Evolution is a Lie

[Lion Hearted Man]

Don't forget trial-and-error:
​

Raise you:

 

[Split Rock]

Okay, thank you.

Which of the two above is that arrow pointing to, on that chart @ 00:35?

The one that Wikipedia says is 'possibly related', or the one that Wikipedia says is 'unclear'?

Doesn't Wikipedia also say that about the authors of the bible? Or do you only refer to Wikipedia when you think it supports your case?

 

[AV1611VET]

Raise you:

I'll raise:

 

[AV1611VET]

Doesn't Wikipedia also say that about the authors of the bible?

Probably -- but I don't use Wikipedia when asked who wrote the Bible, unless I'm posting the Tablet Theory.

 

[JakeA]

Probably -- but I don't use Wikipedia when asked who wrote the Bible, unless I'm posting the Tablet Theory.

The council of nicea are the editors in chief, they were the ones who had to decide what to keep and what to throw away, they decided to keep jesus as god and throw away Mary's words, edit everything else and voila, grand rulers were made by their own invented new religion...

 

[AV1611VET]

The council of nicea are the editors in chief, they were the ones who had to decide what to keep and what to throw away, they decided to keep jesus as god and throw away Mary's words, edit everything else and voila, grand rulers were made by their own invented new religion...

17

 

[Lion Hearted Man]

I'll raise:

Would you like for me to actually iron out the details of the Thalidomide story, or do you want to keep exploiting a tragedy for your own twisted purposes? I assume you don't know anything about pharmacology or organic chemistry, because the Thalidomide incident is used in virtually all undergraduate programs that study organic compounds as a case study. If anything, Thalidomide has shown the true nature of the practitioners of science - they change when they make missteps, instead of clinging to some sort of stale dogma and never admitting to mistakes.

And the FDA never approved Thalidomide, fyi, because they believed it needed to be tested more. They were right. Give credit where credit is due.

So I ask you, please, would you stop harping on this point?

 

[Delphiki]

I'll raise:

And I'll trump:

YouTube - Creationism vs Science

FATALITY!!!

 

[Chris81]

Yeah, why believe is evolution when you can believe in spontaneous generation. Everybody knows that maggots come from rotten meat, mice from damp straw, and Adam came from a mud pit. It is all so obvious!

 

[AV1611VET]

And I'll trump:

YouTube - Creationism vs Science

FATALITY!!!

And as I have said before: Creation provided the hardware; scientists provide the software.

 

[Lion Hearted Man]

And as I have said before: Creation provided the hardware; scientists provide the software.

Or maybe the universe is more like Apple instead of Windows, and science provided both the hardware AND the software...

 

[dlamberth]

I can't see how anyone could possibly believe in this Evolution nonsense.

Personally, I can't see how anyone could possible deny what God's own Creation, as signed off with God's own signature is showing us in that it is through evolution that God creates new life forms.

.

 

[TerranceL]

I'll raise:

It's curious that you would raise him that, both of the things you've posted were accidents.. the one he posted was done purposefully and with malice.

The two do not compare.

 

[GoSeminoles!]

I thought the cake was a lie?

 

[AV1611VET]

It's curious that you would raise him that, both of the things you've posted were accidents..

Accidents that never should have happened -- do you agree?

 

[TerranceL]

Accidents that never should have happened -- do you agree?

Can you name one accident that should have happened?

 

[Skaloop]

Can you name one accident that should have happened?

Penicillin.

X-Rays.

Gravity.

As least, apocryphally their discoveries were "accidents". But, it was still triumphs of science that actually made those discoveries worthwhile.

 

[AV1611VET]

Can you name one accident that should have happened?

No, I ...

Penicillin.

X-Rays.

Gravity.

As least, apocryphally their discoveries were "accidents". But, it was still triumphs of science that actually made those discoveries worthwhile.

... nevermind --

 

[Nathan Poe]

I can't see how anyone could possibly believe in this Evolution nonsense. They say we came from monkeys, but I don't look like a monkey and don't act like one.

Can you post a Youtube Video so we can put that to a vote?

Also, why are there still monkeys if we replaced them? Answer that!

Both Americans and Australians came from the British (a fact that, by the way, pleases absolutely nobody involved) -- so why are there still British?

Further, how can one animal turn into another? I've never seen a horse give birth to a dog, and neither have you.

Caterpiller ---> Butterfly.

Creationism Fail.

 

[Nathan Poe]

And as I have said before: Creation provided the hardware; scientists provide the software.

And creationists provide the comic relief.