Evolution Exposed

[crjmurray]

White man speak with forked tongue. First you say it is not obvious then you say it is obvious. The people we are talking about are the very first food producers. Science has puts lots and lots of study into this. All of the information and research even in the last 10 years will verify the bible is accurate and true. I give you tons and tons of rock solid scientific evidence showing you the Bible is true. What do you give me to substantiate your claims the Bible is not true? You got zip zero nothing.

That's hilarious.

 

[HitchSlap]

Do you understand that i do not "believe" the theories of evolution ... that has nothing to do with my ability to comprehend your theories .

Of course it does have everything with you not understanding what ToE actually. Don't be absurd.

 

[HitchSlap]

For well over 100 years people have been coming up with rock solid scientific evidence to support the Bible. We continue to allow science to verify that the bible is accurate and true.

Nada. The Exodus story is complete fiction. Not one shred of evidence to support it. A "King David" never existed, as his mighty kingdom went casually unnoticed by every country during that time. Shall I go on?

BTW, did you answer if Jesus was born before (Matthew) or after (Luke) Herod the Great died?

 

[joshua 1 9]

BTW, did you answer if Jesus was born before (Matthew) or after (Luke) Herod the Great died?

bishop usher uses the year 4004 for adam. If 1000 years is a day then Jesus would be born in around 4 bc.

 

[HitchSlap]

bishop usher uses the year 4004 for adam. If 1000 years is a day then Jesus would be born in around 4 bc.

So Matthew's account is wrong, according to Bishop Usher.

 

[joshua 1 9]

BTW, did you answer if Jesus was born before (Matthew) or after (Luke) Herod the Great died?

Jesus was born before Herod died. He returned from Egypt after herod died.

 

[HitchSlap]

Jesus was born before Herod died. He returned from Egypt after herod died.

You seem to be missing the point.

Luke has Jesus being born AFTER the death of Herod the Great.
Matthew has Jesus being born BEFORE the death of Herod the Great.

This is a contradiction that cannot be equivocated away.

 

[joshua 1 9]

You seem to be missing the point.

Luke has Jesus being born AFTER the death of Herod the Great.

What verse are you referring to?

 

[HitchSlap]

What verse are you referring to?

Lk. 2:1-3 Jesus born during a census, that, according to Josephus, occurred after Herod the Great died.

Mt. 2:1-3 Jesus born during time of Herod the Great.

 

[Goonie]

You seem to be missing the point.

Luke has Jesus being born AFTER the death of Herod the Great.
Matthew has Jesus being born BEFORE the death of Herod the Great.

This is a contradiction that cannot be equivocated away.

What verse are you referring to?

He Is referring to the dating of jesus's birth in reference to quirinius who was governer of syria in 6 - 9 ce after the death of herod. In order to resolve this christians say he was governer before this, but there is zero historical evidence to support this.

 

[joshua 1 9]

So Matthew's account is wrong, according to Bishop Usher.

Have you been sluming it at skeptic dot com? Is that where real men of science go for truth?

 

[HitchSlap]

Have you been sluming it at skeptic dot com? Is that where real men of science go for truth?

Nope. I actually read books. What's your excuse for not knowing the discrepancies of your own bible?

BTW, you still haven't answered my question.

 

[joshua 1 9]

quirinius who was governer of syria in 6 - 9 ce after the death of herod.

here is a web site that clears that up. http://www.biblehistory.net/newsletter/quirinius.htm

 

[HitchSlap]

who is the authority for that little tied bit of information, skeptic dot com? I would hardly consider them to be a reliable source.

Still haven't answered the question.

 

[AV1611VET]

Lk. 2:1-3 Jesus born during a census, that, according to Josephus, occurred after Herod the Great died.

Mt. 2:1-3 Jesus born during time of Herod the Great.

From Adam Clarke's Commentary:

It is probable that the reason why this enrolment, or census, is said to have been throughout the whole Jewish nation, was to distinguish it from that partial one, made ten years after, mentioned Ac 5:37, which does not appear to have extended beyond the estates of Archelaus, and which gave birth to the insurrection excited by Judas of Galilee. See Josephus, Ant. book xx. c. 3.

Acts 5:37 After this man rose up Judas of Galilee in the days of the taxing, and drew away much people after him: he also perished; and all, even as many as obeyed him, were dispersed.

 

[HitchSlap]

From Adam Clarke's Commentary:[verse=Acts 5:37,kjv]Acts 5:37[/verse]

I prefer modern scholarship. Much has been discovered the last two hundred years.

 

[HitchSlap]

I prefer modern scholarship. Much has been discovered the last two hundred years.

BTW, Acts is considered to be complete fiction by scholars.

 

[Goonie]

For well over 100 years people have been coming up with rock solid scientific evidence to support the Bible. We continue to allow science to verify that the bible is accurate and true.

No for 100 years religious people have been cherry picking scientific evidence to suit their beliefs, whilst ignoring all evidence that contradicts.

 

[AV1611VET]

I prefer modern scholarship. Much has been discovered the last two hundred years.

BTW, Acts is considered to be complete fiction by scholars.

Is that why you prefer modern scholarship?

 

[HitchSlap]

Is that why you prefer modern scholarship?

No, It's why I prefer to believe things that are true.