Ark-Guy said:I would ask yoou for your references...but I know you won't be able to produce them.
http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/historyoflife/histoflife.html
http://tolweb.org/tree/phylogeny.html
Have fun reading.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Ark-Guy said:I would ask yoou for your references...but I know you won't be able to produce them.
gluadys said:
gluadys said:Not so. The fossil record does not show ALL species appearing within a week either recently or anciently. Instead different species appear at different times and those times can be millions, hundreds of millions, even billions of years apart.
Yes, on occasion, many new species appear for the first time in the same time-frame. But these are still very different from species which appeared earlier and species which appeared later.
A lot of new species appear in the Cambrian, but a lot of species appeared long before the Cambrian, and the Cambrian species are all very different from the species of the Quaternary.
Nothing you posted suggests that this is untrue. The appearance of new forms is a process that spans many ages. In any one age, the species that appear in that age may appear "suddenly". But that is an entirely different thing than saying all species appeared within a week.
2 Tim 3:16-17Captain_Jack_Sparrow said:I should be noted that Curt often posts delusions.
As a working scientist in US academia I can tell you right now that not only are scientists not leaving the 'camp' by numbers most of them are not even familiar with the debate. They think this issue was settled a century or more ago and don't even deign to take part thinking it is beneath them.
Apart from the occasionally reporting of an educational reform in Bible Belt states this debate is not even a blip on the science radar.
Curt said:If one believes The Bible is infallible They couldn't be a Theistic evolutionist, because they are adding something to The Bible, and in so doing are taking away from God's Word on How He created everything. God esteems His word higher than Himself.
What makes you think that those mutations can't accumulate? Can you provide the mechanism preventing an accumulation of small changes?Ark-Guy said:If I misquoted you then I apologize..but you should also realize that all though muttations do occur it is impossible for them to add up over time to produce the change the evos claim occured.
Just think about how many mutations were required to develope the echo-location system in the dolphin.
Ark-Guy said:I looked and did not find a reference pertaining to the topic of our discussion. My guess, you just presented these links with out reading them yourself.
Just what part of the links did you intend as the references?
They are not in the Jewish Bible. Also, compare the Catholic and Protestant Bibles. They have different books.Curt said:Curt, if we aren't supposed to add to God's word, how do you fit the Gospels into your plan?
[I don't have to fit The Gospels into anything God has fit them into The Bible exactly where He wants them.]
Denying God again. Not good, Curt. Think about it. What is science? It is the study of the physical universe. Who created the physical universe? God, right? What science studies is God's second book. Christians have long said this. Where have you been? Off worshipping your false idol of the Bible?Quote:
The Bible isn't a science book. There are many things we know that were not revelaed to the Bible because that is not the Bible's purpose.
[It doesn't have to be, God doesn't need science.]
Most places it simply says "God created" without giving a how. In fact, only in Genesis 1-3 are we given a how -- well, actually two hows. There are some NT passages referring to Genesis 1-3 but they aren't telling us how God created. They are only using the stories as stories to make another point.And by "God's Word on How He created everything: are you referring to Genesis.
[Not only to Genesis but every where in The Bible where He tells about creation. It's found all through The Bible spoken by men who talked with God, The Prophets, psalmists, and others.