Evolution is a Lie

[CaliforniaSun]

Who rejoiced when the earth was created?

And what are cherubim and seraphim? Chess pieces?

Nobody.

Chess pieces exist.

 

[AV1611VET]

Nobody.

Chess pieces exist.

Is there something I can help you with, or are you beyond that?

 

[CaliforniaSun]

Is there something I can help you with, or are you beyond that?

Is what you have to offer reasonable? Or are you beyond that?

 

[Nathan Poe]

Angel just means messenger, and throughout the Bible most 'Angels' are just normal mortal men or woman who delivered messages i.e in a battle.

Well then there's our answer:

Angels are men and women.

men and women evolved.

ergo, angels evolved.

 

[Research1]

Who rejoiced when the earth was created?

And what are cherubim and seraphim? Chess pieces?

The word 'Angel' can mean an ordinary human messenger (see Job 1: 14; 1 Samuel 11: 3; Luke 7: 24; 9: 52), human prophets (Haggai 1: 13) and also human priests (Malachi 2: 7).

I would say angels in origin are Human, the supernatural element became added far later and is not Biblical, the exact thing happened to Satan or the 'Devil'.

The Devil translates as diablos, but has nothing to do with the supernatural again. It translates as 'false accuser' or 'slanderer':

John 6: 70 - “Have I not chosen you, the Twelve? Yet one of you is a devil!''

Of course Judas was not though the devil. He was a Human, an ordinary man.

 

[AV1611VET]

The word 'Angel' can mean an ordinary human messenger (see Job 1: 14; 1 Samuel 11: 3; Luke 7: 24; 9: 52), human prophets (Haggai 1: 13) and also human priests (Malachi 2: 7).

I would say angels in origin are Human, the supernatural element became added far later and is not Biblical, the exact thing happened to Satan or the 'Devil'.

The Devil translates as diablos, but has nothing to do with the supernatural again. It translates as 'false accuser' or 'slanderer':

John 6: 70 - “Have I not chosen you, the Twelve? Yet one of you is a devil!''

Of course Judas was not though the devil. He was a Human, an ordinary man.

Thanks for the walk through Wrong's Concordance.

Any idea now who rejoiced when the earth was created?

 

[Research1]

Thanks for the walk through Wrong's Concordance.

Any idea now who rejoiced when the earth was created?

No one.

Job 38: 7 is describing stars, its poetic.

Note also Revelation 1:20 -

''The mystery of the seven stars that you saw in my right hand and of the seven golden lampstands is this: The seven stars are the angels of the seven churches''

 

[AV1611VET]

No one.

Job 38: 7 is describing stars, its poetic.

Note also Revelation 1:20 -

''The mystery of the seven stars that you saw in my right hand and of the seven golden lampstands is this: The seven stars are the angels of the seven churches''

Fair enough -- I'll take this with a grain of sand then:

Angel just means messenger, and throughout the Bible most 'Angels' are just normal mortal men or woman who delivered messages i.e in a battle.

 

[rjc34]

Have a good day, gaara.

So when cornered with a legitimate question you can't answer you just give up and concede the point?

 

[rjc34]

Fair enough -- I'll take this with a grain of sand then:

So you can admit that the bible does contradict itself on occasion. We're getting somewhere!

 

[gaara4158]

So when cornered with a legitimate question you can't answer you just give up and concede the point?

Being wrong doesn't faze him. The more wrong he is, the more powerful his god must be, to have misled the scientists so thoroughly. There's nothing anyone can say to change his mind. It's remarkable to observe, really.

 

[AV1611VET]

Being wrong doesn't faze him. The more wrong he is, the more powerful his god must be, to have misled the scientists so thoroughly. There's nothing anyone can say to change his mind. It's remarkable to observe, really.

Well, I wouldn't want to disappoint your tag line now, would I?

 

[gaara4158]

Well, I wouldn't want to disappoint your tag line now, would I?

I look forward to the day you deviate from your rigid pattern of thinking, but I'm not holding my breath. An old dog can't learn new tricks, even if he'd enjoy them.

 

[AV1611VET]

I look forward to the day you deviate from your rigid pattern of thinking, but I'm not holding my breath. An old dog can't learn new tricks, even if he'd enjoy them.

From here: 108

Good --- because one of my biggest fears here is that I'll accidentally contradict myself, and set myself back two years.

 

[rjc34]

Good --- because one of my biggest fears here is that I'll accidentally contradict myself, and set myself back two years.

I feel like I need to go back through every single one of your posts until I find a couple contradictions.

 

[Nathan Poe]

I feel like I need to go back through every single one of your posts until I find a couple contradictions.

I feel there's absolutely nothing AV could ever say that would make such an effort worthwhile.

 

[gaara4158]

What's it matter that you don't contradict yourself when you're demonstrably wrong in some areas and just plain silly in others?

 

[rjc34]

What's it matter that you don't contradict yourself when you're demonstrably wrong in some areas and just plain silly in others?

Makes it seem like his position is set in stone.

Remember, when he can't answer a question without contradicting himself he goes straight to 'Have a good day'.

Remember #276?

 

[driewerf]

On The Origin Of Species by means of natural selection - Google books

Care to show us where? Are you implying the first page of the preface? Or the first page of the first chapter?

I'm going to say you have no read the entire book. And even if you pointed out something, it would end up being just a quote mine, the lowliest of creationist tactics. I'd hope you won't lower yourself to that AV.

been there, done that.

 

[SkyWriting]

Picking scientists who lived before Darwin's theory was established is misleading. Those scientists never had an opportunity to know the truth. And most of them were religious, so by default Creationism was assumed back then due to no alternatives.

These men did not discover what they did because they were Creationists.

You are suggesting that Darwin had no real basis for his theory in fact, that he invented gradualism, and that no alternative scientific theories existed outside of what was taught in some conservative churches. All ridiculous thoughts and very easy to disprove.

And if you'd like to know what motivated these founders of science, read up on them, one at a time.