anti-vaxxers cam along and have started screwing it up) to food production.
No, gun manufacturers do provide the wrecking ball. Some people use said wrecking ball properly and some don't.I hope others can apply that to gun manufacturers as well.
The argument is right there: he cannot compare a man made machine, an impossible man made machine since mechanical constructs cannot self replicate, with the process of evolution. It's like comparing apples to plastic oranges.
Scientists are humans, plain and simple and fallible.
Their rights are constrained when they live in a society with other people who may come to harm as a result of their actions. Herd immunity for measles requires about 95% vaccination, which means that everyone who can be vaccinated should be, so the other 5% consists of those who cannot be vaccinated for various (usually medical) reasons.I guess you feel that people have no right to exercise free will and chose to not take vaccines when they are aware of potential dangers.
Right. Being a high IQ guy, surely you understand that guns were invented and are designed to kill people. You know that, right?I hope others can apply that to gun manufacturers as well.
Odd then that all of the anti-environmentalists I am aware of are right-wing Christians.The third rail is belief/creation/design. With it comes the moral imperative to "dress and keep" the environment. Without it science has brought the environment to the brink of destruction (all the while cleverly decrying the very destruction it has wrought).
No, gun manufacturers do provide the wrecking ball. Some people use said wrecking ball properly and some don't.
Right. Being a high IQ guy, surely you understand that guns were invented and are designed to kill people. You know that, right?
Odd then that all of the anti-environmentalists I am aware of are right-wing Christians.
Scientists are humans, plain and simple and fallible.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?