Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
like what? I’d honestly say that was conjecture but my field isn’t physics or astronomy so I’m letting you come up with informationThe Cosmos is here so something larger
and more complex than the entire Cosmos caused it.
Sure - domestic roses Have 7, 14, 28 or 35 chromosomes depending on the species. As you see these chromosome counts are all multiples of seven . There is also both macaroni wheat and bread wheat . And don’t forget raphanobrassica ( of course they’ve changed the name since I was a kid but it’s easy to find) raphanobrassica is the offspring of a radish and a cabbage. The plant is healthy and fertile with other rsphanobrassicas but not with either parent species . This is all macroevolution that’s easy to observe. Usually happens in plants but has happened in animals
My poor wording during drafting - it should have been directed as proper to the existing lifeforms on earth; origin of lifeforms that have existed past and present.Evolution DOES NOT address the origin of life. Since it is hard to believe that you, of all people don’t know this, how is it that you are not engaging in deliberate misrepresentation?
Kind doesn’t have a scientific meaning. Do you mean species like in Homo sapiens ?Or genera if you talk about the canids. ? Or entire Clades of many genera if you’re speaking of beetles or even larger clades with insects families.
Species can have several different meanings depending on whether you’re talking about parthenogenic animals , asexual organisms, organisms that have sex and how they have sex . There are also cryptospecies which look alike to us but that won’t or can’t mate. There are ring species like the Atlantic gulls and the California salamanders .
"Kind" means the offspring look like the parents. That's all it means.I don't see how this is macro evolution when they're all the same kind.
"Kind" means the offspring look like the parents. That's all it means.
They look like the same KIND.
Every living organism is made up of cells.You can't show me a single piece of evidence that we all have a common ancestor?
Evolutionists have stated for two centuries that life on Earth came about through evolution.
But since Darwin's days Earth Scientists have only unearthed lifeforms without a sequence of fossils between them.
In other words, between any two different lifeforms there has been a complete gap of missing fossils that showed one lifeform -through sequential morphological details - demonstratedly changed into another lifeform.
This is very very odd. Zero fossils showing that evolution is by scientific evidence a life giving process.
At this point in time, year 2018, evolution lacks the very proof it says it produces.
In the fossil record and in modern times all we see are species of animals.
By way of scientific investigation and evidence we are now at the point in time evolution is not based on science but on conjecture.
Evolution can no longer be presented/promoted to the masses as the only way life past and present has come about on Earth.
The God of the Bible can no longer be stiff-armed and pushed aside in how life on Earth came about.
What's next? The Creator of the Bible unfolding His Purpose in the Latter Times?
Evolutionists diehards resistant to give up their more than a century old position of how life came about on Earth, even by many words of conjecture?
Could it be that this is a lie of the devil to discredit the word of God?
So you are telling me we can observe plants macro evolve over time?
What evidence shows that every species was able to speciate that way?
I don't see how this is macro evolution when they're all the same kind.
I'm not a scientist but God knows the sciences better than any mortal man, you may find cool little intricacies in the genetic makeup of species and their reproductive systems and etc. I mean you could spend a lifetime researching ants and still not get enough.
My point is that none of these small intricacies in very few species of life consistently validate reason to say "this is evidence for evolution" or "this is how everything evolves", I can tell you despite your endeavors it will never happen.
Sure there's evidence for evolution, but it's stealing evidence that actually points to the truth. Maybe it's not that maniacal but in essence that's the jist of what's going on.
"Kind" means the offspring look like the parents. That's all it means.
They look like the same KIND.
They're all men, aren't they?* Homo ergaster
* Homo heidelbergenesis
* Homo sapiens
* Homo habilis
* Homo erectus
* Homo neanderthalensis
They're all men, aren't they?
Here is the Biblical definition of "kind":By that logic, humans and chimps are the same "kind".
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?