Then you've got nothing to disagree with?
As you are fond of saying, "nothing" is your forte when discussing creation.
But I suppose you do deserve to know the basis of my disagreement with you:
All of your "theories" are based on two premises:
1: That the Bible (only the King James, of course) is the literal and infallible word of God, written by him through infallibly inspired human agents, and infallibly preserved word for word through the millennia.
2: That your interpretation of it -- inspired or not -- is correct.
Now, I assume that my basis for disagreeing with 2 needs no explanation, so let's focus on 1.
If I were were to accept the existence of the Christian God on any level, He would have to have two qualities:
A: An unconditional love for His children -- namely, us.
B: A respect for the gift of Free Will that He allegedly gave us -- God, as I have been told, doesn't want mindless drones; He wants us to choose him, no strings attached.
Unfortunately, your first premise runs counter to both of these qualities. And a god who doesn't have these qualities probably isn't the Christian God, and
definitely isn't a God I would choose to worship of my own free will, "no strings attached."