Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I said that in my post.They are all "homo".
But seriously, here, I will give you something more to mock me for, something to consider for you and I both have faith, we both believe that when God says "let there be life" it happens. However, behind the scenes there is actual work going on. There are a myriad of created beings who carry out such directives in accordance with the will of God. When Jesus desired the water to be turned to wine, It wasn't magic, he had at his disposal numerous celestial beings who knew how to make it happen.
I said that in my post.
I'm asking if they are all men?
YES or NO?
If you want to call them that, pony up.
Here is the Biblical definition of "kind":
Genesis 1:11 And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so.
I would say the closest [plutoed] word academia has for "kind" is "genus."
If that's not good enough, then make up another word for it.
If academia can pluto "child" to "fetus" ... then act like it understands, it can certainly pluto "kind" to [whatever] and act like it understands.
Scientists use the fancier word "observations".So it's all about superficial "appearances"?
Did these gremlins also go to work to "let the dry land appear"?However, behind the scenes there is actual work going on. There are a myriad of created beings who carry out such directives in accordance with the will of God.
No kidding -- it was a miracle.Colter said:When Jesus desired the water to be turned to wine, It wasn't magic,
Either that, or the elements in and around the water rearranged themselves to Jesus' specifications.Colter said:... he had at his disposal numerous celestial beings who knew how to make it happen.
They are all "homo". They are not all "homo sapiens". Men = homo sapiens. If you were to meet them in real life, you wouldn't call them "humans". The oldest ones, you'd consider them more like a new kind of ape like chimps and gorilla's yet more "human-like". Just like a chimp is more "human-like" compared to a macaque for example.
I said MEN.So the answer is no. Only the Homo Sapiens is a human
My fellow creationists don't worry about what a kind is, like my fellow Bible-hating whitecoats do.Tell it to your fellow creationists who can't seem to agree on what a "kind" is.
Actually it does -- but not to us.DogmaHunter said:Not that it matters, off course.
Indeed It does.DogmaHunter said:The bible says a lot of things.
But that won't stop inquiring minds from begging for a definition that's useable under an electron microscope, will it?DogmaHunter said:None of which are relevant to scientific inquiry.
Like they can see what we see, eh?Scientists use the fancier word "observations".
I call them "men."You might call them "white russians" just to poke fun.
Did these gremlins also go to work to "let the dry land appear"?No kidding -- it was a miracle.Either that, or the elements in and around the water rearranged themselves to Jesus' specifications.
Dry land appear? Sort of, they knew the land masses would break up and move around, so they planted the created primitive life forms in three separate places.Did these gremlins also go to work to "let the dry land appear"?No kidding -- it was a miracle.Either that, or the elements in and around the water rearranged themselves to Jesus' specifications.
I said MEN.
Why are you plutoing my words to make your philosophy look right?
You believe a lot of false things, so this doesn't mean much.Here ... I'll answer my own question ... since I'm not ashamed of what I believe:
All the above are men.
If they were alive today, they'd be citizens with a birth certificate and social security number.
So were Homo ergaster, Homo heidelbergenesis, Homo sapiens, Homo habilis, Homo erectus, and Homo neanderthalensis all men?They were right to assume it came from God but wrong to assume Adam and Eve were the first humans.
Well...…..they were probably Catholic priest fer-sure! But I would use the term "Hominina".So were Homo ergaster, Homo heidelbergenesis, Homo sapiens, Homo habilis, Homo erectus, and Homo neanderthalensis all men?
Just repeating a lie till the cows come home is a useless endeavor.We are in an Era that after extensive scientific enquiry of unearthed fossils that science shows evolution never happened.
We ourselves have experienced part of this Era, and was not told the scientific facts about what the fossil record shows.
What we have been told, and still dominately promoted in public schools, is Evolution has been the process for how all fosdils and current life around us has been produced.
This is the heart topic of this thread. How evolution is promoted as the life given process for origin of life we see, past and present.
However, the fossil record does not support evolution ever happened.
Are there any Catholic priests who are Urantians that you know of?Well...…..they were probably Catholic priest fer-sure!
And is this information with respect to our science, or in spite of it?Colter said:In the UB the revelators consider true humans to be those who are will conscious and able to be indwelt by the spirit of God. They came about 1,000,000 years ago. The tribe that true human beings came from had other offshoots and retrogressions
Evolutionists have stated for two centuries that life on Earth came about through evolution.
It was Charles Darwin "Origin of the Species" text in 1859 that formulated the mechanisms of how evolution worked in producing all of the lifeforms of the past and present.
But since Darwin's days Earth Scientists have only unearthed lifeforms without a sequence of fossils between them. In other words, between any two different lifeforms there has been a complete gap of missing fossils that showed one lifeform -through sequential morphological details - demonstratedly changed into another lifeform.
This is very very odd. Zero fossils showing that evolution is by scientific evidence a life giving process.
At this point in time, year 2018, evolution lacks the very proof it says it produces.
In the fossil record and in modern times all we see are species of animals.
By way of scientific investigation and evidence we are now at the point in time evolution is not based on science but on conjecture.
Evolution can no longer be presented/promoted to the masses as the only way life past and present has come about on Earth.
The God of the Bible can no longer be stiff-armed and pushed aside in how life on Earth came about. Godless naturalistic man can no longer state science and Naturalism can account for the Cosmos, Earth and life on Earth as the sole source for their existence.
Evolution is now based on conjecture, in year 2018.
What's next? The Creator of the Bible unfolding His Purpose in the Latter Times? Evolutionists diehards resistant to give up their more than a century old position of how life came about on Earth, even by many words of conjecture?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?