- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,856,216
- 52,662
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I don't stand around scratching my head though.Bottom line: you cannot offer any proof that the Bible's claim that everything was created 'pure' is factual. You have a claim only.
I don't stand around scratching my head though.
Not evidence that you would be able to understand. The main evidence is teeth. They should be for eating plants, not flesh. There is no violence in God's Kingdom. The animals do not eat and devour one another. That is why we talk about paradise and utopia. A world of peace and harmony where there is no fights, arguments or division. Because we will all have the mind of Christ and think the Divine thoughts of God.No scientific evidence then, thanks.
Not evidence that you would be able to understand. The main evidence is teeth. They should be for eating plants, not flesh. There is no violence in God's Kingdom. The animals do not eat and devour one another. That is why we talk about paradise and utopia. A world of peace and harmony where there is no fights, arguments or division. Because we will all have the mind of Christ and think the Divine thoughts of God.
6And the wolf will dwell with the lamb, And the leopard will lie down with the young goat, And the calf and the young lion and the fatling together; And a little boy will lead them. 7Also the cow and the bear will graze, Their young will lie down together, And the lion will eat straw like the ox. 8The nursing child will play by the hole of the cobra, And the weaned child will put his hand on the viper's den.9 They will not hurt or destroy in all My holy mountain, For the earth will be full of the knowledge of the LORD As the waters cover the sea.… Isa
What evidence was it that you were wanting? You lost me somewhere along the way.Scientific evidence can be understood.
Let me know when you have some.
What evidence was it that you were wanting? You lost me somewhere along the way.
Must be a communication failure because I do not know what you want. I you sure you are not asking someone else? I know it gets to be a little confusing when your talking to two different people at the same time.The scientific evidence you claim proves the bible is accurate. Specifically, the scientific evidence to show biblical creation is true and the flood happened.
I have asked you this about 10 times now, still nothing.
... to:Yes, I do know that the SLoT (did I get that right?) does apply to Earth and everything in it, but not in the way that creationists want it to apply. They think that due to Earth existing as long as it has and evolution acting on life on Earth as long as it has, it means that (for some messed up reason) the evolution should make things less 'advanced' (it was the only word I could think of for that), i.e. devolve.
... when a creationist responds, isn't it?And neither do I,
Amazing how some people can go from ...
... to:... when a creationist responds, isn't it?
By the way, notice how you come across as positive & sure about yourself when you say, "They that...", but act like you're unsure of everything else?
Evidently you prefer to lurk in a creationist site to see what creationists think, rather than lurk in a scientific site to see what scientists think?Also, I think you meant to put 'they think...' (which I do, since I have been a lurker here for several years, so I'm quite positive on what I've seen creationist claim) instead of 'they that...'.
Evidently you prefer to lurk in a creationist site to see what creationists think, rather than lurk in a scientific site to see what scientists think?
Sorry for being snarky, but I just take exception to Internet scientists who think they know how creationists think.Even though this sub-forum is open to both believers and non-believers... yeah.
Sorry for being snarky, but I just take exception to Internet scientists who think they know how creationists think.
Then they won't answer simple questions honestly when a creationist responds to their false accusations.
(And I'm not even thinking of you here. You're new, and I'm glad you're here.)
Well for the record, I do find "my side" a tad embarrassing and unwilling to speculate when speculation is called for.But to be fair, your side doesn't have a good track record of responding to simple questions honestly.
Well for the record, I do find "my side" a tad embarrassing and unwilling to speculate when speculation is called for.
But we're all on the same side, and that's good enough for me.
I do wish they (we) would drop the science though and go more by faith.
Yes ... but I'm sure I've had my moments as well.... just to clarify, on the second 'we', you mean other creationists, right?
Are you trying to suggest that Noah was not a real person, there was no flood and there was no Ark filled with animals?The scientific evidence you claim proves the bible is accurate. Specifically, the scientific evidence to show biblical creation is true and the flood happened.
Are you trying to suggest that Noah was not a real person, there was no flood and there was no Ark filled with animals?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?