Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Not really, no. Not any more than I recognize similarity between these two:Do you recognize the similarity between the two?
Do you recognize the similarity between the two?
What evidence other than the general mix large amounts of time add step by step speculations = any known system or feature?There are many natural features that have similarity to human designs. Hasn't anyone pointed that out to you? Didn't you read "Climbing Mt. Improbable", or is that one quote the extent of your reading?
What evidence other than the general mix large amounts of time add step by step speculations = any known system or feature?
Not really, no. Not any more than I recognize similarity between these two:
Edit: better example: any more than I see analogy between a grappling hook and HIV's retractable spear proteins.
Loudmouth, you haven't provided evidence for your position. If you claim that this appearance of design is an illusion it is up to YOU to provide evidence of that claim.Where is the evidence for ID? Do you have something more than pareidolia?
Loudmouth, you haven't provided evidence for your position. If you claim that this appearance of design is an illusion it is up to YOU to provide evidence of that claim.
How much evidence would it take for you to accept Leprechauns do not exist.Loudmouth, you haven't provided evidence for your position. If you claim that this appearance of design is an illusion it is up to YOU to provide evidence of that claim.
I have to wonder and I am sure there are others as well how there is always the claim that there is mountains of evidence for evolution and how it explains how life is how it is, but when it is time to present said evidence for those claims nothing is presented. If you are so confident of your position why do you say that there is no evidence and we shouldn't expect any considering the problems of no fossil evidence, no genetic evidence, and millions of years between then and now? How if there is no fossil evidence, no genetic evidence, and millions of years between now and then do you explain you being an Empiricalist who only believes what can be shown with empirical evidence?It is up to you to provide real objective evidence for design, not subjective appearances.
So you deny that there is an appearance of design in living things?How much evidence would it take for you to accept Leprechauns do not exist.
You can't take a positive position, then expect someone else to provide negative evidence. You're the one making the assertion that appearance is obvious, it's up to you, then, to provide evidence.
Because to verify that it was indeed designed by an entity you need to show a connection. You are not showing a connection to a designer.It is the fact that living things have elements that do have this design inference and design like features that humans recognize as design.
Why would the entity need to be identified? There is no reason that in the far far future that if all records were unavailable to those observing that they would need to know who the artist was for Mount Rushmore to know it was designed.
If you are looking for a specific individual no. However, you need to show a connection.Sooooo.....the identification of the designer is not required to determine the item in the photo was designed.
I can only speak for myself, but I'm familiar with the mountains of evidence, which is why I accept ToE.I have to wonder and I am sure there are others as well how there is always the claim that there is mountains of evidence for evolution and how it explains how life is how it is, but when it is time to present said evidence for those claims nothing is presented. If you are so confident of your position why do you say that there is no evidence and we shouldn't expect any considering the problems of no fossil evidence, no genetic evidence, and millions of years between then and now? How if there is no fossil evidence, no genetic evidence, and millions of years between now and then do you explain you being an Empiricalist who only believes what can be shown with empirical evidence?
How much evidence would it take for you to accept Leprechauns do not exist.
You can't take a positive position, then expect someone else to provide negative evidence. You're the one making the assertion that appearance is obvious, it's up to you, then, to provide evidence.
I have to wonder and I am sure there are others as well how there is always the claim that there is mountains of evidence for evolution and how it explains how life is how it is, but when it is time to present said evidence for those claims nothing is presented.
So you deny that there is an appearance of design in living things?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?