Jan Volkes
Well-Known Member
And the American government leave tens of thousands of Americans to die just because they can not afford health insurance, what has that got to do with ID?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
And the American government leave tens of thousands of Americans to die just because they can not afford health insurance, what has that got to do with ID?And who relieved college students of their money when their tuition was tripled by Parliament?
Sorry, I meant if far into the future it was found.
But you have not substantiated that claim I'm any way. You have provided no evidence that certain data "will be discarded whether or not contamination is identified". This is especially problematic for you because someone who has actually done work in the field has told you otherwise.
Okay, lets make it simple.
This image right her sums up what Old-Earth dating research actually is. Its primary purpose is to create models where the "dates" are calibrated with the Evolutionary creation story. If dates do not fit, then they cannot be "merged" into a cohesive model. The mission of geochronologists is to find support for the preformed conclusion of Evolutionary deep-time. That is the bottom line.
You can talk all day about the specific details of 'dating' methodology but at its core, the field is governed by the evolutionary faith and in the end all hypotheses and models must bow down to Evolution, regardless of the data.
Ah, Consol. I should have known, it has taken me longer this time.Your arguments are pathetic and you know it, ID is just another way to relieve the gullible of their money.
That is the deal here. No one and I do mean no one has provided any evidence of evolution for the molecular machines found in even the most simple life forms such as bacteria. No one has provided evidence that evolution produced them....And here we get to the root of the problem, don't we? It doesn't. The only firm evidence we could find is direct indications of the designer's work. Watching the house being built, going to city hall to pick up the blueprints. Beyond that, you can go a step down in terms and see if analogous structures were "designed", and if this structure has any known way of forming naturally. For example, a very old building - no known naturalistic mechanism is known for the construction of buildings, and every building we've seen so far has been constructed by humans.
Beyond that, though? The logic doesn't hold up at all. We have no evidence of anything that could have designed this, so you're already putting the cart before the horse; there is a fairly decent understanding of naturalistic mechanisms that can produce such structures; the "appearance" of design is largely subjective and not universal. You're trying to establish design backwards, and it doesn't really work.
Recognize anyone?????And who relieved college students of their money when their tuition was tripled by Parliament?
I thought of that, but his punctuation is a lot better than consol's.Ah, Consol. I should have known, it has taken me longer this time.
The students didn't.Recognize anyone?????
I agree.It's not consol. His posts have a distinctly different finger print then consol.
I doubt there are any of those left from the weathering that they have undergone and most certainly could be the case far far into the future just like how we view the pyramids.Signs of carving. Carving leaves recognizable traces.
Actually, the dates are part of the belief system. They need to accredit great time with creating life! They couldn't very well claim we came from apes or monkeys in the recent past!Dating methods have absolutely nothing to do with "EVOLUTION". NOTHING !
The students didn't.
In their zeal to complain, they tried to overturn Prince William's (?) car.
And he had nothing to do with it.
The look on his face was priceless.
I like to challenge those who think we all need to get further educated if they think we should all go down to our local college and sign up for courses.
They'll get a reality check in how the Law of Supply & Demand works.
Let's see their science bail them out of this one.
Not sure what you mean?Really now?
Then why do you state that the natural was created by the supernatural?
When and how did scientific inquiry demonstrate that?
Design is recognizable. We know how we design and design can be detected by those similarities.How can we see this and how can we determine supernatural causes vs natural causes?
Be specific. Preferably with an example.
You are again being dishonest about what biologists actually say about it.
They don't invoke design. Not even by a long shot.
Rather, they state (well, some of them do) that there is an appearance of design and that it is the result of the natural process of evolution.
If you don't understand the difference between "actual X" and mere "appearance of X", then this point will obviously fly straight over your head.
I can only inform you that your misrepresenting the actual position of these biologists.
And it doesn't seem to bother you at all, since you continue to repeat it time and again after SO MANY people have already informed you that you misrepresent these statements.
I don't wish to engage in personal attacks, but after so many times, it becomes really hard not to think you are being dishonest on purpose...
What do you think to accomplish by misrepresenting both evolution as the experts working in that field? Do you really think you can score points here by doing that?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?