• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Evolution is a Lie

Status
Not open for further replies.

Nathan Poe

Well-Known Member
Sep 21, 2002
32,198
1,693
51
United States
✟41,319.00
Faith
Agnostic
Politics
US-Democrat
Angel just means messenger, and throughout the Bible most 'Angels' are just normal mortal men or woman who delivered messages i.e in a battle.


Well then there's our answer:

Angels are men and women.

men and women evolved.

ergo, angels evolved.
 
Upvote 0

Research1

Polygenist Old Earth Creationist
Feb 14, 2011
314
2
England
✟476.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Who rejoiced when the earth was created?

And what are cherubim and seraphim? Chess pieces?

The word 'Angel' can mean an ordinary human messenger (see Job 1: 14; 1 Samuel 11: 3; Luke 7: 24; 9: 52), human prophets (Haggai 1: 13) and also human priests (Malachi 2: 7).

I would say angels in origin are Human, the supernatural element became added far later and is not Biblical, the exact thing happened to Satan or the 'Devil'.

The Devil translates as diablos, but has nothing to do with the supernatural again. It translates as 'false accuser' or 'slanderer':

John 6: 70 - “Have I not chosen you, the Twelve? Yet one of you is a devil!''

Of course Judas was not though the devil. He was a Human, an ordinary man.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,571
52,498
Guam
✟5,126,485.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The word 'Angel' can mean an ordinary human messenger (see Job 1: 14; 1 Samuel 11: 3; Luke 7: 24; 9: 52), human prophets (Haggai 1: 13) and also human priests (Malachi 2: 7).

I would say angels in origin are Human, the supernatural element became added far later and is not Biblical, the exact thing happened to Satan or the 'Devil'.

The Devil translates as diablos, but has nothing to do with the supernatural again. It translates as 'false accuser' or 'slanderer':

John 6: 70 - “Have I not chosen you, the Twelve? Yet one of you is a devil!''

Of course Judas was not though the devil. He was a Human, an ordinary man.
Thanks for the walk through Wrong's Concordance.

Any idea now who rejoiced when the earth was created?
 
Upvote 0

Research1

Polygenist Old Earth Creationist
Feb 14, 2011
314
2
England
✟476.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Thanks for the walk through Wrong's Concordance.

Any idea now who rejoiced when the earth was created?

No one.

Job 38: 7 is describing stars, its poetic.

Note also Revelation 1:20 -

''The mystery of the seven stars that you saw in my right hand and of the seven golden lampstands is this: The seven stars are the angels of the seven churches''
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,571
52,498
Guam
✟5,126,485.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
No one.

Job 38: 7 is describing stars, its poetic.

Note also Revelation 1:20 -

''The mystery of the seven stars that you saw in my right hand and of the seven golden lampstands is this: The seven stars are the angels of the seven churches''
Fair enough -- I'll take this with a grain of sand then:
Angel just means messenger, and throughout the Bible most 'Angels' are just normal mortal men or woman who delivered messages i.e in a battle.
 
Upvote 0

gaara4158

Gen Alpha Dad
Aug 18, 2007
6,441
2,688
United States
✟216,414.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
So when cornered with a legitimate question you can't answer you just give up and concede the point?
Being wrong doesn't faze him. The more wrong he is, the more powerful his god must be, to have misled the scientists so thoroughly. There's nothing anyone can say to change his mind. It's remarkable to observe, really.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,571
52,498
Guam
✟5,126,485.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Being wrong doesn't faze him. The more wrong he is, the more powerful his god must be, to have misled the scientists so thoroughly. There's nothing anyone can say to change his mind. It's remarkable to observe, really.
Well, I wouldn't want to disappoint your tag line now, would I?
 
Upvote 0

gaara4158

Gen Alpha Dad
Aug 18, 2007
6,441
2,688
United States
✟216,414.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Well, I wouldn't want to disappoint your tag line now, would I?
I look forward to the day you deviate from your rigid pattern of thinking, but I'm not holding my breath. An old dog can't learn new tricks, even if he'd enjoy them.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,571
52,498
Guam
✟5,126,485.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I look forward to the day you deviate from your rigid pattern of thinking, but I'm not holding my breath. An old dog can't learn new tricks, even if he'd enjoy them.
From here: 108
Good --- because one of my biggest fears here is that I'll accidentally contradict myself, and set myself back two years.
 
Upvote 0

rjc34

Well-Known Member
Feb 22, 2011
1,382
16
✟1,769.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
CA-Others
Good --- because one of my biggest fears here is that I'll accidentally contradict myself, and set myself back two years.

I feel like I need to go back through every single one of your posts until I find a couple contradictions. ;)
 
Upvote 0

rjc34

Well-Known Member
Feb 22, 2011
1,382
16
✟1,769.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
CA-Others
What's it matter that you don't contradict yourself when you're demonstrably wrong in some areas and just plain silly in others?

Makes it seem like his position is set in stone.

Remember, when he can't answer a question without contradicting himself he goes straight to 'Have a good day'.

Remember #276?
 
Upvote 0

driewerf

a day at the Zoo
Mar 7, 2010
3,434
1,961
✟267,108.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,281
8,501
Milwaukee
✟411,038.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Picking scientists who lived before Darwin's theory was established is misleading. Those scientists never had an opportunity to know the truth. And most of them were religious, so by default Creationism was assumed back then due to no alternatives.

These men did not discover what they did because they were Creationists.

You are suggesting that Darwin had no real basis for his theory in fact, that he invented gradualism, and that no alternative scientific theories existed outside of what was taught in some conservative churches. All ridiculous thoughts and very easy to disprove.

And if you'd like to know what motivated these founders of science, read up on them, one at a time.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.