• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Evolution and the myth of "scientific consensus"

Status
Not open for further replies.

Oncedeceived

Senior Veteran
Jul 11, 2003
21,214
629
✟66,870.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Adding ID buzzwords does not change anything. It is nothing more than the appearance of design, just like the appearance of faces in trees.
I am waiting for you to provide evidence that shows it is an illusion. It is not just like a pattern we see in clouds or toast. The appearance is not only in the appearance of the feature or system like the BF but in the function and purpose that both the BF and the humanly designed helicopter rotor.
 
Upvote 0

justlookinla

Regular Member
Mar 31, 2014
11,767
199
✟35,675.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I was showing how the designer is identified by the marks the designer leaves. You can determine how something is built by looking at the thing that is built. So where have you done this with life?

And again you will not answer the simple question.

The identification of the designer isn't necessary in determining if something is designed, is it?
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,187
52,654
Guam
✟5,151,331.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0

Oncedeceived

Senior Veteran
Jul 11, 2003
21,214
629
✟66,870.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
BTW Once, I asked in an earlier post how you do you determine that Mt. Rushmore is designed?
I am not gullible enough to believe that natural processes could create the complex design we see. You don't think that MT. Rushmore was created by natural processes do you Hitch?
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,143
Visit site
✟98,025.00
Faith
Agnostic
Are you now going to claim that functions of systems in the living form has no purpose? Really? You really are stretching here aren't you?

JLA is the one who claimed they had purpose. I am asking for evidence.

Once again, you shift the burden of proof.
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,143
Visit site
✟98,025.00
Faith
Agnostic
I am not gullible enough to believe that natural processes could create the complex design we see. You don't think that MT. Rushmore was created by natural processes do you Hitch?

That would be an argument based on incredulity, a logical fallacy.
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,143
Visit site
✟98,025.00
Faith
Agnostic
And again you will not answer the simple question.

The identification of the designer isn't necessary in determining if something is designed, is it?

I would say that it is necessary. When you identify design, you are identifying a designer. It is the act of designing that leaves the evidence, such as the use of tools or methodologies.
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,143
Visit site
✟98,025.00
Faith
Agnostic
I've asked a few times now and each time a response other than a simple answer to the simple question. This means that it's most likely not going to be answered.

"I would say that it is necessary. When you identify design, you are identifying a designer. It is the act of designing that leaves the evidence, such as the use of tools or methodologies."
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.